Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline LambeauEast  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:17:48 AM(UTC)
LambeauEast

Rank: Registered
Joined: 10/19/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 20
http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_13249891

Quote:
Charley Walters: Do the Green Bay Packers have Favre envy?
Pioneer Press
Updated: 09/01/2009 11:58:02 PM CDT

If Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy were watching Brett Favre quarterback the Vikings in Houston on TV Monday night, and it's expected they were, the Green Bay Packers' general manager and coach had to have glanced uneasily at each other and murmured, 'Uh-oh.'

It was merely an exhibition game, but it put Favre on display, and he showed he still has plenty of what it takes to win, especially with the Vikings.

Thompson and McCarthy two years ago figured it was time to move on without Favre, who turns 40 next month. But they were uncertain whether they were right that's why they included the poison pill prohibiting Favre from playing for the Vikings when they traded him to the New York Jets.

Now, Thompson and McCarthy have to be nervous. And some Packers rooters have to be wondering, too, about the decision to ingloriously dump their beloved future hall of famer.

Favre insists there was no Packers revenge motive in signing with rival Minnesota. But his display against the Texans strong, on-target passes and poised field leadership forecast that the Oct. 5 "real game" between the Vikings and Packers at the Metrodome should be one of the classics in sports history.

And in what should be even better, there will be the "Classic II" game between the Vikings and Packers three weeks later in Green Bay.


I hope I didn't put this in the wrong place, or it's been done already. I just found it humorous. Some how I don't think Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy are saying "uh oh".
Sponsor
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:38:07 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 556
Don't think there was Uh-oh on their minds either based on Favre. Vikes defense is looking pretty stout against the run again, passing still has some holes. Peterson opening run was a big Uh-oh as well.

Other than that, and the 2 min drill drive, there was really not much to uh-oh over from the Vikes offensively.
Offline MassPackersFan  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:45:41 AM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
I was just about to post this.

This is the equivalent of Saddam Hussein puffing his chest out and thinking that America was shaking in its boots when he acquired some old, reworked scud missiles.
Offline DakotaT  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:53:24 AM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 753
Applause Received: 1,522
I don't think the game plan changes when playing the Vikings: try to shut down Peterson/Chester. Passing downs - blitz.
Offline Bigbyfan  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:06:23 AM(UTC)
Bigbyfan

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 42
Applause Received: 92
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.
Offline Cheesey  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:29:04 AM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 538
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!
Offline IronMan  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:34:46 AM(UTC)
IronMan

ESPN NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2010

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 117
Message to Charley Walters:

Get over it. No matter what happens, no one is proving anyone wrong or right. It was the right decision to go with Rodgers when we did.
Offline TwinkieGorilla  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:39:19 AM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 42
bahahaha! yeah right. *rolls eyes*


Way Rodgers Looked > Way Favre Looked


undoubtedly.
Offline MassPackersFan  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:47:17 AM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
Dude, it's not even close. Favre completed maybe 1 downfield pass with zip on it. Everything else was dump offs or incompletions.
Offline longtimefan  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:50:32 AM(UTC)
longtimefan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/30/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 21
this will be posted on Bretts site and they will bow to this reporters feet as the 2nd coming( 1st would be Brett)
Offline ILikeThePackers39  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 12:58:31 PM(UTC)
ILikeThePackers39

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
<snort>

Yeah, the Packers are worried.

I think it's pretty clear that the only people who still care about this at all are (in order of how much it matters to them): Favre, Packers fans, and Vikings fans. I'm guessing the team and FO are a little busy with other tasks at this point, and I would imagine that they really don't care.
Offline dhazer  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 1:28:46 PM(UTC)
dhazer

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 65
Applause Received: 238
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!


Last time i checked he got dumped, he did come back to the Packers and they traded him and those are the facts look it up Razz
Offline TwinkieGorilla  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 1:50:55 PM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 42
yeah, and thank fuck we dumped him when we did.
Offline LambeauEast  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 2:01:06 PM(UTC)
LambeauEast

Rank: Registered
Joined: 10/19/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 20
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!


Last time i checked he got dumped, he did come back to the Packers and they traded him and those are the facts look it up Razz


Yup, he got dumped like a prom night dumpster baby.
Offline Rockmolder  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 2:02:24 PM(UTC)
Rockmolder

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Rank: Veteran Member
Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 190
Applause Received: 310
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!


Last time i checked he got dumped, he did come back to the Packers and they traded him and those are the facts look it up Razz


Yup, he got dumped like a prom night dumpster baby.


[youtube]kRj-S8Aklcw[/youtube]
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
57m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind


Tweeter