I get a kick out of how Starks gets the overwhelming majority of carries (showing that the organization believes most in him), yet he still is behind Brandon Jackson, then John Kuhn in the depth chart.  He was (yesterday) behind Dimitri Nance, but has now moved ahead of him. Just interesting to me that he is still behind the other two. Not that it matters. Just interesting.

---

I think it's more remarkable that James Jones is listed behind Donald Driver as a 2nd-string receiver. Maybe his inopportune drops have factored into that.

---

I think that Driver is still our #2, he just has been falling behind a little this year because of his injury. I still believe that he is our true #2.

---

I don't put much stock in the teams depth chart. They play around with it to motivate players or to attempt to misdirect other teams. I have found other sites more honest in their assessments. especially in the preseason.

technically Starks can be the 3rd string RB and still be most of the carries in this offense.

---

O-L, and lot of the D the depth chart means something

WR, RB not so much

Proof that depth charts don't mean squat.
Zero's thread  where Mike announces Starks will be the lead RB.
yet if you go to the Packer depth chart he is still listed  as #3.

---