Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
10 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DGB454  
#16 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 4:36:14 PM(UTC)
DGB454

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 11/18/2007(UTC)
Location: At home
Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 7
Fantastic bit of news. Thanks for the heads up guys.
Offline Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 4:37:49 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 409
Applause Received: 1,110
This is the Aaron Rodgers re-upped thread.. wanna scream about it and how you think it is a mistake.. take it here... I culled a couple of the off topic posts and got the ball rolling for ya.. have a blast.

http://www.packershome.c...wtopic&p=26051#26051

I want to see the contract numbers.. how front loaded is it.. more the better.
Offline MassPackersFan  
#18 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 4:39:25 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
They could have killed two birds with one stone too. Extend him plus throw in some incentives he won't reach. That'd be pretty sweet.
Offline HoustonMatt  
#19 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 4:53:35 PM(UTC)
HoustonMatt

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/1/2008(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post


I want to see the contract numbers.. how front loaded is it.. more the better.


This contract will assuredly be as front loaded as possible in order to count against this year's cap to the greatest extent. There are some stipulations though. For example: let's say the extension was 5 yrs/$50 million. We couldn't pay him $20 million this year and spread the remaining $30 million over the next 4 years for a $7.5 million per year average. Per Andrew Brandt, a player's salary cannot be more than 50% more than the following year.

But, rest assured, it will be as front loaded as possible in order to use as much of our available cap room this year as we can.
Offline MassPackersFan  
#20 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 4:55:22 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post


I want to see the contract numbers.. how front loaded is it.. more the better.


This contract will assuredly be as front loaded as possible in order to count against this year's cap to the greatest extent. There are some stipulations though. For example: let's say the extension was 5 yrs/$50 million. We couldn't pay him $20 million this year and spread the remaining $30 million over the next 4 years for a $7.5 million per year average. Per Andrew Brandt, a player's salary cannot be more than 50% more than the following year.

But, rest assured, it will be as front loaded as possible in order to use as much of our available cap room this year as we can.


That's quality info. +1
Offline RaiderPride  
#21 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 4:59:58 PM(UTC)
RaiderPride

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 157
Applause Received: 237
Good For Aaron. Good for the Packers. Good Job Ted.
Offline walleye  
#22 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 5:05:29 PM(UTC)
walleye

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Offline shanks2122  
#23 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 5:12:42 PM(UTC)
shanks2122

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/10/2008(UTC)
Location: Billings, MT
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 5
outstanding!!!!!!!!!!
Offline Cheesey  
#24 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 5:46:53 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 538
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post


Roddyboy-- My kneejerk reaction to your post would be the suggestion that you go find some other team to try and truly root for, but upon reflection I realized there are no current NFL franchises in outer space.

+1

+ another 1.
I darn near pee'd myself!!!

Dfost my man..........you have shown a RARE quality of "cheeseyness" that makes me PROUD!!! thumbleft: thumbleft: thumbleft: thumbrightt: thumbrightt: thumbrightt:
Offline Cheesey  
#25 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 5:48:24 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 538
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think we have to worry about violating the salary cap minimum anymore. icon_smilee:

Roddyboy-- My kneejerk reaction to your post would be the suggestion that you go find some other team to try and truly root for, but upon reflection I realized there are no current NFL franchises in outer space.

Is that true?
I heard there was on on "Uranus".

LOLOLOLOL!!!!!

Anyway........WHOO HOO!!!
We have Rodgers locked up, now onto Jennings!!! thumbrightt:
Offline RaiderPride  
#26 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 6:06:01 PM(UTC)
RaiderPride

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 157
Applause Received: 237
$20 MILLION GUARANTEED FOR RODGERS
Posted by Mike Florio on October 31, 2008, 4:46 p.m. EDT
The contract signed Friday by Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers pay him big money. But not huge money.

But wed take it if we could get it.

According to Adam Schefter of NFL Network, Rodgers will receive $20 million guaranteed on a six-year, $65 million deal.

The contract falls short of the deal signed last year by Tony Romo of the Cowboys, wholl receiver $67 million over six years, and who got $30 million guaranteed. And Romos deal was criticized in some circles for not pushing north the high-water mark for high-end quarterbacks.

After three years of sitting on the bench (and losing plenty of money via unachievable play-time incentives), Rodgers likely opted to take what he could get now in lieu of pushing for free agency after the 2009 season.

Absent an extension to the CBA, Rodgers would have been eligible for restricted free agency only after next season, because the rules of the uncapped year (set for 2010) require players to have six or more seasons in order to achieve unrestricted free agency.
Offline Roddyboy  
#27 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 6:08:00 PM(UTC)
Roddyboy

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Yawn....
Offline HoustonMatt  
#28 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 6:14:27 PM(UTC)
HoustonMatt

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/1/2008(UTC)
Those numbers look about right. The guaranteed money is actually lower than I expected, so that mitigates a lot of the risk. Good job, TT!
Offline gbpfan  
#29 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 6:46:45 PM(UTC)
gbpfan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Location: milwaukee
Applause Received: 3
glad they at least have one taken care of icon_smilee:
Offline dhazer  
#30 Posted : Friday, October 31, 2008 6:49:53 PM(UTC)
dhazer

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 65
Applause Received: 238
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
He should have honored his current contract and played it out.

(This will be the undoing of Ted Thompson....guaranteed!)


Hmmm didn't the Packers keep extending another QB through the 90's and into this century well in advance to his contract expiring.. pretty damn sure they did.

That is smart money.. if the duck quacks like a duck, walks like a duck and can throw the damn football like an NFL QB.. you lock his arse up.

Look for the same positive FA effect this team has with a solid NFL QB in the fold.. glad they got this deal done.


Theres a huge difference pack and they kept redoing his contract because he would take pay cuts to sign free agents. i don't agree with it but i do agree with roddy on this way to early for this 8 games into a career and you throw the bank at him this could be the end of Ted Thompson (thank god maybe we can stop planning for the future) oh wait thats what he just did.



how can you say a solid qb with a 4-3 record? and thanks for the laugh you brought up free agency and green bay in the same sentence lol. Ted Thompson and free agents don't go together.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
10 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter