Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline LambeauEast  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:17:48 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 10/19/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 20
http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_13249891

Quote:
Charley Walters: Do the Green Bay Packers have Favre envy?
Pioneer Press
Updated: 09/01/2009 11:58:02 PM CDT

If Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy were watching Brett Favre quarterback the Vikings in Houston on TV Monday night, and it's expected they were, the Green Bay Packers' general manager and coach had to have glanced uneasily at each other and murmured, 'Uh-oh.'

It was merely an exhibition game, but it put Favre on display, and he showed he still has plenty of what it takes to win, especially with the Vikings.

Thompson and McCarthy two years ago figured it was time to move on without Favre, who turns 40 next month. But they were uncertain whether they were right that's why they included the poison pill prohibiting Favre from playing for the Vikings when they traded him to the New York Jets.

Now, Thompson and McCarthy have to be nervous. And some Packers rooters have to be wondering, too, about the decision to ingloriously dump their beloved future hall of famer.

Favre insists there was no Packers revenge motive in signing with rival Minnesota. But his display against the Texans strong, on-target passes and poised field leadership forecast that the Oct. 5 "real game" between the Vikings and Packers at the Metrodome should be one of the classics in sports history.

And in what should be even better, there will be the "Classic II" game between the Vikings and Packers three weeks later in Green Bay.


I hope I didn't put this in the wrong place, or it's been done already. I just found it humorous. Some how I don't think Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy are saying "uh oh".
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:38:07 AM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 583
Don't think there was Uh-oh on their minds either based on Favre. Vikes defense is looking pretty stout against the run again, passing still has some holes. Peterson opening run was a big Uh-oh as well.

Other than that, and the 2 min drill drive, there was really not much to uh-oh over from the Vikes offensively.
Offline MassPackersFan  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:45:41 AM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
I was just about to post this.

This is the equivalent of Saddam Hussein puffing his chest out and thinking that America was shaking in its boots when he acquired some old, reworked scud missiles.
Offline DakotaT  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:53:24 AM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 783
Applause Received: 1,577
I don't think the game plan changes when playing the Vikings: try to shut down Peterson/Chester. Passing downs - blitz.
Offline Bigbyfan  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:06:23 AM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 59
Applause Received: 157
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.
Offline Cheesey  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:29:04 AM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 434
Applause Received: 609
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!
Offline IronMan  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:34:46 AM(UTC)

ESPN NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2010

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 117
Message to Charley Walters:

Get over it. No matter what happens, no one is proving anyone wrong or right. It was the right decision to go with Rodgers when we did.
Offline TwinkieGorilla  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:39:19 AM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 43
bahahaha! yeah right. *rolls eyes*


Way Rodgers Looked > Way Favre Looked


undoubtedly.
Offline MassPackersFan  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:47:17 AM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
Dude, it's not even close. Favre completed maybe 1 downfield pass with zip on it. Everything else was dump offs or incompletions.
Offline longtimefan  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 11:50:32 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/30/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 21
this will be posted on Bretts site and they will bow to this reporters feet as the 2nd coming( 1st would be Brett)
Offline ILikeThePackers39  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 12:58:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
<snort>

Yeah, the Packers are worried.

I think it's pretty clear that the only people who still care about this at all are (in order of how much it matters to them): Favre, Packers fans, and Vikings fans. I'm guessing the team and FO are a little busy with other tasks at this point, and I would imagine that they really don't care.
Offline dhazer  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 1:28:46 PM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 72
Applause Received: 270
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!


Last time i checked he got dumped, he did come back to the Packers and they traded him and those are the facts look it up :P
Offline TwinkieGorilla  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 1:50:55 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 43
yeah, and thank fuck we dumped him when we did.
Offline LambeauEast  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 2:01:06 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 10/19/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 20
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!


Last time i checked he got dumped, he did come back to the Packers and they traded him and those are the facts look it up :P


Yup, he got dumped like a prom night dumpster baby.
Offline Rockmolder  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, September 2, 2009 2:02:24 PM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Rank: Veteran Member
Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 198
Applause Received: 323
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe the author should have mentioned that Childress was probably saying 'uh oh" when Aaron Rodgers was moving the ball down the field with ease on almost every drive of every game so far. Or maybe how Childress was saying "uh oh" when he saw our defense forcing multiple turnovers every game, giving the Packers a +10 turnover margin through the first 3 games.

Good point!
I STILL laugh when i read how the Packers supposedly "dumped" Favre. He retired, unretired, the Packers were gonna let him come back as the starter, he quit again.
How is that "dumping" him?
I wish these so called "reporters" would get that straight. At least SOMETHING factual!


Last time i checked he got dumped, he did come back to the Packers and they traded him and those are the facts look it up :P


Yup, he got dumped like a prom night dumpster baby.


[youtube]kRj-S8Aklcw[/youtube]
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (now) : Michael Rodney: OLB Adrian Hubbard has been released.
Zero2Cool (18m) : Whoa, Jared Abbrederris might practice today!!
Zero2Cool (1h) : Panthers cutting WR Jarrett Boykin
Smokey (17h) : Matt Blanchard = Trade Bait
Zero2Cool (31-Aug) : Matt Blanchard?
Zero2Cool (30-Aug) : Doubt any QB is cut before Thursday. I want to see more of Matt and Brett.
Smokey (30-Aug) : Why be a guest, come join us today !
Zero2Cool (30-Aug) : Hyde is the injury I'm most concerned about. Cobby fine.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / RainX

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / CaliforniaCheez

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

31-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / FLORIDA PACKER88

31-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter