Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
10 Pages123>»

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Cheesey  
#1 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:30:36 PM(UTC)
Ravens kicker misses on the last play. Queens got lucky.
UffDaVikes  
#2 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 5:50:21 PM(UTC)
That was lucky.

Apparently Brett still has that lucky horseshoe in his ass. The packers should have made him leave it for Aaron Rodgers when he cleaned out his locker.

I have to admit, I am not used to endings like we are having this year.
Rockmolder  
#3 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:03:30 PM(UTC)
Freakin' kickers. That really should've been Minnesota's first loss of the season.

Still, pretty well played. Glad that they got so close to a loss, though. Ought to help get those egos down a tad bit.
PackFanWithTwins  
#4 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:03:56 PM(UTC)
Not sure I would consider that win lucky. They were in the lead after all. What I will say, is MN is playing with fire week in and week out. Allowing teams to stay close. They have have gotten away with it, but that will not always happen.
Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:14:01 PM(UTC)
They're 6 - 0. Luck has nothing to do with it. They are the better team. The better team won.
zombieslayer  
#6 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:26:58 PM(UTC)
A 44-yard FG is NOT a gimme. Had the FG been for 29 yards, then yes, it can be considered lucky.

Still would be funny to post a FAIL video on youtube for their kicker. But due to copyright violations, it would only stay up there for a few hours.
dfosterf  
#7 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:32:59 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They're 6 - 0. Luck has nothing to do with it. They are the better team. The better team won.


I think they got lucky. We are playing for the wild-card now, as that is precisely the kind of good luck that propels a team to greatness, imo.

That was quite possibly the biggest deal to OUR future this season.

In other words, it SUCKED.

The Vikes will ROLL off of that type of win, as if they were not rolling already.

I would like to remind everyone that I hate the Vikings. This is what happens to me (on a personal level, on a continuous basis) when I try and root for bad things for my hated rival and good things for my situationally loved other rival.

I call it FAIL. My team failed me so badly at the metrodome. Those fucks now think they are the shit. We started it.

FAIL

FAIL

FAIL

I want jobs, careers, etc.

FAIL

FAIL

FAIL

I have an opinionated stance, lol
djcubez  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:44:15 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They're 6 - 0. Luck has nothing to do with it. They are the better team. The better team won.

Did you watch the game? The Ravens absolutely had their way on offense with the Vikes on all of their last possessions. They scored in 1:13 to get it to 27-17. Minnesota gets a FG after the Ravens have an awesome defensive stand in the red zone to make it 30-17. The Ravens score a few minutes later after a big play by Ray Rice to make it 30-24. The Vikes get the ball and get dominated by Ray Lewis and the D for a three and out and the Vikings have to punt from their end zone. Ravens get the ball at the Vikings 35 yard-line and on the first play Ray Rice runs into the end zone making it 31-30 Ravens. The Vikings get the ball and are looking like they might get stopped when Favre heaves a ball into one-on-one coverage against Frank Walker who gets beat and the Vikings are already in the FG range. They run the clock and then get the FG to take the lead 34-31. Flacco gets the ball at the 20 with no timeouts and 1:58 left. He makes phenomenal throws to lead his team to a 44-yard FG with 3 seconds on the clock. Than the kicker misses. Now the Vikings clearly were getting beat in the final quarter of the game but two big, considerably lucky plays (63 yard Favre all or nothing bomb and a missed FG) aided them in winning the game. I think they deserved to get beat and I don't think the better team prevailed in this game.
IronMan  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:54:23 PM(UTC)
6-0 and they are lucky? I understand they are the enemy, but saying stuff like "they are lucky" and "the better team didn't win" is just silly.
RedSoxExcel  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01:11 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They're 6 - 0. Luck has nothing to do with it. They are the better team. The better team won.

Did you watch the game? The Ravens absolutely had their way on offense with the Vikes on all of their last possessions. They scored in 1:13 to get it to 27-17. Minnesota gets a FG after the Ravens have an awesome defensive stand in the red zone to make it 30-17. The Ravens score a few minutes later after a big play by Ray Rice to make it 30-24. The Vikes get the ball and get dominated by Ray Lewis and the D for a three and out and the Vikings have to punt from their end zone. Ravens get the ball at the Vikings 35 yard-line and on the first play Ray Rice runs into the end zone making it 31-30 Ravens. The Vikings get the ball and are looking like they might get stopped when Favre heaves a ball into one-on-one coverage against Frank Walker who gets beat and the Vikings are already in the FG range. They run the clock and then get the FG to take the lead 34-31. Flacco gets the ball at the 20 with no timeouts and 1:58 left. He makes phenomenal throws to lead his team to a 44-yard FG with 3 seconds on the clock. Than the kicker misses. Now the Vikings clearly were getting beat in the final quarter of the game but two big, considerably lucky plays (63 yard Favre all or nothing bomb and a missed FG) aided them in winning the game. I think they deserved to get beat and I don't think the better team prevailed in this game.


Man you are such a hater, lol. "considerably lucky plays (63 yard Favre all or nothing bomb). LOL. You call running around, avoiding the defenders, then throwing it 50 yards down the field in the hands of the receiver who has one on one coverage (and was pass intereference) "considerably lucky". I don't get it. Can you please explain that? Is that mean every time a QB throws into the hands of a WR in one on one coverage a "considerably lucky play". Your whole thing was that Favre could not do it against a good team and he did, stop the Haterade.

But man that game p's me off. Such garbage. I cannot believe that he missed that FG. Would Stover have missed it? Can't blame him too much because it was a long one but I don't know but UGH. 5-1 and we're 3-2 and we're playing the Browns and their playing the Steelers on the road. Then it could be 5-2, 4-3 with them coming into our house. UGH. I wouldn't call it luck because I think they were the better team but it hurts. It would have deflated them to no end to lose that game.

On a positive note I think Chili eventually makes them lose. He played Marty Ball. 63 yarder Rice reception, 3 straight conservative plays, FG. 60 yard run by Peterson, 3 straight conservative plays, FG. 60 yard Rice reception, 3 straight conservative plays, FG.
djcubez  
#11 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:08:45 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They're 6 - 0. Luck has nothing to do with it. They are the better team. The better team won.

Did you watch the game? The Ravens absolutely had their way on offense with the Vikes on all of their last possessions. They scored in 1:13 to get it to 27-17. Minnesota gets a FG after the Ravens have an awesome defensive stand in the red zone to make it 30-17. The Ravens score a few minutes later after a big play by Ray Rice to make it 30-24. The Vikes get the ball and get dominated by Ray Lewis and the D for a three and out and the Vikings have to punt from their end zone. Ravens get the ball at the Vikings 35 yard-line and on the first play Ray Rice runs into the end zone making it 31-30 Ravens. The Vikings get the ball and are looking like they might get stopped when Favre heaves a ball into one-on-one coverage against Frank Walker who gets beat and the Vikings are already in the FG range. They run the clock and then get the FG to take the lead 34-31. Flacco gets the ball at the 20 with no timeouts and 1:58 left. He makes phenomenal throws to lead his team to a 44-yard FG with 3 seconds on the clock. Than the kicker misses. Now the Vikings clearly were getting beat in the final quarter of the game but two big, considerably lucky plays (63 yard Favre all or nothing bomb and a missed FG) aided them in winning the game. I think they deserved to get beat and I don't think the better team prevailed in this game.


Man you are such a hater, lol. "considerably lucky plays (63 yard Favre all or nothing bomb). LOL. You call running around, avoiding the defenders, then throwing it 50 yards down the field in the hands of the receiver who has one on one coverage (and was pass intereference) "considerably lucky". I don't get it. Can you please explain that? Is that mean every time a QB throws into the hands of a WR in one on one coverage a "considerably lucky play". Your whole thing was that Favre could not do it against a good team and he did, stop the Haterade.

But man that game p's me off. Such garbage. I cannot believe that he missed that FG. Would Stover have missed it? Can't blame him too much because it was a long one but I don't know but UGH. 5-1 and we're 3-2 and we're playing the Browns and their playing the Steelers on the road. Then it could be 5-2, 4-3 with them coming into our house. UGH. I wouldn't call it luck because I think they were the better team but it hurts. It would have deflated them to no end to lose that game.

On a positive note I think Chili eventually makes them lose. He played Marty Ball. 63 yarder Rice reception, 3 straight conservative plays, FG. 60 yard run by Peterson, 3 straight conservative plays, FG. 60 yard Rice reception, 3 straight conservative plays, FG.


I've said the Vikings are a good team but I think they're just creating really high expectations for themselves. I think they're possibly setting themselves up for a disastrous end of the season. I don't think the Vikings are a bad team, they've proven they're good just by going 6-0. However, the two games they won against legitimate opponents have required last second reversals in fortune. Literally the game ended on the last play and both times it went in their favor, against the 49ers the Favre threw 35 yard pass with 8 seconds left into double coverage that the receiver caught and barely stayed in bounds on. Against the Ravens they had to count on a kicker missing a 44 yard field goal in a dome. If both those plays go the other way the Vikings are 4-2. A good team? Yes, sure I've never said they were bad. I just don't believe in the hype surrounding them and I think they're ultimately setting themselves up for heartbreak at the end of the season. They have proven they can beat good teams, but a playoff matchup against the Saints, Falcons or Giants? They literally haven't played a team with a dominating offense yet.

Also about the 63 yard heave. Yes I believe any time a ball gets thrown deep into single coverage it's a bit lucky when the receiver comes down with it. It's not like that's a high percentage play...
RedSoxExcel  
#12 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:26:47 PM(UTC)
Hey Dj, the other thing that closed because I guess we cannot discuss Favre in the Favre forum.

I agree with you that the chances of Favre fading are there. He's 40 years old and age is what it is. But all I was saying was that to this point, he's done what was expected of him and I wish badly that it was Jackson in there instead of him because he is giving them confidence and putting up very good numbers. But for our sakes, hopefully he fades and shows his age sooner or later.

Overall, the Vikings are good but they are very beatable. Flacco put up 384 yards on them today. Ray Rice ran all over htem in the 2nd half. And Winfield may be injured. Just that game hurts because 5-1 and us being 3-2, sounds so much better than 6-0 and us being 3-2. I think the better team won but still it hurts.

I think the Saints v. Vikings at a neutral field, the Saints win, the Vikings are not the best in the NFL, let alone the NFC.
djcubez  
#13 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:37:18 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey Dj, the other thing that closed because I guess we cannot discuss Favre in the Favre forum.

I agree with you that the chances of Favre fading are there. He's 40 years old and age is what it is. But all I was saying was that to this point, he's done what was expected of him and I wish badly that it was Jackson in there instead of him because he is giving them confidence and putting up very good numbers. But for our sakes, hopefully he fades and shows his age sooner or later.

Overall, the Vikings are good but they are very beatable. Flacco put up 384 yards on them today. Ray Rice ran all over htem in the 2nd half. And Winfield may be injured. Just that game hurts because 5-1 and us being 3-2, sounds so much better than 6-0 and us being 3-2. I think the better team won but still it hurts.

I think the Saints v. Vikings at a neutral field, the Saints win, the Vikings are not the best in the NFL, let alone the NFC.


I'm not trying to take away from what the Vikings have I just think they're vastly overrated. All of their big games (GB, SF and BAL) have been in the dome and their other games (CLE, DET, STL) have been on the road. The next two games for them @Steelers and @Packers will really show if this team has put it together or not. I'll say it again too, I'm not trying to take away from what they have accomplish, I'm just merely pointing out that there's still a good reason for concern if you're a fan of this team.
Cheesey  
#14 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:14:45 PM(UTC)
I STILL say it was lucky. A 44 yard FG INDOORS. No wind, a good snap and hold.
The Vikings got lucky.
That doesn't mean i think they suck. They look better then they have in MANY years. They just lucked out today is all i'm saying.
The Ravens kicker pulled a "Viking".

Thats ok though.......just gives the Queens farther to fall when they do! :thumbright:
Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:21:25 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They're 6 - 0. Luck has nothing to do with it. They are the better team. The better team won.

Did you watch the game? The Ravens absolutely had their way on offense with the Vikes on all of their last possessions. They scored in 1:13 to get it to 27-17. Minnesota gets a FG after the Ravens have an awesome defensive stand in the red zone to make it 30-17. The Ravens score a few minutes later after a big play by Ray Rice to make it 30-24. The Vikes get the ball and get dominated by Ray Lewis and the D for a three and out and the Vikings have to punt from their end zone. Ravens get the ball at the Vikings 35 yard-line and on the first play Ray Rice runs into the end zone making it 31-30 Ravens. The Vikings get the ball and are looking like they might get stopped when Favre heaves a ball into one-on-one coverage against Frank Walker who gets beat and the Vikings are already in the FG range. They run the clock and then get the FG to take the lead 34-31. Flacco gets the ball at the 20 with no timeouts and 1:58 left. He makes phenomenal throws to lead his team to a 44-yard FG with 3 seconds on the clock. Than the kicker misses. Now the Vikings clearly were getting beat in the final quarter of the game but two big, considerably lucky plays (63 yard Favre all or nothing bomb and a missed FG) aided them in winning the game. I think they deserved to get beat and I don't think the better team prevailed in this game.


There's four quarters to a game.
Gravedigga  
#16 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:23:32 PM(UTC)
UserPostedImage
longtimefan  
#17 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:33:56 PM(UTC)
LOL @ now Packer fans are being called Viking haters as its a bad thing

WOW
Zero2Cool  
#18 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:53:44 PM(UTC)
This random display of alleged Packers fans pulling for the Vikings is ... pathetic. Get off this site - you're a disgrace to the Packers and the true fans.

Edit, or just admit you're a Vikings fan. Stop playing both sides of the fence, you losers!
mi_keys  
#19 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 9:13:25 PM(UTC)
We spend all day bitching about our penalties and our offensive line and how our win was horrible and what not. Then when someone points out that the Vikings got away with one with Baltimore's kicker missing a 44 yard field goal in doors they get labeled haters. I guarantee each and everyone of us would be saying how lucky we were if that were the Packers in the Vikings place. The Vikings took a game in which they had a 17 point lead with 10 minutes to go and gift wrapped it for Baltimore to take, only for the Ravens to stamp it "return to sender." That is about as big of a meltdown as you can see in the final 10 minutes of a game and in spite of how good they played the other 50 minutes and how good they are, they were lucky to win today.
PackFanWithTwins  
#20 Posted : Sunday, October 18, 2009 9:22:37 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
This random display of alleged Packers fans pulling for the Vikings is ... pathetic. Get off this site - you're a disgrace to the Packers and the true fans.

Edit, or just admit you're a Vikings fan. Stop playing both sides of the fence, you losers!


They just like the fence posts up their butts.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
10 Pages123>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Fans wondered what he was smoking
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Funny talk about Watkins, LeRoy Butler suggested a trade for him a few years ago on FB
Zero2Cool (17-Jan) : Report: Landry wants Davante Adams-type deal -
Zero2Cool (17-Jan) : Packers bring in Sammy Watkins, you will ALL shite your pants
buckeyepackfan (17-Jan) : How long till we here the fire alarms go off in the middle of the night !!!
buckeyepackfan (17-Jan) : cheatin' bastards!!!! :)
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Patriots have no end to what they'll do for a win!
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : RB Leonard Fournette was involved in a minor accident today when his car was rear-ended.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers safeties coach Darren Perry interviewing with Texans
Zero2Cool (15-Jan) : Damarious Randall has hand surgery
Cheesey (15-Jan) : Man, talk about dumb luck. The Saints defense on that last play looked like the Packers D.
Zero2Cool (15-Jan) : "Skol Vikings!" It is the team's Viking war chant ... Inspired by Iceland's national soccer team
Zero2Cool (15-Jan) : Packers not playing sure makes playoff weekend less tense.
Nonstopdrivel (15-Jan) : I am slowly recovering from cardiac arrest. What an ending. What a freaking ending!
Mucky Tundra (15-Jan) : DONT BLOW THIS NEW ORLEANS
Smokey (14-Jan) : The"CHAT" is very open !
Zero2Cool (14-Jan) : Damn Saints giving them the game
Nonstopdrivel (14-Jan) : Mariota just ran up the white flag.
Zero2Cool (14-Jan) : Titans OL not too good without Conklin
KRK (13-Jan) : Schwartz defense looking very porous
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : Get yo asses in the chat room, mofrackers!
Smokey (13-Jan) : YES, CHAT
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : Anyone going to be in the chat room for the game?
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : As much as I'd love to experience playoff football, I'm not interested in paying that kind of money to go by myself.
Rockmolder (13-Jan) : Are you thinking about going?
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : Last I checked, there are still tickets available. And they're not too bad: $145 on up.
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : The temps around here are dropping fast and the wind is kicking up. I wonder if that will favor Philly.
Rockmolder (13-Jan) : You'd hope that something will happen before march and the FA window opening.
beast (12-Jan) : I believe the Packers did file a grievance to get the non-2017 signing bonus money back, but I haven't heard when the grievance will be heard
Rockmolder (11-Jan) : In terms of bonus money and that $4.2 million cap hit in 2018.
Rockmolder (11-Jan) : Has there been any news on Bennett? Can't find anything, but I'm not on Twitter.
Rockmolder (11-Jan) : Become a bandwagoner. Live the easy life of no frustrations and constant wins.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Jan) : Problem with that is . . . after the man retires, which team do you follow? Do you just give up football altogether?
Nonstopdrivel (11-Jan) : "My wife since divorced the Packers realizing she was truly a Brett Favre fan." --PackInSteel
Zero2Cool (11-Jan) : raw theme, raw forum, enhanced software! ohhh snap
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

18-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / TheKanataThrilla

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Nonstopdrivel

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

15-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

14-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines