brnt247
15 years ago

Brnt I was just judging by the teams and how good they will be next year, you can bank on pittsburgh, baltimore, eagles, giants, Tampa will all be strong teams. And gimmie a fricken break people saying Ted Thompson picking up a few playmakers hahahahaha that makes me laugh so hard. And Brnt what makes you think you have so much knowledge of the NFL just because i can look at a team and give an honest opinion about it unlike you. How the hell do you know Rodgers is going to be any good or that this team will be better next year?

"dhazer" wrote:



First of all, when did I even say they would be good? I simply stated that it is downright stupid to try and project records for next season when this season isn't even over. Teams are going to lose or gain players to free agency, injuries, retirement, trades, etc... Looking at the young talent on this team compared to many of the aforementioned teams,(Tampa, Pittsburgh, Philly) it is pretty hard to look at this teams future in a pessimistic fashion. If you truly feel that way then I don't understand why you are even a fan of this team. I understand giving an honest opinion, but I just can't understand how someone who likes this team and watches a majority of their games can think that they are so terrible, unless you are watching games with a personal bias against a player or the team in general.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
The Buccaneers are NOT consistent winners. Here are their composite records for the past three decades:

2000-2008: 79-69-0 (.534)

1990-1999: 69-95-0 (.421)

1980-1989: 45-108-1 (.295) -- worst record in the NFL!

Overall: 193-272-1 (.414)

Consistent, yes. Consistently bad.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
15 years ago

you can bank on pittsburgh, baltimore, eagles, giants, Tampa will all be strong teams.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Is that so?


Team          2007   2006   2005   2004   2003
Baltimore      5-11  13-3    6-10   9-7   10-6
Green Bay     13-3    8-8    4-12  10-6   10-6
New York      10-6*   8-8   11-5    6-10   4-12
Philadelphia   8-8   10-6   11-5   13-3   12-4
Pittsburgh    10-6    8-8   11-5*  15-1    6-10
Tampa Bay      9-7    4-12  11-5    5-11   7-9

*Denotes Superbowl victory

Over the past five years, Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Tampa Bay are a combined 222-178-0 (.555). In other words, pretty mediocre. By way of comparison, Green Bay is 45-35-0 (.563) over that same stretch. Not much better, but definitely not worse. And given that everyone of those five teams has had AT LEAST one non-winning season in that five-year stretch, your assertion has no standing whatsoever.

Now, just to be fair, I'll include this season's records.

Team          2008   2007   2006   2005   2004   2003
Baltimore     11-2    5-11  13-3    6-10   9-7   10-6
Green Bay      5-8   13-3    8-8    4-12  10-6   10-6
New York      11-2   10-6*   8-8   11-5    6-10   4-12
Philadelphia   7-5    8-8   10-6   11-5   13-3   12-4
Pittsburgh    10-3   10-6    8-8   11-5*  15-1    6-10
Tampa Bay      9-4    9-7    4-12  11-5    5-11   7-9

*Denotes Superbowl victory

Now if we Include this season, the picture changes somewhat. The other five teams' records rise to a combined 270-194-0 (.581) vs. Green Bay's 50-43-1 (.537). But then, you cherry-picked your examples very well; by strange coincidence, they're all having good seasons this year. :-D

But the fact remains: you can't predict anything one season to the next. With these teams alone, we have an example of a team going 6-10 one season and 15-1 the next (Pittsburgh), a team going 13-3 one season and 5-11 the next (Baltimore), and of course, a team going 13-3 one season and starting out 8-5 the next.

You just don't know.

"dhazer" wrote:



No offense, but you can't judge teams by their pasts. You have to look at how good they are this year. Every one of those teams are better than the Packers.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
But that wasn't his point. His point was that those teams are bankable -- and I showed that they aren't. None of them are predictable year to year.
UserPostedImage
JackoPack
15 years ago
ok but my initial post was that why was there no patience and instant gratification fans only when it came to Brett Favre last year? Why is there patience for Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy but not BF?
don't unnerstand that. can anyone 'spain that to me?

There was no patience with Favre last year by many. My question is why the double standard for TT?

anyone? anyone?

Buehler?
blank
longtimefan
15 years ago

you can bank on pittsburgh, baltimore, eagles, giants, Tampa will all be strong teams.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



Is that so?


Team          2007   2006   2005   2004   2003
Baltimore      5-11  13-3    6-10   9-7   10-6
Green Bay     13-3    8-8    4-12  10-6   10-6
New York      10-6*   8-8   11-5    6-10   4-12
Philadelphia   8-8   10-6   11-5   13-3   12-4
Pittsburgh    10-6    8-8   11-5*  15-1    6-10
Tampa Bay      9-7    4-12  11-5    5-11   7-9

*Denotes Superbowl victory

Over the past five years, Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Tampa Bay are a combined 222-178-0 (.555). In other words, pretty mediocre. By way of comparison, Green Bay is 45-35-0 (.563) over that same stretch. Not much better, but definitely not worse. And given that everyone of those five teams has had AT LEAST one non-winning season in that five-year stretch, your assertion has no standing whatsoever.

Now, just to be fair, I'll include this season's records.

Team          2008   2007   2006   2005   2004   2003
Baltimore     11-2    5-11  13-3    6-10   9-7   10-6
Green Bay      5-8   13-3    8-8    4-12  10-6   10-6
New York      11-2   10-6*   8-8   11-5    6-10   4-12
Philadelphia   7-5    8-8   10-6   11-5   13-3   12-4
Pittsburgh    10-3   10-6    8-8   11-5*  15-1    6-10
Tampa Bay      9-4    9-7    4-12  11-5    5-11   7-9

*Denotes Superbowl victory

Now if we Include this season, the picture changes somewhat. The other five teams' records rise to a combined 270-194-0 (.581) vs. Green Bay's 50-43-1 (.537). But then, you cherry-picked your examples very well; by strange coincidence, they're all having good seasons this year. :-D

But the fact remains: you can't predict anything one season to the next. With these teams alone, we have an example of a team going 6-10 one season and 15-1 the next (Pittsburgh), a team going 13-3 one season and 5-11 the next (Baltimore), and of course, a team going 13-3 one season and starting out 8-5 the next.

You just don't know.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



No offense, but you can't judge teams by their pasts. You have to look at how good they are this year. Every one of those teams are better than the Packers.

"dhazer" wrote:



Ummmmm

Dh said you can bank on those teams, show us how they are so constant to prove that theory from DH
4PackGirl
15 years ago

ok but my initial post was that why was there no patience and instant gratification fans only when it came to Brett Favre last year? Why is there patience for Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy but not Brett Favre?
don't unnerstand that. can anyone 'spain that to me?

There was no patience with Favre last year by many. My question is why the double standard for Ted Thompson?

anyone? anyone?

Buehler?

"JackoPack" wrote:



well i'm not sure where you're from jacko but if any player was EVER given "free passes" on a weekly basis from his fans, it'd be brett favre with the packers - me included!!!!
Cheesey
15 years ago

ok but my initial post was that why was there no patience and instant gratification fans only when it came to Brett Favre last year? Why is there patience for Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy but not Brett Favre?
don't unnerstand that. can anyone 'spain that to me?

There was no patience with Favre last year by many. My question is why the double standard for Ted Thompson?

anyone? anyone?

Buehler?

"JackoPack" wrote:


Maybe the loss of patience for Favre was the fact that we went through the "will he won't he" retire crap for 3 or 4 years already.
I don't think thats being impatient.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
15 years ago
I actually agree. The Lions are not entirely awful (the record of course SCREAMS otherwise)... but they have been around in most of these games and just end up losing out in the late part of the game. That is exactly what we have been doing for weeks. I have no idea how the game will unfold.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Cheesey
15 years ago
Right now i don't see us beating anyone, Lions included.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (21m) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
    dfosterf (24m) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
    dfosterf (26m) : We got Peter Bowde
    dfosterf (1h) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
    dfosterf (1h) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
    beast (12h) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : damn those vikings
    beast (13h) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
    beast (14h) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
    beast (14h) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
    beast (14h) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
    TheKanataThrilla (14h) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
    dhazer (20h) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
    TheKanataThrilla (21h) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
    dhazer (21h) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
    Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
    Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
    Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
    beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
    Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
    Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
    beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
    beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
    TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
    Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
    Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
    TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
    TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
    Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
    Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
    Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
    beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
    wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
    Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
    Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.