Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
packersfan101101  
#41 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:34:55 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
um grant had his best looking game of the year. if anyone looked bad today it was jennings. he played with his head in his ass it seemed like.


well if this the best were gona see then i think were skrewed

anyways.. i realize that i am the only one that thinks grant played bad today but i will still stick to that. Grant just hasnt got the job done. 88 yards is decent but with that new constract he should be getting more than that
RaiderPride  
#42 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:36:54 PM(UTC)
I am one of the biggest GRANT DOUBT MONGERS on this forum.

However, I thought he did "OK" today.

The Titans are a very good team with a very good "D"
Packnic  
#43 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:40:36 PM(UTC)
Grant played well. It was against one of the very premier rush defenses in the league. and he continually gained extra yardage after contact.


this thread is dumb.
longtimefan  
#44 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:44:47 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
um grant had his best looking game of the year. if anyone looked bad today it was jennings. he played with his head in his ass it seemed like.


well if this the best were gona see then i think were skrewed

anyways.. i realize that i am the only one that thinks grant played bad today but i will still stick to that. Grant just hasnt got the job done. 88 yards is decent but with that new constract he should be getting more than that


Ryan had a long of 14 and 20 carries take away his long run Ryan got 3.7 per carry


Adrian Peterson vs the Titans

18 carries 80 yards 4.4 yards per carry with long of 28

Take away his long and he got 3 per carry
packersfan101101  
#45 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:47:10 PM(UTC)
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha
longtimefan  
#46 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:54:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha


Well my gawd man...

He really did not have a bad game at all..He had a good game..

It IS not his fault that Mike McCarthy decided not to use him effectively at the end
packersfan101101  
#47 Posted : Sunday, November 2, 2008 11:59:42 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha


Well my gawd man...

He really did not have a bad game at all..He had a good game..

It IS not his fault that Mike McCarthy decided not to use him effectively at the end


i disagree with the "good game " part, but yea ur right about the mike McCarthy thing. that is true i didnt think of that.

i think that Mike McCarthy is a good coach, but alot of the time i dont agree with his play calling
longtimefan  
#48 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 12:04:33 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
well this has turned into a diss me, love grant thread haha


Well my gawd man...

He really did not have a bad game at all..He had a good game..

It IS not his fault that Mike McCarthy decided not to use him effectively at the end


i disagree with the "good game " part, but yea ur right about the mike McCarthy thing. that is true i didnt think of that.

i think that Mike McCarthy is a good coach, but alot of the time i dont agree with his play calling


if your mad about him making big money and not performing, then make a thread about Rodgers he performed worse IMO
packersfan101101  
#49 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 12:11:15 AM(UTC)
i think aaron rodger performed fine, except for that 1 deep pass that resulted in an interception, that was a bad decision
TengoJuego  
#50 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 12:26:24 AM(UTC)
Aaron still continues to hold the ball longer than he should. I wish he would run more too.
TimeToThink  
#51 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 4:07:10 AM(UTC)
Personally, I thought Grant played well today.

In fact, while watching the game, on more than one occasion, I said, "Man, Grant is playing much better"

Over 4 yards a carry is pretty decent against nearly any run defense. Against the Titans, it's very good.

Grant was not the reason for our loss. Sure, you could make the argument that if he had a spectacular game, we would have won. But you could make that argument about every player on the field.

If Rodgers played better, we would have won. If Woodson picked off a pass and returned it for a TD, we would have won. If Jennings only broke a few tackles and ran for a TD, we would have won. Etc. Etc.
warhawk  
#52 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 2:25:33 PM(UTC)
Not one comment here about the fact Clifton was a late scratch and that meant two moves at the last minute for the O line?

Geez, this is a tough crowd. It's one thing when a guy is injured and you have the week to work the starters, especially when your playing one of the top defensive units in the game.

For what it was worth, and I know they rotate and work these guys in during the week, but as far as the O line goes the two weeks off and the extra prep time went out the window when Clifton couldn't start.

We threw a rookie in there and Colledge did a decent job but he's not Clifton and anyone thinking this didn't have some affect is kidding themselves. Especially when you consider the amount of stunts those guys run.

I thought we got as much out of them and the running game as we could expect. Do you know how many +10 yard gains the Titans have allowed all year going into this game? TWELVE.

Grant had three. I think expectations around here run a little beyond high.
Since69  
#53 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 2:57:01 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
He ran well today but he couldn't catch a cold in antartica


I agree. I was stunned when to find that he's only caught four passes all year...
gbpfan  
#54 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:14:35 PM(UTC)
i liked what grant did in the game you could tell he was a little frustrated when he was tackled at the 50 but i thought jackson was good too i think we were one of the better teams that the titans faced and when the front can give a-rod more time and he had some of that yesterday think they did okay
TOPackerFan  
#55 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:32:55 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post


We threw a rookie in there and Colledge did a decent job but he's not Clifton


You're right, he's better (at least in the run game).
thetombradyhater  
#56 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 11:34:07 PM(UTC)
Considering my lowered expectations after the beginning of this season and the fact that we were playing arguably the best defense in the league, I was actually pretty satisfied with Grant's performance.
TheEngineer  
#57 Posted : Tuesday, November 4, 2008 12:50:11 AM(UTC)
It looks like Grant's slowly but surely getting back into his groove. We'll see next week against another good run defense team in Minnesota how well he can play.
packersfan101101  
#58 Posted : Tuesday, November 4, 2008 1:08:35 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post


Grant had three. I think expectations around here run a little beyond high.


and they rightfully should be high, the packers are a talented well coached team
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (14h) : Per Schefter: Former Skins DT Ricky Jean Francois signed a one-year, $3M deal with Packers, per source.
uffda udfa (14h) : Per Schefter: FormerSkins DT Ricky Jean Francois signed a one-year, $3M deal with Packers, per source.
Zero2Cool (19h) : lol by .01 not what i thought
Zero2Cool (19h) : he's faster than Montgomery
uffda udfa (22-Mar) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (22-Mar) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Nope. I don't care to read up on Vikings players. :-)
Bnoble (15-Mar) : Anyone see any numbers on Jones deal?
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Datone to Minnesota.
musccy (14-Mar) : A more $ than I'd prefer, but still glad Elliott is back
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19h / Announcements / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

23-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23-Mar / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Mar / Around The NFL / Smokey

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

Headlines