Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
31 Pages«<1920212223>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline djcubez  
#201 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:28:04 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Madison
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 17
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?


That's TE. Once a TE gets injured, you might be screwed in any league. It's luck of the draw. But who says you can't trade for a TE with a team in contention? I believe, really, every team still is. Or atleast 18/20.

Oh and, there have been a lot of QBs who took over starting that were originally a FA.


Maybe if you also made a rule that you can't have 4 QB's on your roster I might not be having this problem...

Also I wouldn't be screwed in any other league. The fact is that there are 20 teams in this league and when I had a bye week for my defense there wasn't even one I could pick up. If I were in a regular 12 team league and I needed a defense, even if every team had two I could still pick up something. Same goes for TE, if I were in a regular league there'd be someone I could pick that at least had a chance to get me 3 or more points a week instead of one that only has 3 points on the whole season.

Plus it's not like I can go trading for a TE because half of the teams only have one TE on their whole team.
Offline The_Green_Ninja  
#202 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:38:30 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Tennessee
Applause Given: 70
Applause Received: 79
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?


That's TE. Once a TE gets injured, you might be screwed in any league. It's luck of the draw. But who says you can't trade for a TE with a team in contention? I believe, really, every team still is. Or atleast 18/20.

Oh and, there have been a lot of QBs who took over starting that were originally a FA.


Maybe if you also made a rule that you can't have 4 QB's on your roster I might not be having this problem...

Also I wouldn't be screwed in any other league. The fact is that there are 20 teams in this league and when I had a bye week for my defense there wasn't even one I could pick up. If I were in a regular 12 team league and I needed a defense, even if every team had two I could still pick up something. Same goes for TE, if I were in a regular league there'd be someone I could pick that at least had a chance to get me 3 or more points a week instead of one that only has 3 points on the whole season.

Plus it's not like I can go trading for a TE because half of the teams only have one TE on their whole team.


BTW, for one I'm a QB whore :thumbright: (But only one starts). Second, I then guess someone should have had a back-up plan at TE... :thumbleft:
Offline djcubez  
#203 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:50:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Madison
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 17
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?


That's TE. Once a TE gets injured, you might be screwed in any league. It's luck of the draw. But who says you can't trade for a TE with a team in contention? I believe, really, every team still is. Or atleast 18/20.

Oh and, there have been a lot of QBs who took over starting that were originally a FA.


Maybe if you also made a rule that you can't have 4 QB's on your roster I might not be having this problem...

Also I wouldn't be screwed in any other league. The fact is that there are 20 teams in this league and when I had a bye week for my defense there wasn't even one I could pick up. If I were in a regular 12 team league and I needed a defense, even if every team had two I could still pick up something. Same goes for TE, if I were in a regular league there'd be someone I could pick that at least had a chance to get me 3 or more points a week instead of one that only has 3 points on the whole season.

Plus it's not like I can go trading for a TE because half of the teams only have one TE on their whole team.


BTW, for one I'm a QB whore :thumbright: (But only one starts). Second, I then guess someone should have had a back-up plan at TE... :thumbleft:

It's hard to have a back-up plan when only 12 out of 20 teams can actually have a back-up plan...?
Offline The_Green_Ninja  
#204 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:55:02 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 11/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Tennessee
Applause Given: 70
Applause Received: 79
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?


That's TE. Once a TE gets injured, you might be screwed in any league. It's luck of the draw. But who says you can't trade for a TE with a team in contention? I believe, really, every team still is. Or atleast 18/20.

Oh and, there have been a lot of QBs who took over starting that were originally a FA.


Maybe if you also made a rule that you can't have 4 QB's on your roster I might not be having this problem...

Also I wouldn't be screwed in any other league. The fact is that there are 20 teams in this league and when I had a bye week for my defense there wasn't even one I could pick up. If I were in a regular 12 team league and I needed a defense, even if every team had two I could still pick up something. Same goes for TE, if I were in a regular league there'd be someone I could pick that at least had a chance to get me 3 or more points a week instead of one that only has 3 points on the whole season.

Plus it's not like I can go trading for a TE because half of the teams only have one TE on their whole team.


BTW, for one I'm a QB whore :thumbright: (But only one starts). Second, I then guess someone should have had a back-up plan at TE... :thumbleft:

It's hard to have a back-up plan when only 12 out of 20 teams can actually have a back-up plan...?


Thus the fun challenge! What positions are YOUR priorities?
Offline djcubez  
#205 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:22:17 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Madison
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 17
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?


That's TE. Once a TE gets injured, you might be screwed in any league. It's luck of the draw. But who says you can't trade for a TE with a team in contention? I believe, really, every team still is. Or atleast 18/20.

Oh and, there have been a lot of QBs who took over starting that were originally a FA.


Maybe if you also made a rule that you can't have 4 QB's on your roster I might not be having this problem...

Also I wouldn't be screwed in any other league. The fact is that there are 20 teams in this league and when I had a bye week for my defense there wasn't even one I could pick up. If I were in a regular 12 team league and I needed a defense, even if every team had two I could still pick up something. Same goes for TE, if I were in a regular league there'd be someone I could pick that at least had a chance to get me 3 or more points a week instead of one that only has 3 points on the whole season.

Plus it's not like I can go trading for a TE because half of the teams only have one TE on their whole team.


BTW, for one I'm a QB whore :thumbright: (But only one starts). Second, I then guess someone should have had a back-up plan at TE... :thumbleft:

It's hard to have a back-up plan when only 12 out of 20 teams can actually have a back-up plan...?


Thus the fun challenge! What positions are YOUR priorities?


I understand I'm complaining and yes it's all a part of playing in a 20 game league. I'm just trying to point out that I've been handcuffed from the start because of the 20 player format. dhazer said it perfectly when he pointed out that his team was set after the draft. I haven't used one FA pickup yet (unless you count Dreesen and White who have combined for a stellar 1 point the whole season).
Offline Zero2Cool  
#206 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:18:45 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,488
Applause Received: 4,008
The rule makes sense, changing it in Week 9, absurd.


Another reason I don't like PH tagged with something led by ... well ... you know ... one of them ... Yankees fans. :P
Offline IronMan  
#207 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:45:49 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

ESPN NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2010

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 161
Applause Received: 138
I've won 2 in a row. Look out!
Offline dhazer  
#208 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:49:43 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2016Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 100
Applause Received: 337
I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#209 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:59:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,488
Applause Received: 4,008
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.


Yea an using PackersHome gives PH a bad name!!! I blame it all on the Yankees fans! :P

16 teams
6 rounds of draft
free for all!!!
Offline Formo  
#210 Posted : Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:08:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 159
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.


I haven't hear someone whine so much in the position you are in, ever!

Shut up dude, you are beating the shit out of everything. You lose your right to complain.

And Zero.. You missed the train on this one.. That's on you, dawg. Now wipe away your tears and move along, little doegy..
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
31 Pages«<1920212223>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (2h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (2h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (3h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (7h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (7h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (7h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (7h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (7h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (7h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (7h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (7h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (8h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (8h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (8h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (8h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (8h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
uffda udfa (8h) : Complaining of PI call and huddle penalty.
uffda udfa (8h) : Dallas play by play guy said we aren't best team.
uffda udfa (8h) : NBC is off the air down here. This is an OTA broadcast signal.
uffda udfa (8h) : Tornado warnings in Dallas area. Sign of aPACKalypse to Cowboys fans.
uffda udfa (8h) : I agree with a Homer. That's true. It was actually 35 per Erin Andrews post game int.
Zero2Cool (8h) : @espnhomer 4th and 26 is dead replaced by 36 on 3rd and 20.
uffda udfa (9h) : Garrett said he'd never seen or heard of the 15 yard penalty huddle rule.
uffda udfa (9h) : *toe
uffda udfa (9h) : Called Cook's catch best The tie drag in NFL history.
uffda udfa (9h) : Cowboys a much better team but Packers have best player. 105.3 The Fan.
uffda udfa (9h) : Dallas sports radio is some great comedy. Hysterical.
uffda udfa (9h) : Funnest Packers game since SB win ironically in same stadium.
DarkaneRules (9h) : you're amongst friends/family then
uffda udfa (9h) : I hate Dallas and love Green bay.
coltonja (9h) : In the most non-weird way possible I wish we could get a feed of the locker room- only for these first few minutes of celebration after the
yinzer (9h) : Pittsburgh!!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Packers Headlines