You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Online wpr  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:28:15 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,883
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,416
Applause Received: 1,202

Rob Demovsky wrote:
When the NFL releases its schedule each April, Green Bay Packers coach Mike McCarthy usually looks first at how many regular seven-day weeks he will have to prepare his team.

He prefers to keep things on a normal schedule. Games on Monday or Thursday nights throw that off.

So McCarthy likely won't be bothered or concerned that his team in 2014 will play the 13th-toughest schedule in the NFL based on opponents' records from last season. The Packers' 2014 opponents had a combined winning percentage of.


It amazes me that people want to look at last season to decide what the strength of schedule is for the up coming season.

Things change. Teams change. Injuries happen. Players improve. Others digress. Draft picks are added tot he roster. Coaching changes and schemes occur. Last year doesn't reflect on what this season will bring.

The 1967 Packers won the Super Bowl. 1968 they didn't even finish .500.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Sponsor
Offline mi_keys  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:05:58 PM(UTC)
mi_keys

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,318
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 142
Applause Received: 220

Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
It amazes me that people want to look at last season to decide what the strength of schedule is for the up coming season.

Things change. Teams change. Injuries happen. Players improve. Others digress. Draft picks are added tot he roster. Coaching changes and schemes occur. Last year doesn't reflect on what this season will bring.

The 1967 Packers won the Super Bowl. 1968 they didn't even finish .500.


Yeah, it's only one point of reference and without context it can be quite misleading. But it's easy to calculate and spit out with zero thought or effort so that's why we it's used for strength of schedule.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Offline steveishere  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:49:46 PM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,242
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 27
Applause Received: 600

SOS is never really so drastically different across the league that it will have much account for how a teams season went. Good teams usually make the playoffs and bad teams usually don't regardless of individual schedules.
Offline sschind  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:10:24 AM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 756
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 313

One exception for a brutal schedule might just be the Raiders. Not only do they have 2 each against the Broncos, Chargers and Chiefs they also play the NFC west for games against the Seahawks, 49ers, Cardinals and Rams plus a game against the Patriots. Those are all really tough games for them. The remaining teams are the Dolphins, Bills, Jets, Browns and Jags.

The Raiders have my early vote for the #1 pick in 2015. Are there any decent QBs coming out then? Can they afford to pass on one this year and land an impact player somewhere else or trade down and load up?

I fully respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline Yerko  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:45:57 AM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,850
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL

Applause Given: 110
Applause Received: 197

These SOS rankings are just as important as power rankings the week after the Super Bowl...
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 2/12/2014(UTC)
Online wpr  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:49:33 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,883
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,416
Applause Received: 1,202

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
One exception for a brutal schedule might just be the Raiders. Not only do they have 2 each against the Broncos, Chargers and Chiefs they also play the NFC west for games against the Seahawks, 49ers, Cardinals and Rams plus a game against the Patriots. Those are all really tough games for them. The remaining teams are the Dolphins, Bills, Jets, Browns and Jags.

The Raiders have my early vote for the #1 pick in 2015. Are there any decent QBs coming out then? Can they afford to pass on one this year and land an impact player somewhere else or trade down and load up?



It is funny you should mention the Raiders.

Yesterday I was reading their 2015 projections on Walter's site.

They are expecting Oakland to go first.



Quote:
1. Oakland Raiders: Marcus Mariota, QB, Oregon

2014 NFL Mock Draft selection: Sammy Watkins, WR

With the Texans, Jaguars and Browns all needing quarterbacks, the Raiders could be out of luck by the time they're on the clock this May. If they can't trade up and refuse to reach on Derek Carr, they may have to wait a year to find a potential franchise quarterback. Luckily for them, the 2015 class is more fruitful at this position.

It's a close call between Marcus Mariota and Jameis Winston, but the former has a slight edge right now. With most things being equal, Mariota is clean off the field.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.131 seconds.