3 INTs and 1 pick 6 in 5 games.

Show me JUST ONE of the other 31 NFL teams who wouldn't want Woodson on their team. So he whiffed on 2 tackles. Let's fire everyone who whiffs on 2 tackles in a game.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

Bishop leads the team with 43 tackles, Hawk only has 19!!!!!

Time to cut him loose. He is obviously overpaid and isn't worth the roster spot.

C'mon Ted cut the payroll and give one of those practice sqad guys a chance.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

3 INTs and 1 pick 6 in 5 games.

Show me JUST ONE of the other 31 NFL teams who wouldn't want Woodson on their team. So he whiffed on 2 tackles. Let's fire everyone who whiffs on 2 tackles in a game.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

Your comparison doesn't work. Maybe if Francois or Dj Smith had 30ish tackles and were playing more than Hawk every game. Which if that was the case Hawk would be horribly overpaid.

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded 

What's the point of this? You really honestly don't agree that Woodsons skills are declining?

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded 

Yes, but not by the amount some of you all think he will.

Check the INT leaders in the NFL. Check where Woodson is.

Well, what do you know? Tied for first in the NFL. Check where Woodson is with solo tackles and compare it to the other 63 starting CBs in the NFL. Well, what do you know? He's in the top 5.

Damn. Definitely have to cut him then.

My word. You people are all [duh]

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

I don't know where the hell you get those solo tackle stats. NFL.com and PFF neither have him in the top 20 of cornerback solo tackles this year.
He's also allowed the 7th most yards in coverage this year.
But this is all beside the point. Stats can give you a start but if you watch the games, you know Woodson isn't the same. He still a guy who makes big plays, but overall his coverage skills have declined quite a bit.

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland 

Out of my ass. Whoops. Now I'm wondering where I got that stat from.
Yes, he's lost a step. But should we get rid of him? Hell no. That's what I was pissed off about.
Move him to Safety next year and he'll excel. He's still a good tackler (yes, I'm well aware of his whiffs last game, happens to everyone, even Lawrence Taylor). And he also has a nose for the football. INT stats don't lie.
Of those wanting to get rid of Sir Charles, nobody has yet to respond to him leading the NFL in INTs (tied) after 5 weeks.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

Who said anything about wanting to get rid of Charles..?

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland