Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:21:13 AM(UTC)
Jason Wilde said:
GREEN BAY — If the Green Bay Packers want to bring in a veteran safety this offseason, former University of Wisconsin standout Jim Leonhard has the perfect guy for them.

Him.

The Ladysmith, Wis. native, who turns 32 in October, has played 126 career games for five NFL teams — Buffalo (2005 through 2007), Baltimore (2008), the New York Jets (2009 through 2011), Denver (2012) and Buffalo again last season. But he's played in just seven postseason games during those eight seasons, reaching the AFC Championship Game in 2008 with the Ravens (a loss to the eventual Super Bowl-champion Pittsburgh Steelers) and 2009 with the Jets (a loss to the Indianapolis Colts) before losing in the AFC Divisional Playoffs on with the Broncos in 2012. The Bills finished 6-10 last season.

"I'm chasing a ring. I've been extremely close a number of times," Leonhard said in an interview with Zach Heilprin and Greg Scalzo on ESPN Madison Monday. "That's all I'm playing for. I want to get a Super Bowl. I want to at least have that experience."

For his career, Leonhard has 385 tackles, 12 interceptions and two forced fumbles. According to Pro Football Focus, Leonhard played 634 snaps for the Bills last season and was targeted 27 times in pass coverage, allowing 16 completions, including four touchdowns.

The 5-foot-8, 190-pound Leonhard might not fit the Packers' size requirements for the safety position, but the position is an obvious need for them. M.D. Jennings started all 17 games (including playoffs), but the Packers played Jennings, 2012 fourth-round pick Jerron McMillian, who was released late in the season, Chris Banjo and Sean Richardson alongside Morgan Burnett during the course of the season.

The Packers' safeties failed to intercept a pass all season, while Leonhard had a career-high four interceptions last season.

"I don't want to play that much longer. I'm going to be a little picky here this offseason and see what happens. I'm excited to see where it goes," Leonhard said. "I'd obviously love to come back to Green Bay and play for the hometown fans. That would make a lot of people happy, a lot of my family happy. They wouldn't be quite as conflicted, having to cheer for some teams that they maybe rather wouldn't.

"But you never know. Obviously there's got to be mutual interest on both ends. I'm excited for the process but also nervous to see how it plays out."
play2win  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:28:53 AM(UTC)
A couple of years ago I would have thought yes, it would be a good idea. Not so much now. We need speed, size and ability to range and break up passes or pick them off. At 32, I don't know if he has the wheels, and he certainly doesn't have the size.
Mucky Tundra  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:38:56 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
A couple of years ago I would have thought yes, it would be a good idea. Not so much now. We need speed, size and ability to range and break up passes or pick them off. At 32, I don't know if he has the wheels, and he certainly doesn't have the size.


So I take it you're not on the Jimmie Ward bandwagon? :-k
play2win  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:03:14 AM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
So I take it you're not on the Jimmie Ward bandwagon? :-k


Yeah, I don't know. I think size at S might make a difference, but, there are plenty 6-0 guys out there who do just fine in coverage and securing the run.

Jimmie Ward from Northern Illinois is 5-11, 192. Adept in coverage with 14 PDs, 6 INTs, also good tackler with 77 and 50 solo, 1 sack.

I question how well he would project at the NFL level.

I'd be far more excited about Craig Loston from LSU at 6-2 205, Ahmad Dixon out of Baylor at 6-0 205 - not looking strictly at measureables, but the ability of these two seems far better for taking that next step to the NFL at SS. Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix, Calvin Pryor and Ed Reynolds all have decent size (6-1 to 6-2) and like ability or better at FS. These are pretty much the only Safeties I am excited about Ted possibly drafting, with the little info we can get as fans. If I were to pick one, it might be Dixon out of Baylor.
Mucky Tundra  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:00:13 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, I don't know. I think size at S might make a difference, but, there are plenty 6-0 guys out there who do just fine in coverage and securing the run.

Jimmie Ward from Northern Illinois is 5-11, 192. Adept in coverage with 14 PDs, 6 INTs, also good tackler with 77 and 50 solo, 1 sack.

I question how well he would project at the NFL level.

I'd be far more excited about Craig Loston from LSU at 6-2 205, Ahmad Dixon out of Baylor at 6-0 205 - not looking strictly at measureables, but the ability of these two seems far better for taking that next step to the NFL at SS. Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix, Calvin Pryor and Ed Reynolds all have decent size (6-1 to 6-2) and like ability or better at FS. These are pretty much the only Safeties I am excited about Ted possibly drafting, with the little info we can get as fans. If I were to pick one, it might be Dixon out of Baylor.


For what it's worth, Donte Whitner (the same guy on the 49ers who kept bouncing off Lacy in the wild card game) was the same size in college as Ward.

From what I've seen so far, I'd have to go with either Clinton-Dix or Ward. I'm not sure what's the fascination with Pryor, dude's gonna be racking up concussions fast with the way he tackles. Haven't watched enough of the others.
mi_keys  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:58:19 AM(UTC)
Loved Leonhard at Wisconsin. Walk on guy in college. I believe he was undrafted as well. Everyone always bet against him but here he is with a pretty decent career. He's been a part of some very good defenses.

I don't know how much he has left in the tank. I wouldn't mind bringing him in for training camp as I assume he would be on a veteran minimum (or close to) deal. That said, I wouldn't be expecting Leonhard to be the answer. I'd just hope to be pleasantly surprised.
PackFanWithTwins  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:32:18 PM(UTC)
For what we need at safety, he doesn't now or never has had the speed. We are trying to replace Nick Collins, we need a FS with wheels, not an undersized SS.
Mucky Tundra  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:47:52 AM(UTC)
TBH, would it hurt just to take a look at the guy? A vet with experience and good work ethic who wants to play here. Should we be so quick to turn him down?
play2win  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:52:02 AM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
TBH, would it hurt just to take a look at the guy? A vet with experience and good work ethic who wants to play here. Should we be so quick to turn him down?


I can buy some of that, for team depth at the position. Yeah, why not?
Yerko  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:38:35 AM(UTC)
At this point, I just don't think he is anywhere near the answer for the Packers. He would add the veteran presence and that is about all.

And since it is being talked about, I like Jimmie Ward. His size along with playing in the MAC will be what most use against him to not consider him higher in the draft but I think the kid can play football.

Similar sized safety I was interested in last year, Matt Elam. Clearly, a different caliber player but just for measurables sake.
Mucky Tundra  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:45:22 AM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
At this point, I just don't think he is anywhere near the answer for the Packers. He would add the veteran presence and that is about all.

And since it is being talked about, I like Jimmie Ward. His size along with playing in the MAC will be what most use against him to not consider him higher in the draft but I think the kid can play football.

Similar sized safety I was interested in last year, Matt Elam. Clearly, a different caliber player but just for measurables sake.


Yerko, I watched a video with all of Ward's snaps vs Florida State from the 2012 Orange Bowl(?) and was VERY impressed. I'd be very happy if they landed him.
mi_keys  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:04:58 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
I can buy some of that, for team depth at the position. Yeah, why not?


Hell, he had 4 interceptions more than our entire safety group did combined last year. We can't do any worse.
DoddPower  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:36:44 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
Hell, he had 4 interceptions more than our entire safety group did combined last year. We can't do any worse.


True, he might be a slight improvement, but I think the Packers can do MUCH better than a slow, aging, undersized safety. If the Packers sign him for some reason, I hope it doesn't alter their plans of finding another really good safety in the slightest.

I'd rather develop Hyde at the position than Leonhard, too. The Packers don't need more players of Leonhard's caliber. They need more big, strong, fast, and talented players to ever rise above average, imo.
play2win  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:56:13 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
True, he might be a slight improvement, but I think the Packers can do MUCH better than a slow, aging, undersized safety. If the Packers sign him for some reason, I hope it doesn't alter their plans of finding another really good safety in the slightest.

I'd rather develop Hyde at the position than Leonhard, too. The Packers don't need more players of Leonhard's caliber. They need more big, strong, fast, and talented players to ever rise above average, imo.


You know DoddPower, I've thought a lot about Hyde switching to S, and with his insanely good instincts, it could be a really good move.

I agree with what you are saying in our Safeties added needing to be bigger and faster. At least, that is what I prefer. We need blue chip talents back there, and I'm questioning Morgan Burnett, sadly.

LeRoy Butler was talking up the Dixon kid from Baylor recently, saying that would be his pick. I tend to agree.
mi_keys  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:34:21 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
True, he might be a slight improvement, but I think the Packers can do MUCH better than a slow, aging, undersized safety. If the Packers sign him for some reason, I hope it doesn't alter their plans of finding another really good safety in the slightest.

I'd rather develop Hyde at the position than Leonhard, too. The Packers don't need more players of Leonhard's caliber. They need more big, strong, fast, and talented players to ever rise above average, imo.


I don't think anyone here is suggesting that we forego adding further depth to safety if we pick up Leonhard. At least I hope not.

According to spotrac, Leonhard was on a salary of $840K with a cap hit of $555K; there doesn't seem to have been any guaranteed money. Assuming any deal he signs for this coming year will be similar, we could essentially sign him risk free to bring him into camp for more competition.

If he can come in and win a backup spot, great. He can come in and help bring along a rookie, Hyde or anyone else we bring in; and he would be an adequate backup if he can still play at or close to the level he has been playing at for most of his career, in spite of his small stature and non-existent pace (he's played through those two limitations his entire career).

From 2008 to 2010 he started on and contributed to defenses that finished 3rd, 1st and 6th in scoring. He was never the centerpiece, only a cog in the machine, but he knows what it takes to operate a defense at an elite level. When many of us are clamoring for veteran leadership, I don't see how bringing in a guy like this can hurt.

Besides, he's a Badger and Wisconsinite; and I'm a sucker for a good homecoming.

Source:
http://www.spotrac.com/n...falo-bills/jim-leonhard/
DoddPower  
#16 Posted : Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:36:39 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think anyone here is suggesting that we forego adding further depth to safety if we pick up Leonhard. At least I hope not.

According to spotrac, Leonhard was on a salary of $840K with a cap hit of $555K; there doesn't seem to have been any guaranteed money. Assuming any deal he signs for this coming year will be similar, we could essentially sign him risk free to bring him into camp for more competition.

If he can come in and win a backup spot, great. He can come in and help bring along a rookie, Hyde or anyone else we bring in; and he would be an adequate backup if he can still play at or close to the level he has been playing at for most of his career, in spite of his small stature and non-existent pace (he's played through those two limitations his entire career).

From 2008 to 2010 he started on and contributed to defenses that finished 3rd, 1st and 6th in scoring. He was never the centerpiece, only a cog in the machine, but he knows what it takes to operate a defense at an elite level. When many of us are clamoring for veteran leadership, I don't see how bringing in a guy like this can hurt.

Besides, he's a Badger and Wisconsinite; and I'm a sucker for a good homecoming.

Source:
http://www.spotrac.com/n...falo-bills/jim-leonhard/


I can understand some of the logic, but I'd rather pass. I suppose it's not a bad fall-back plan if the Packers can't sign a starting free safety in free agency. But I'm hoping they can. At that point, I'd rather focus on drafting and developing guys behind Burnett and the free agent safety. Having a 32 year old small and slow back up safety doesn't excite me much. Now if the Packers don't add a starting safety in free agency and decide to look to the draft, then he could be a possibility. But still, I'd much rather see more talent added to the safety group, rather than a cheap, old, and marginally talented player. I wouldn't even mind signing a top free agency safety AND drafting one of the top safeties. The Packers need much more talent at the position.

To be fair, though, he does seem like a Ted Thompson type of signing. It's just not one that I would care for.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (15m) : Bakh and Bulaga active. Linsley, too. Lane Taylor, Out.
buckeyepackfan (34m) : Looks pretty clear after that
buckeyepackfan (34m) : Radar showing another band of showers probably within the hour.
Zero2Cool (46m) : and now its not raining at all
Zero2Cool (1h) : Right now it's just rain. Not light, not pouring.
buckeyepackfan (1h) : Light showers? Or heavy downpour?
Zero2Cool (1h) : It's raining in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (4h) : @RapSheet just said on NFL Morning the org does NOT expect 12 to return due to significant break.
uffda udfa (4h) : Schefter reporting doctors believe 12 can resume throwing in 6 weeks.
uffda udfa (5h) : Since 2008, Packers 3-7-1 without Aaron Rodgers
buckeyepackfan (5h) : The Brett Hundley era starts today! May it be a short successful run!
buckeyepackfan (5h) : GAMEDAY!
buckeyepackfan (5h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
uffda udfa (7h) : Fans always say we have great WRs. This data contradicts that sentiment in a big way. It's interesting.
uffda udfa (7h) : Data is the data. Misconception that our WRs are one if best groups in NFL.
Zero2Cool (14h) : You sure throw a lot of labels that no one else does and you do it as if everyone does. hyperbolic?
uffda udfa (15h) : Here's the frame of reference: https://twitter.com/MattHarmon_BYB/status/921888189475831808
uffda udfa (15h) : "Great" Packers WR corps rates toward bottom of NFL in separation: https://twitter.com/MattHarmon_BYB/status/921892861313871872
uffda udfa (16h) : Z, is site traffic way down because 12 is OUT?
uffda udfa (21-Oct) : Or...maybe, Detroit, who has won here one time in 25 years or so.
uffda udfa (21-Oct) : Ravens... we're home and they're one offense our D can stop.
Mucky Tundra (21-Oct) : Bears, Browns and...?
uffda udfa (20-Oct) : Yes...8 weeks from now... Hundley has to lead us to 2-3 wins for us to have reasonable shot
gbguy20 (20-Oct) : Is he eligible at that time?
uffda udfa (20-Oct) : Packers holding out hope 12 is back for game at Carolina.
uffda udfa (20-Oct) : Rodgers to IR
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : ILB Jake Ryan was fined $18,231 for his horse-collar penalty against the
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : Vikings LB Anthony Barr wasn't fined for the hit that injured Aaron Rodgers -- but was fined $9,115 for head-butting Davante Adams.
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : Vikings WR Laquon Treadwell was fined $24,309 for his blindside block on Lenzy Pipkins.
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : NaVorro Bowman signed with the #Raiders on Monday. Last night, he played 60 of the 62 defensive snaps and recorded a game-high 11 tackles.
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : Seahawks officially placed DL Cliff Avril on injured reserve.
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : it breaks the shout div
uffda udfa (20-Oct) : Couldn't resist, Z... https://twitter.com/JoeBanner13/status/921425194522202112
Zero2Cool (20-Oct) : OT Bryan Bulaga cleared the concussion protoco
Mucky Tundra (20-Oct) : then again, I maybe too optimistic for my own good :/
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

21-Oct / Around The NFL / Dulak

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

Headlines