Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Yeah, I guess Aaron should’ve played DLine or MLB in that game and stopped the run. That loss is almost 100% on the shitty defensive play.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Aaron Rodgers threw two INT's and fumbled three times (one lost), that's on the Packers defense? Let's stop with the bullshit. The Packers were not on the same level as the 49ers on any front last season, period.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Aaron Rodgers threw two INT's and fumbled three times (one lost), that's on the Packers defense? Let's stop with the bullshit. The Packers were not on the same level as the 49ers on any front last season, period.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



That’s a fact. But I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a defense get man handled so consistently, especially when they knew exactly what the offense was going to do.

My point is, they could’ve helped fix that issue last night. Instead, we drafted a player who probably won’t contribute for 4+ years. And Rodgers may still be playing at a high level by the time Love’s rookie contract expires. I think drafting the future QB this year was very premature. Especially to trade up for one in the first round. I hope I’m wrong. And I hope Love succeeds in the NFL, but my hopes aren’t too high.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

That’s a fact. But I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a defense get man handled so consistently, especially when they knew exactly what the offense was going to do.

My point is, they could’ve helped fix that issue last night. Instead, we drafted a player who probably won’t contribute for 4+ years. And Rodgers may still be playing at a high level by the time Love’s rookie contract expires. I think drafting the future QB this year was very premature. Especially to trade up for one in the first round. I hope I’m wrong. And I hope Love succeeds in the NFL, but my hopes aren’t too high.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Sorry, I think that's trash. If anyone thinks a rookie is going to come in and be the difference, they don't really understand nor appreciate the thorough ass whipping the Packers took from the 49ers ... twice. Outside of maybe Chase Young, there is not anyone in this draft (based on the "experts" analysis) that would have helped.

I was hoping the Packers take a WR in round two, and still hope for that. I was thinking the Packers would take a OL in round one.

I was hoping the Packers board showed the best available would be a LB and he'd be able to at least contribute SOME to the Packers 2020. By some, I'm saying even in a rotational role like Rashan Gary in 2019. A QB provides absolutely nothing in 2020. I don't expect rookies to be difference makers, but I do like to first round picks on the field even in a part-time role.

That all being said, I am trusting the Packers more than what I wanted because well, I freaking SUCK at drafting (e.g. my disgust in Packers taking WR Greg Jennings instead of WR Chad Jackson) and have since stopped getting bent out of shape over a pick.

I thought this was interesting about Jordan Love. Figured since this is a JORDAN LOVE topic, we should PROBABLY talk about the dude.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Sorry, I think that's trash. If anyone thinks a rookie is going to come in and be the difference, they don't really understand nor appreciate the thorough ass whipping the Packers took from the 49ers ... twice. Outside of maybe Chase Young, there is not anyone in this draft (based on the "experts" analysis) that would have helped.

I was hoping the Packers take a WR in round two, and still hope for that. I was thinking the Packers would take a OL in round one.

I was hoping the Packers board showed the best available would be a LB and he'd be able to at least contribute SOME to the Packers 2020. By some, I'm saying even in a rotational role like Rashan Gary in 2019. A QB provides absolutely nothing in 2020. I don't expect rookies to be difference makers, but I do like to first round picks on the field even in a part-time role.

That all being said, I am trusting the Packers more than what I wanted because well, I freaking SUCK at drafting (e.g. my disgust in Packers taking WR Greg Jennings instead of WR Chad Jackson) and have since stopped getting bent out of shape over a pick.

I thought this was interesting about Jordan Love. Figured since this is a JORDAN LOVE topic, we should PROBABLY talk about the dude.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



So it sounds like we agree then. We were both hoping and thinking that we should not have drafted (especially not traded up) a QB in round 1 this year.

Also- there have been plenty of instances where first round players made big impacts on teams their rookie year. It’s not unreasonable to think that’s possible. Perhaps this year is a bit different since there is going to practically be no offseason.

UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

Okay, serious post:

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 


Fantastic post, sir. You said almost everything I was planning on saying, only you put it better than I could have. I've been secretly rooting for the Packers to take Love ever since the idea first started being floated a couple months ago, but I kept my wish to myself because I don't feel qualified to talk intelligently about college football.

In any case, I've been wanting the Packers to take a quarterback high for a couple years now, and I'm absolutely loving this pick, mainly because I think it will help reveal Rodgers' true colors. If this makes Rodgers rise to the occasion, take a few more risks in key situations, and give all of the tools at his disposal the benefit of the doubt, great—the Packers have the potential to sweep through the NFC like the Mongol horde. If he chooses to sulk or pout and turns all passive-aggressive on management and coaching staff like he did with the previous regime, then some of the shine and mystique surrounding him will wear off, and he'll punch his ticket out of Green Bay. There will always be another team willing to take a flyer on him for the right price.

Meanwhile, as disappointing as it might be not to have brought in a top-flight receiver, maybe it's not such a great loss. With Rodgers' increasingly risk-averse (and some might say entitled) mentality, drafting an elite pass catcher have turned out to be casting pearls before swine, especially in a year in which rookies are going to get effectively no offseason reps. This way the Packers get their quarterback of the future for the same price as they would have paid for an inexperienced—and likely underused—wide receiver. I don't see it as any great loss, and it could turn out to be a great gain, particularly if another team comes knocking with a tranche of valuable picks on offer. All of which is to say that taking a receiver in the first round could easily have turned out to be just as much of a waste in the short term as taking a quarterback appears to be right now.

For those of you wishing for a receiver, tight end, or linebacker, can you think of any teams who might be on the market for a win-now quarterback and could have quality receiving or linebacking talent they'd be willing to swap?

As for all the Packers fans on Twitter whining that Green Bay is disrespecting Aaron Rodgers and threatening to stop watching games, they're idiots and can be dismissed out of hand. This is a business, a brutal, coldhearted business, and there's no room for sentimentality. When the time comes to move on from Aaron Rodgers, which based on the terms of his contract probably won't be for another year or two, tear the Band-Aid off quickly and be done with it.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

The Packers overachieved in 2019, in large part due to winning close games. History suggests they won’t have the same kind of success next year in these kinds of games. I think they are closer to an 8 or 9-win team than they are to a 13-win team. They are far more than a rookie WR or rookie LB away. This roster needs a ton of work.

Point 2 is that Rodgers has 3 years left on his contract. He will play that deal out, while Love sits behind him and develops. Love then gets 1 year to prove it before Green Bay can excercise his 5th year option (assuming he does). . . . But there is logic behind the pick. It’s not as if GB panicked. They clearly have a vision and it looks a lot like what Ron Wolf and Ted Thompson did.

Originally Posted by: porky88 


Thank you. I made these very same points in the chat last night. Gutekunst signaled pretty clearly in the media that he was interested in taking a quarterback early. People may have assumed he was throwing out red herrings, but it's not like this is coming out of the blue.

For those who are wondering why Gutekunst traded up, a couple of thoughts: First, he only had to trade away a fourth-round pick to move up. If he genuinely believes he has his quarterback of the future, that's not a steep price to pay, especially since no player taken at that spot in the first round was likely to make an immediate impact on offense anyway. Second, it's entirely possible that Gutekunst had his finger to the wind and learned that some other team was prepared to make a move to take Love (rumors have circulated that Seattle Indy, for example, was keen on him), and he simply preempted them. Like Matt said, Gutekunst had his vision, and he executed it. Right or wrong I applaud him for playing the cards he was dealt.

For the record, I don't think the comparison to the Saints are on point. New Orleans has a much more solid roster from top to bottom and truly is in a win-now mode. They also don't have a quarterback who has shown a tendency to be temperamental. Brees takes what he's given and makes the best of it.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

there have been plenty of instances where first round players made big impacts on teams their rookie year.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 


Sure, but how many of those players had next to no practice time? I think the injury rate for rookies is going to spike this year. They're just not going to be in football shape. On the other hand, they're going to have plenty of time to study the playbook this offseason.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

By that standard, the Packers got a good deal on Love.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

I had the exact same thought: Gutekunst signaled his willingness to draft a quarterback early last year. It didn't work out. There's no reason to be stunned that he would be willing to try again this year.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
One of the reasons this site is so valuable to me is the different point of view. I really did not like this pick at first, but reading through some of the following brought me to a net neutral position. There were a lot of great posts, but I want to point out just three that were excellent so thank you esp to Porky, Zero, and Dr. NSD these are great thoughts

I keep reading that GB needs to win now because of Rodgers and that they are one or two players away. Look, I wish that was the case, but the Packers were hardly a dominant football team last year. They struggled against Washington, Detroit, and Carolina - who all picked in the top 10. San Diego whipped them. The Packers overachieved in 2019, in large part due to winning close games. History suggests they won’t have the same kind of success next year in these kinds of games. I think they are closer to an 8 or 9-win team than they are to a 13-win team. They are far more than a rookie WR or rookie LB away. This roster needs a ton of work.

Originally Posted by: porky88 


DrNSD

In any case, I've been wanting the Packers to take a quarterback high for a couple years now, and I'm absolutely loving this pick, mainly because I think it will help reveal Rodgers' true colors. If this makes Rodgers rise to the occasion, take a few more risks in key situations, and give all of the tools at his disposal the benefit of the doubt, great—the Packers have the potential to sweep through the NFC like the Mongol horde. If he chooses to sulk or pout and turns all passive-aggressive on management and coaching staff like he did with the previous regime, then some of the shine and mystique surrounding him will wear off, and he'll punch his ticket out of Green Bay. There will always be another team willing to take a flyer on him for the right price.


Zero,

If anyone thinks a rookie is going to come in and be the difference, they don't really understand nor appreciate the thorough ass whipping the Packers took from the 49ers ... twice. Outside of maybe Chase Young, there is not anyone in this draft (based on the "experts" analysis) that would have helped.



I really think they wanted the USC tackle who was projected as a late 1 early 2, When he was gone I think they figured....what the hell, this is the best player on the board.

Also remember, it was the junior year tape of Brett F the Ron Wolf looked at to trade for #4. As Beast pointed out, the kid's junior year was terrific, in a good system, with some talent around him.

Perhaps they think Funchess is better than we do. In addition to a tackle, I still think we need a slot guy, a LB and an interior DL.

On to round 2.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Fan Shout
beast (6h) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (6h) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (13h) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (14h) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (15h) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (15h) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (15h) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (17h) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (23h) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
dfosterf (29-Jul) : 50 cent hookers? I'm moving to Green Bay. I thought it was just real estate that was more affordable there. 😂
Zero2Cool (29-Jul) : Sure seems site going down more than 50¢ hooker
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : Golden with two TDs in red zone drills today
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : @JacobMorley Shoutout to Quinn Ewers for allowing Matthew Golden to be available when Green Bay picked.
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (27-Jul) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (27-Jul) : *Friday*
dfosterf (27-Jul) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.