Green Bay Packers Forum
7 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline beast  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 12:11:28 AM(UTC)
Favre totally went for FS Eugene Wilson knee in the pre-season game against the Texans on a cut block....

I honestly don't care who that is.... it could be Aaron Rodgers or Woodson ... or honestly I don't care...... if someone takes a shot at someone knee like that I want to see pay back...

I don't care if I'm on there team on not that was totally dirty and I wanted the other team to make a point that will not be allowed..... they should of taken a shot at Favre legal or not.....
Sponsor
Offline Greg C.  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 12:20:16 AM(UTC)
It's called a "cheap shot," not a "cheat shot."

In all my years of watching football, I've never seen a QB make a dirty play until tonight. Favre is lucky the Texans didn't try to take him out of the game after that. And he's lucky the Vikings don't play the Texans again this season.
Offline sfalim  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 12:38:55 AM(UTC)
I didn't watch the Vikings-Texans game so I don't know what happened, but from what I've read, Favre made a cheap shot at one of the Texans players?

That's comes as a bit of a surprise for me, because no matter how disappointed and saddened I am of the way Favre has carried himself since his departure from Green Bay, I would like to think there's still a semblence of "the guy we all fell in love with and rooted for" left in him. There's still a very small part of me that wants to believe that everything he's done is because of the right reason, that he just loves the game that much. So it's just a tragedy to see him carry himself like that nowadays, slowly but surely tarnishing everything that endeared people to him.
Offline TheEngineer  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 12:45:21 AM(UTC)
Yes it was cheap, but not exactly on purpose.

It was a crackback block while lined up out wide on a wildcat play on Eugene Wilson.
Offline Formo  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 12:51:12 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Yes it was cheap, but not exactly on purpose.

It was a crackback block while lined up out wide on a wildcat play on Eugene Wilson.


The way he tried to block was on purpose.. As far as trying to hurt the guy.. I doubt it was purposeful (BTW, the player 'hurt' got off the field on his own power).

I've see Favre throw low blocks like that a few times in the past. And every time, I hated it. First off, it is a 'cheap' block (going at someone's knees like that). Second off, he's always done plays like that as a Packer. Thus, I hated it.

The big issue here is.. How many green goggles will protest that play and demand Favre's head?
Offline Cheesey  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 1:33:12 AM(UTC)
Favre ALWAYS blocked like that.
I really don't think he does it on purpose, i think it's cause he was never trained how to properly block.
Offline Formo  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 1:39:56 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Favre ALWAYS blocked like that.
I really don't think he does it on purpose, i think it's cause he was never trained how to properly block.


Yup.

The only difference is with tonights block, the safety wasn't looking forward Favre's direction.. he was looking off to his left.

He's a QB. No way does he block for a living. No way does he know the rules of the crack-back block.

What's really funny is seeing people go up in arms about this, demanding Favre's head. Like they have any sort of experience playing NFL football..
Offline tromadz  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 2:35:06 AM(UTC)
I thought he broke that guy's legs at first glance.

All he did was throw his body at the guy. It happens. He's a blocking noob.
Offline WhatHappensNow  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 3:07:05 AM(UTC)
Didn't surprise me.
Offline xavierlee9  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 3:20:48 AM(UTC)
Blame Childress. That stuff was straight up childish. Third quarter of a preseason game, and you have a 40 year old who you just put the entire franchise on for this year out there throwing blocks. WTF.
Offline Rockmolder  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 6:43:48 AM(UTC)
2:27 - 3:08

Anyway, it was a cheap block. Obviously it was, since he got penalized for it. Maybe he shouldn't have done it, but like said before, that's the way he blocked here as well. I'm just going to asume that he's trying to do a cut block or something, but it never works out.
Offline Greg C.  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 7:52:24 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What's really funny is seeing people go up in arms about this, demanding Favre's head. Like they have any sort of experience playing NFL football..


I'm not sure what you mean by "demanding Favre's head." I just said it was a cheap shot, which it obviously was. It was probably more a result of incompetence than bad intent (maybe it's not such a good idea for a guy to hop off his lawn mower and join an NFL team), but it was still cheap, and he could've ended that guy's season. Blocking low is one thing--that's what QB's do on those plays--but blocking low from the side when the guy's not looking is another thing.

At least the announcers recognized it for what it was, instead of the usual, "He's just having fun out there."
Offline Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 8:26:51 AM(UTC)
We've seen him do it a dozen times in our uniform when he was a good QB. No reason to suddenly switch ethics because he's washed up wearing purple and jump his booty for trying to be a team player. Cheap shot, yes, move on.
Offline LambeauEast  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 8:28:49 AM(UTC)
Speaking of announcers...I was watching Total Access on NFL Network, and Marshall Faulk was praising Percy Harvin as the second coming of Christ. And he then proceeded to mention how these Queen receivers can get yards after the catch, which is something he never had in Green Bay! HUH?! WTF?! I know Faulk is a tool and all, but are you freakin' kidding me?!?!?!
Offline Rockmolder  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, September 1, 2009 8:40:56 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Speaking of announcers...I was watching Total Access on NFL Network, and Marshall Faulk was praising Percy Harvin as the second coming of Christ. And he then proceeded to mention how these Queen receivers can get yards after the catch, which is something he never had in Green Bay! HUH?! WTF?! I know Faulk is a tool and all, but are you freakin' kidding me?!?!?!


He said it a bit unclear, but I think he meant that he did have them in GB, but not in NY.

'Where Favre will fall in love with him at, in GB, something he didn't have with the Jets, run after the catch...'

At least, that's what I make from that sentence.

2:25
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter