Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:55:43 PM(UTC)


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)
nerdmann  
#2 Posted : Thursday, April 3, 2014 7:12:06 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)


How many did we lose when Aaron when down? 6? Pretty close to the Patriots.

We need to get and stay healthy. Bottom line.
dhazer  
#3 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 2:02:23 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)


What I find amazing is how the Patriots do it as a team. Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time? They have been slipping the past 2 years they only won 12 games in each season.



The Packers record is very deceiving seeing out of the 4 years we only had 1 that we had more than 12 wins.
yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 2:09:20 PM(UTC)
Nothing sweeter than success!
mi_keys  
#5 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 2:47:31 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
What I find amazing is how the Patriots do it as a team. Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time? They have been slipping the past 2 years they only won 12 games in each season.



The Packers record is very deceiving seeing out of the 4 years we only had 1 that we had more than 12 wins.


How exactly is it misleading? We have 44 wins in 4 years. 11 wins a year. So why would you expect in a sample size of 4 to get a bunch of seasons with over 12 wins if the average is 11?
steveishere  
#6 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 4:52:14 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
What I find amazing is how the Patriots do it as a team. Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time? They have been slipping the past 2 years they only won 12 games in each season.



The Packers record is very deceiving seeing out of the 4 years we only had 1 that we had more than 12 wins.


NE has also only had another team in their division make the playoffs 1 time in that stretch while the NFC N has had 3 and another miss the playoffs with 10 wins. I don't really see the huge difference between 11 wins and 12 wins if it gets you in the playoffs either way.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#7 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 6:36:47 PM(UTC)
All that list says to me is that the Packers, Ravens, and Saints won a Super Bowl - the rest of them just won games.
Mucky Tundra  
#8 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 7:25:27 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
Can anyone name a wr other than Welker for the Patriots during that time?


Kenbrell Thompkins Flapper \:d/
sschind  
#9 Posted : Friday, April 4, 2014 9:31:05 PM(UTC)
Whenever I see stats like this I always wonder why they chose that particular year. Why choose 2010. Why not 2009 or 2008 or 2011?

Of those on the list only the Saints had more wins than the Packers in 2009 so it would look even better for the Packers if they went back to 2009. Can't do 2008 though because we only won 6 games that year.
DoddPower  
#10 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:31:57 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
How exactly is it misleading? We have 44 wins in 4 years. 11 wins a year. So why would you expect in a sample size of 4 to get a bunch of seasons with over 12 wins if the average is 11?


Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.
DoddPower  
#11 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:33:48 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Whenever I see stats like this I always wonder why they chose that particular year. Why choose 2010. Why not 2009 or 2008 or 2011?

Of those on the list only the Saints had more wins than the Packers in 2009 so it would look even better for the Packers if they went back to 2009. Can't do 2008 though because we only won 6 games that year.


Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.
mi_keys  
#12 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:52:29 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.


I know. I've been here long enough to know he does that. Doesn't mean I don't like pointing out the bullshit.
dhazer  
#13 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:58:28 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.




ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol
mi_keys  
#14 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 4:05:05 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol


Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.
dhazer  
#15 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 4:17:44 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.


Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average
mi_keys  
#16 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 4:47:33 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average


Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.
nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Saturday, April 5, 2014 9:13:22 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.


1: Get in.

2: Get a week off.

3: Get a home game.

4: Home field advantage.
sschind  
#18 Posted : Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:37:41 AM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.


Yeah but usually when they make such comments they are trying to make a specific point about something. If they are trying to show the Packers specifically why not do your full research and go back one more year which would make the stats look even better. Maybe he was trying to show the Patriots in a better light so he chose 2010. That's why I said I wonder why he chose that year. You are right though. It could have just been chosen at random.
buckeyepackfan  
#19 Posted : Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:18:29 AM(UTC)
Composite NFL Standings since the AFL/NFL merger
by organization (not franchise) through team and location changes.
Fall of 1970 through 2/2/2014

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/post1969nfl.html


Or there is this.

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/nfl.htm
play2win  
#20 Posted : Sunday, April 6, 2014 6:24:16 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


  1. Patriots (51-13)
  2. Packers (44-19-1)
  3. 49ers (42-21-1)
  4. Ravens (42-22)
  5. Saints (42-22)
  6. Falcons (40-24)
  7. Steelers (40-24)


It is pretty impressive, all things considering. And, as nerdmann said, this with Rodgers being out a significant 6 games last season. Now, to better our playoff record. Maybe that starts this season!
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (now) : @Michael_Cohen13 Kevin King has been standing on the sideline for a few plays now. #Packers have been rolling with House and Hawkins. Not su
Zero2Cool (45m) : Justin McCray will start at LG today. What a ride for him the last two years. Arena Football League, free agent/unemployed, #Packers starter
yooperfan (46m) : Here we go gang!!!!
Zero2Cool (54m) : WR willie snead OUT
musccy (1h) : no worries...appreciate the pointers to find it.
Zero2Cool (1h) : i couldn't find another alternative so ... no more feed here
Zero2Cool (1h) : ya justin.tv flipped their vision on streaming
musccy (1h) : just did, thanks zero. Used to use Justin...not sure they work anymore
Zero2Cool (1h) : sure is gusty winds here i can hear the wind blowing an rain falling
Zero2Cool (1h) : check the top thread in packers forum section
musccy (1h) : Thanks zero!
Zero2Cool (1h) : http://goatdee.net/ <-- usually has good links
Zero2Cool (1h) : muscy, nerdmann usually has al ink in chat
Zero2Cool (1h) : and the tarp is back on the field
musccy (1h) : dumb question...ways to watch game online? Don't want to wait for game pass tonight
uffda udfa (2h) : Bakh and Bulaga active. Linsley, too. Lane Taylor, Out.
buckeyepackfan (2h) : Looks pretty clear after that
buckeyepackfan (2h) : Radar showing another band of showers probably within the hour.
Zero2Cool (2h) : and now its not raining at all
Zero2Cool (3h) : Right now it's just rain. Not light, not pouring.
buckeyepackfan (3h) : Light showers? Or heavy downpour?
Zero2Cool (3h) : It's raining in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (6h) : @RapSheet just said on NFL Morning the org does NOT expect 12 to return due to significant break.
uffda udfa (6h) : Schefter reporting doctors believe 12 can resume throwing in 6 weeks.
uffda udfa (7h) : Since 2008, Packers 3-7-1 without Aaron Rodgers
buckeyepackfan (7h) : The Brett Hundley era starts today! May it be a short successful run!
buckeyepackfan (7h) : GAMEDAY!
buckeyepackfan (7h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
uffda udfa (9h) : Fans always say we have great WRs. This data contradicts that sentiment in a big way. It's interesting.
uffda udfa (9h) : Data is the data. Misconception that our WRs are one if best groups in NFL.
Zero2Cool (16h) : You sure throw a lot of labels that no one else does and you do it as if everyone does. hyperbolic?
uffda udfa (17h) : Here's the frame of reference: https://twitter.com/MattHarmon_BYB/status/921888189475831808
uffda udfa (17h) : "Great" Packers WR corps rates toward bottom of NFL in separation: https://twitter.com/MattHarmon_BYB/status/921892861313871872
uffda udfa (18h) : Z, is site traffic way down because 12 is OUT?
uffda udfa (21-Oct) : Or...maybe, Detroit, who has won here one time in 25 years or so.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

21-Oct / Around The NFL / Dulak

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

Headlines