Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:55:43 PM(UTC)


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)
nerdmann  
#2 Posted : Thursday, April 3, 2014 7:12:06 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)


How many did we lose when Aaron when down? 6? Pretty close to the Patriots.

We need to get and stay healthy. Bottom line.
dhazer  
#3 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 2:02:23 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)


What I find amazing is how the Patriots do it as a team. Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time? They have been slipping the past 2 years they only won 12 games in each season.



The Packers record is very deceiving seeing out of the 4 years we only had 1 that we had more than 12 wins.
yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 2:09:20 PM(UTC)
Nothing sweeter than success!
mi_keys  
#5 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 2:47:31 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
What I find amazing is how the Patriots do it as a team. Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time? They have been slipping the past 2 years they only won 12 games in each season.



The Packers record is very deceiving seeing out of the 4 years we only had 1 that we had more than 12 wins.


How exactly is it misleading? We have 44 wins in 4 years. 11 wins a year. So why would you expect in a sample size of 4 to get a bunch of seasons with over 12 wins if the average is 11?
steveishere  
#6 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 4:52:14 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
What I find amazing is how the Patriots do it as a team. Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time? They have been slipping the past 2 years they only won 12 games in each season.



The Packers record is very deceiving seeing out of the 4 years we only had 1 that we had more than 12 wins.


NE has also only had another team in their division make the playoffs 1 time in that stretch while the NFC N has had 3 and another miss the playoffs with 10 wins. I don't really see the huge difference between 11 wins and 12 wins if it gets you in the playoffs either way.
DakotaT  
#7 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 6:36:47 PM(UTC)
All that list says to me is that the Packers, Ravens, and Saints won a Super Bowl - the rest of them just won games.
Mucky Tundra  
#8 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 7:25:27 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time?


Kenbrell Thompkins Flapper \:d/
sschind  
#9 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 9:31:05 PM(UTC)
Whenever I see stats like this I always wonder why they chose that particular year. Why choose 2010. Why not 2009 or 2008 or 2011?

Of those on the list only the Saints had more wins than the Packers in 2009 so it would look even better for the Packers if they went back to 2009. Can't do 2008 though because we only won 6 games that year.
DoddPower  
#10 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:31:57 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
How exactly is it misleading? We have 44 wins in 4 years. 11 wins a year. So why would you expect in a sample size of 4 to get a bunch of seasons with over 12 wins if the average is 11?


Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.
DoddPower  
#11 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:33:48 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Whenever I see stats like this I always wonder why they chose that particular year. Why choose 2010. Why not 2009 or 2008 or 2011?

Of those on the list only the Saints had more wins than the Packers in 2009 so it would look even better for the Packers if they went back to 2009. Can't do 2008 though because we only won 6 games that year.


Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.
mi_keys  
#12 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:52:29 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.


I know. I've been here long enough to know he does that. Doesn't mean I don't like pointing out the bullshit.
dhazer  
#13 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:58:28 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.




ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol
mi_keys  
#14 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 4:05:05 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol


Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.
dhazer  
#15 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 4:17:44 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.


Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average
mi_keys  
#16 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 4:47:33 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average


Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.
nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 9:13:22 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.


1: Get in.

2: Get a week off.

3: Get a home game.

4: Home field advantage.
sschind  
#18 Posted : Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:37:41 AM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.


Yeah but usually when they make such comments they are trying to make a specific point about something. If they are trying to show the Packers specifically why not do your full research and go back one more year which would make the stats look even better. Maybe he was trying to show the Patriots in a better light so he chose 2010. That's why I said I wonder why he chose that year. You are right though. It could have just been chosen at random.
buckeyepackfan  
#19 Posted : Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:18:29 AM(UTC)
Composite NFL Standings since the AFL/NFL merger
by organization (not franchise) through team and location changes.
Fall of 1970 through 2/2/2014

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/post1969nfl.html


Or there is this.

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/nfl.htm
play2win  
#20 Posted : Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:24:16 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)


It is pretty impressive, all things considering. And, as nerdmann said, this with Rodgers being out a significant 6 games last season. Now, to better our playoff record. Maybe that starts this season!
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Mike Mayock says this is one of the best defensive drafts he's ever seen, especially at DE, CB & S.
Smokey (4h) : Yellow as the background color for such blocks as Lambeau Field & Lombardi Ave & Recent Topics & Fan Shout .
Zero2Cool (4h) : and thanks FP88 ... glad you enjoy it. :-)
Zero2Cool (4h) : Finally, got my avatar back! Weird!
Zero2Cool (7h) : FP88, :-) its okay. Smokey, yellow where?
FLORIDA PACKER88 (8h) : Didnt realize how much I needed this site in my life until it wasn't available haha! Looks great Zero!
Zero2Cool (22h) : Click the Clear link to force new files to load for style.
Smokey (26-Feb) : A little yellow for contrast maybe ?
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Thanks. Took about 16-20 hours.
wpr (26-Feb) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Feb / Announcements / dhazer

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Feb / Around The NFL / uffda udfa

Headlines