Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
6 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline play2win  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 8:28:17 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
Just a hunch. He fits a 3-4 DE perfectly, just what we need. And Trgo was his line coach and DC while in CAR. He knows him well. 7.5 sacks last season and 2 FFs.

That's one piece of the puzzle I would like to see here in GB, even at 34 years old. The guy can still play.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
texaspackerbacker on 3/12/2014(UTC), Zero2Cool on 3/15/2014(UTC)
Sponsor
Offline DarkaneRules  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 8:30:41 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 231
Applause Received: 391
Bold prediction. Pick is 34 too. We picked him up as a FA long ago at this point. I am not sure Ted ever signs a guy over 30 from another team.
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 8:41:53 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: Member
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 192
He's 34. Never played a 3-4 DE to my knowledge. He's more of a pass rushing threat than a hold the line and take on blockers guy. So he really doesn't fit the Caper's mold for DE's.

Other than all of that...
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DoddPower on 3/12/2014(UTC), porky88 on 3/12/2014(UTC)
Offline Yerko  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 8:48:44 AM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 176
Applause Received: 296
Peppers is old and takes a lot more plays off than he did when he was younger. He's still going to demand the bigger contract, even at 34. He played in a 3-4 in Carolina (I believe) and wasn't really that much of a fit.

Now, if the Packers were able to get him for a decent price, sure...but I don't think that is going to be the case with him.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:08:09 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 521
Applause Received: 360
I'm for signing him - cheap, maybe with incentives. He seemed like he could still play in bursts last year. We don't need him to be an every down player. The way the Packers D is evolving - getting away from big fatties, a DE capable of rushing the passer is ideal. Imagine him on the same side as Matthews. Who are you gonna double team?
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:13:40 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 551
Peppers has been successful as an Edge rusher, I don't think he would be effective playing inside. And when we drop in to pass defense he would need to be on the edge, the same edge Matthews is best at.
Online Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:18:09 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,499
Clay Matthews had 13.5 sacks as LOLB in 2010. He is the same player at LOLB and ROLB. Therefore, if the Packers get someone who is a "ringer" at one side, they can move Clay.


2010 and 2011 30 games LOLB
Games: 30
Sacks: 19.5
QB Hit: 34
QB Hurries: 88


2012 and 2013 ROLB
Games: 23
Sacks: 20.5
QB Hit: 18
QB Hurries: 46
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DoddPower on 3/12/2014(UTC), Mucky Tundra on 3/12/2014(UTC)
Offline play2win  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:52:58 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
He's 34. Never played a 3-4 DE to my knowledge. He's more of a pass rushing threat than a hold the line and take on blockers guy. So he really doesn't fit the Caper's mold for DE's.

Other than all of that...


He only had 81 sacks over an 8 years span playing in CAR's 3-4. Another 38 in 4 years with CHI in their 4-3.

Yeah, he's old, but may be of great service as a situational specialist at DE. Think this guy doesn't want a ring?
thanks Post received 1 applause.
texaspackerbacker on 3/12/2014(UTC)
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:05:19 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: Member
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 192
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
He only had 81 sacks over an 8 years span playing in CAR's 3-4. Another 38 in 4 years with CHI in their 4-3.

Yeah, he's old, but may be of great service as a situational specialist at DE.


My bad. I wasn't sure what Carolina ran back then.

But he's 34. Can't play Special Teams. Could be intriguing when Packers go to 2 DL, pair him with Daniels to rush. But he's 34.

He would instantly be the oldest player on the Packers. By 4 years. Not exactly TT's type of player; i.e young and cheap.
Offline play2win  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:19:26 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
My bad. I wasn't sure what Carolina ran back then.

But he's 34. Can't play Special Teams. Could be intriguing when Packers go to 2 DL, pair him with Daniels to rush. But he's 34.

He would instantly be the oldest player on the Packers. By 4 years. Not exactly TT's type of player; i.e young and cheap.


Yeah, you're right. He is out of Ted's age wheelhouse. I posted this before seeing Chris Clemons was released by SEA. I can't believe that. Clemons is 32, with 39 sacks over the last 4 seasons... I would sign him immediately. Could probably get both Clemons and Peppers for less than what Byrd got. But, Clemons is outside of the age bracket as well...

Personally, I think that needs to change with Ted. Get some true veteran leadership in the house. Can't do it signing only young players. They can be incredible mentors to the younger talents we draft.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 3/12/2014(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:21:14 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 551
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Clay Matthews had 13.5 sacks as LOLB in 2010. He is the same player at LOLB and ROLB. Therefore, if the Packers get someone who is a "ringer" at one side, they can move Clay.


2010 and 2011 30 games LOLB
Games: 30
Sacks: 19.5
QB Hit: 34
QB Hurries: 88


2012 and 2013 ROLB
Games: 23
Sacks: 20.5
QB Hit: 18
QB Hurries: 46


He has played some at LOLB, but he has been predominately our ROLB. He has always been more productive from the Right.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:25:56 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 551
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
He only had 81 sacks over an 8 years span playing in CAR's 3-4. Another 38 in 4 years with CHI in their 4-3.

Yeah, he's old, but may be of great service as a situational specialist at DE. Think this guy doesn't want a ring?


Pro-Football-Reference shows CAR as a 4-3 while Peppers was there.
Offline Yerko  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:02:16 AM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 176
Applause Received: 296
Let's see if Ted Thompson matches this...

"Filed to ESPN: Pending a physical, former Cowboys DE DeMarcus Ware reached agreement with Broncos on 3-year, $30M contract include $20M gtd."

Lol...[laughing]


I'm sorry, that is absolutely ridiculous. Denver now has 2 huge guaranteed contracts on two guys that haven't finished the past couple seasons.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:07:15 PM(UTC)
Laser Gunns

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 283
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
He has played some at LOLB, but he has been predominately our ROLB. He has always been more productive from the Right.


Clay is better at ROLB
Perry is better at LOLB


WHY HAVE WE NOT FLIPPED THEM!?

God our staff is stupid.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:09:49 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 551
Laser Gunns said: Go to Quoted Post
Clay is better at ROLB
Perry is better at LOLB


WHY HAVE WE NOT FLIPPED THEM!?

God our staff is stupid.


That is where they have been playing. Clay at ROLB, Perry at LOLB
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Grabacr

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere


Tweeter