Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages«<23

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
dfosterf  
#61 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:05:27 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.
Formo  
#62 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:08:36 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)
Rockmolder  
#63 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:13:18 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


Erm... what's a nickel? Lol.
dfosterf  
#64 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:13:47 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


If you are trying to say that they will either expand the existing playbook or start using installs that they might have had but never used, I would have agreed with that right away. To say that TJack's difficulties were due to an overly sophisticated playbook, or too big of one...that is completely false. That's all. Chilly's installs have been one day deals since he got there. You can say it's the QB's--I have no problem with the whys--- Just pointing out the what.

Yes--I think Chilly will go to a more sophisticated offense with Brett.

I also think Chilly is gutless for not staying with what he had. Your boy TJack suffered growing pains. I thought this could easily be his year. He is apparently not the brightest bulb on the tree, but he didn't need to be. P.P.O. might rag his ass, but that don't make 'em right over there. You guys have been throwing people under the bus for years. Sage looked good, TJack not so fantastic, but still the great athlete that he is. I love his arm and mobility, for example.

TJack has happy feet. He needs better coaching. He didn't develop overnight...sorry. You fools will not know what could have happened, because you panicked. I understand Chilly panicking, because his fans always have. It's like the whole damn franchise is teetering on the brink of obscurity because the fanbase runs the show--or the lack of a fanbase.

(Not talking about PPO in that regard, but they are in the minority--can't sell out a play-off game for cripes sake)

Your team might have had a future if only the FO had some mettle. Fortunately, they do not.

Someone is very likely to get an outstanding QB of the future at your expense. This is not a new outlook from one of your "typical Puker fans"so many of those fellow assholes at PPO like to stereotype. It is the same views I gave over there to your 8000+ buddies..for over a year.

I think this was stupid and am quite pleased about it...still.

(For clarification purposes, lol)
Formo  
#65 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:26:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


If you are trying to say that they will either expand the existing playbook or start using installs that they might have had but never used, I would have agreed with that right away.


That's what I am saying. =)

" said: Go to Quoted Post
To say that TJack's difficulties were due to an overly sophisticated playbook, or too big of one...that is completely false. That's all.


I just said a lot of the blame is due to that. I think that's only a part of the reason of T-Jack's 'difficulties'.

" said: Go to Quoted Post
Chilly's installs have been one day deals since he got there. You can say it's the QB's--I have no problem with the whys--- Just pointing out the what.


Not sure where you are going with that.. What???? lol

" said: Go to Quoted Post
Yes--I think Chilly will go to a more sophisticated offense with Brett.


Pretty much, again, what I'm saying.
Formo  
#66 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:26:31 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


Erm... what's a nickel? Lol.


?! Who said nickel?
dfosterf  
#67 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:30:49 PM(UTC)
Formo--I edited, so you got more shit to look at.
Rockmolder  
#68 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:33:36 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


Erm... what's a nickel? Lol.


?! Who said nickel?


Can't find it now, but there was a video with Brett asking what a Nickel defense was. That was around his 10th year in the league. Thought it was somewhere in these ESPN soundbites. Couldn't find it, but these are still worth watching. Don't want to kill your conversation with Foster, but a venting video is always nice, lol.

[youtube]HvDOHYy49V0[/youtube]
Formo  
#69 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:43:49 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


If you are trying to say that they will either expand the existing playbook or start using installs that they might have had but never used, I would have agreed with that right away. To say that TJack's difficulties were due to an overly sophisticated playbook, or too big of one...that is completely false. That's all. Chilly's installs have been one day deals since he got there. You can say it's the QB's--I have no problem with the whys--- Just pointing out the what.

Yes--I think Chilly will go to a more sophisticated offense with Brett.

I also think Chilly is gutless for not staying with what he had. Your boy TJack suffered growing pains. I thought this could easily be his year. He is apparently not the brightest bulb on the tree, but he didn't need to be. P.P.O. might rag his ass, but that don't make 'em right over there. You guys have been throwing people under the bus for years. Sage looked good, TJack not so fantastic, but still the great athlete that he is.

TJack has happy feet. He needs better coaching. He didn't develop ovcernight...sorry. You fools will not know what could have happened, because you panicked. I understand Chilly paniking, because his fans always have. It's like the whole damn franchise is teetering on the brink of obscurity because the fanbase runs the show--or the lack of a fanbase.

Your team might have had a future if only the FO had some mettle. Fortunately, they do not.

Someone is very likely to get an outstanding QB of the future at your expense. This is not a new outlook from one of your "typical Puker fans"so many of those fellow assholes at PPO like to stereotype. It is the same views I gave over there to your 8000+ buddies..for over a year.

I think this was stupid and am quite pleased about it...still.

(For clarification purposes, lol)


T-Jack just might be an NFL starting QB. I don't think he is, but he maybe one. One thing I do feel and believe.. He isn't a starting QB in Chilly's offense. The best thing that could happen to T-Jack would be traded to a team that fits his style more (I don't know what style that is, though..)

I'm not seeing any improvement in his poise. Which has always been his bane. I don't know if Sage is the answer, but he very well could be the type of QB the Vikings can use and still be a very successful team. Booty is still an unknown, and I'm 100% ok with him continuing to ride the pine and learn from the vets, and absorb the system. The attraction of Favre, in my view, has a very low risk, with a very high reward. This is less risky than trading for Jared Allen (remember, a 1st, 3rd, and a 6th round pick, and A LOT of cash for an unknown character in Allen?) but has a higher reward factor. If Favre doesn't pan out.. The Vikings loss nothing but maybe T-Jack (which would be best for both parties anyway). Sage is a career backup.. He understands that if Favre doesn't pan, he's the guy stepping in after this year. Meanwhile, the Vikings already took care of the free agent veterans this offseason (Birk, Sharp, etc.).

I think Chilly would be an idiot to stick with T-Jack. Thank goodness he brought in Sage (and eventually Favre), otherwise I'd be calling for his head already, despite last season's success.

I'm not a big Chilly fan. But I can't deny the players he has helped to bring in (Hutch, Allen, Favre, Chester, etc.). Because of that, I'm willing to give him another year before I make anymore decisions on him. Besides, now we can't use the excuse of, "Well, you can't do/expect much with so-in-so at QB.."
Formo  
#70 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:47:23 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What playbook?

That moron chilly has their plays on the back of a matchbook cover.

Cripes, didn't you notice, Favre was on the field for five minutes and was runnin' the show.

He had a tougher time learning the intricacies of that High school team he was farting around with in Hattiesburg the past couple of off-seasons.

:profileleft:


Funny you mention that.

A lot of the blame for the lack of development of T-Jack was put on the fact that Chilly's playbook was bigger than the NYC phonebook.


Then they were wrong.


Or you are afraid to mentally conceive that Favre's mental capacity just may be what the Vikings need behind center. (Lets face it.. T-Jack has proven he's not the QB for Chilly's system.. And Gus is a poor man's Sage.)


Erm... what's a nickel? Lol.


?! Who said nickel?


Can't find it now, but there was a video with Brett asking what a Nickel defense was. That was around his 10th year in the league. Thought it was somewhere in these ESPN soundbites. Couldn't find it, but these are still worth watching. Don't want to kill your conversation with Foster, but a venting video is always nice, lol.

[youtube]HvDOHYy49V0[/youtube]


If he's as goofy playing as a Viking as he was in those clips... My God, this will be entertaining. Haha! Nice find, Rock.
dfosterf  
#71 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:49:34 PM(UTC)
See Rock, no need to panic. Formo and I (and our various buds) have been doing this shit for years, lol.

I think if it's TJack that goes, it will be because of marketability and/or his (totally understandable, imo) request to be the one to go.

If they can get a draft pick for him, they are cutting their losses. I don't think they could get a six pack for Booty.

It is, as always, an opinion.
Formo  
#72 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:53:55 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
See Rock, no need to panic. Formo and I (and our various buds) have been doing this shit for years, lol.

I think if it's TJack that goes, it will be because of marketability and/or his (totally understandable, imo) request to be the one to go.

If they can get a draft pick for him, they are cutting their losses. I don't think they could get a six pack for Booty.

It is, as always, an opinion.


My desire is for T-Jack to be traded, even if it's for a 5-7th rounder. This way they can keep Booty and possibly have him compete in the near future for the franchise QB. And the Vikings could get at least SOMETHING for T-Jack.

Who knows, though.
Rockmolder  
#73 Posted : Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:03:42 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
See Rock, no need to panic. Formo and I (and our various buds) have been doing this shit for years, lol.


Lol. I've seen some heated discussions over here before. And I've posted and read quite a few things on PP.O. They're the same as I am with my friends. People tend to mistake us for enemies half the time. My boss actually asked me if I actually liked the guy I worked with (A friend of mine). (Wouldn't have told so, would you).

Anyway, point is, I didn't think this was some kind of war. I just like some tention releasers. That was a perfect way to put one in.

But thanks for the consideration. Lol.
RedSoxExcel  
#74 Posted : Friday, August 21, 2009 12:23:33 PM(UTC)
Favre throws for 3500 yards, 30 TDs, keeps his consecutive streak alive and makes the Pro Bowl.

The Packers for 16-0 and win the Super Bowl and the Vikings go 0-16.
Nonstopdrivel  
#75 Posted : Friday, August 21, 2009 2:01:46 PM(UTC)
Ugh, I don't want Brett Favre to present the NFC in the Pro Bowl. :P

Besides, when was the last time he actually played in a Pro Bowl to which he was invited? Seriously. Give the roster spot to someone who actually appreciates the honor.
walleye  
#76 Posted : Friday, August 21, 2009 4:53:53 PM(UTC)
has nothing to do with Brett. boobies , hotters and more boobies!!!!!!!
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages«<23
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Smokey (18h) : Friday is Seafood day , not Pizza night . Eat a Shrimp !
Cheesey (23-Jun) : Happy B-day rocker!
Zero2Cool (22-Jun) : Today's Birthdays: hardrocker950 (33)
Smokey (22-Jun) : Coffee anyone ?
Smokey (21-Jun) : good show
Cheesey (21-Jun) : APPLE with ice cream!
Smokey (20-Jun) : Cherry with Vanilla Ice Cream !!
Cheesey (20-Jun) : APPLE!
Smokey (20-Jun) : Apple or Cherry Pie ?
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : The only have 2 preseason games. I like that as the fans get to see more of the starters.
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : Next week I believe the CFL season starts. Go Redblacks!!!
Smokey (18-Jun) : Been researching CFL , Edmonton Eskimos have the best colors/uniforms .
Smokey (18-Jun) : When does the CFL Season start anyway ?
Smokey (18-Jun) : Saw Flute CFL highlights in the day, full CFL game was /is rare .
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : I wish many of you would have seen Doug Flutie in the CFL. Absolute beauty.
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : Vince Young cut from Sask. Roughriders. Good for him to consider the CFL, but only a select few NFL QB castoffs are a good CFL fit.
Smokey (17-Jun) : R 2
Zero2Cool (17-Jun) : Not all hackers are bad
Smokey (16-Jun) : Public Hangings for Hackers .
Cheesey (16-Jun) : No, he said HACKERS!
Smokey (16-Jun) : Did you say Crackers ?
Zero2Cool (16-Jun) : PACKERS PACKERS PACKERS
Cheesey (16-Jun) : "That is true, my dear Smokey!"LOL!
Smokey (15-Jun) : dat ? Brer Cheesey ?
Cheesey (15-Jun) : True dat, Smokey. MUCH better!
Smokey (15-Jun) : I like the fillets/tenders, they usually are a better deal.
Cheesey (15-Jun) : Good one, Porforis! Made me laugh!
Porforis (15-Jun) : Shoulda gone with Kentucky Fried Chickadee
Cheesey (15-Jun) : Last time I had KFC, the pieces were so small it should be renamed "Kentucky Fried Sparrow"
Cheesey (15-Jun) : POPEYES! (Or Churches chicken)
Smokey (15-Jun) : KFC or Popeyes Chicken ?
Smokey (15-Jun) : It's grocery shopping day !
Smokey (15-Jun) : Why did they shelter ?
buckeyepackfan (14-Jun) : Everybody safe in Green Bay? NFL Network babe said they had to take shelter in a theater for awhile.
Zero2Cool (14-Jun) : Today??
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Saturday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

29m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

15h / Around The NFL / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / Around The NFL / Smokey

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

22-Jun / Around The NFL / Smokey

22-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

21-Jun / Around The NFL / Smokey

21-Jun / Football Familiarity / Smokey

Headlines