Zero2Cool
3 years ago
Aaron Jones is a helluva talent, that's not something I'd debate. I will say he's going to get far more money than he's worth (even relatively speaking. Jamaal Williams isn't going to break a 70+ yarder, but he has shown to be more consistent than Jones in getting positive yards.

If they both came at the same price, I would take Jones every time. If Jamaal comes at 50% of Jones, I'll take Jamaal.

If we had Jordan Love running the show, I would say Jones even at $10-12 million/year over three years is worth it.

As for OL, we need lots of depth there. The better the OL, the better the running game and subsequently the passing game.

As for defense in a topic about Aaron Jones (? - lol I love this place). We need to bolster our DL, which makes LB's better, which makes CB's better. Trying to land CB's is akin to fixing a symptom of the problem, rather than the root of the problem. And the root of the problem is the QB getting comfortable in the pocket. Make that QB uncomfortable and you can win a lot of games with ball hawking CB's.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago
You know what? A franchise tag might be the best way to do this. AJ has hired Leigh Steinberg, so it seems like he wants to get paid. Thing is, this year is not the year to go for that big contract.

Right now, teams are cutting players to get under the cap. Not only is that going to create a downward pressure on salaries, but it's going to make more guys who can play available. Guys with huge contracts are going to be vulnerable. AJ will have to compete with those guys.

However if AJ gets franchise tagged, he will have a pretty decent contract for one year, then he can hit the market after another chance at a ring, with an expanding salary cap, plenty of money available. To me, that's a double upside.

The risk is with injury next season. But this pitch count has worked very well for him. Hell, he could hedge that risk with an insurance policy. Steinberg is the best, he can hook AJ up with something like that.

This is not the best year to try and get paid.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
3 years ago

You know what? A franchise tag might be the best way to do this. AJ has hired Leigh Steinberg, so it seems like he wants to get paid. Thing is, this year is not the year to go for that big contract.

Right now, teams are cutting players to get under the cap. Not only is that going to create a downward pressure on salaries, but it's going to make more guys who can play available. Guys with huge contracts are going to be vulnerable. AJ will have to compete with those guys.

However if AJ gets franchise tagged, he will have a pretty decent contract for one year, then he can hit the market after another chance at a ring, with an expanding salary cap, plenty of money available. To me, that's a double upside.

The risk is with injury next season. But this pitch count has worked very well for him. Hell, he could hedge that risk with an insurance policy. Steinberg is the best, he can hook AJ up with something like that.

This is not the best year to try and get paid.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


AJ still under his rookie contract. Aaron Jones signing the Franchise Tag might be best for him and the team. Keep rocking out while getting paid and then cash in big in 2022 with a Super Bowl ring. Maybe even try to re-sign Jamaal Williams long-term.

UserPostedImage
Cheesey
3 years ago
I agree 100% Zero.
Keep both RBs if at all possible. It won’t be long and we won’t have a realistic shot at a super bowl. Go all in NOW, or regret it.
They SHOULD have did it this past season. A few major pickups on defense (some good FAs), and they could have been getting their rings.
Instead, just another disapointing wasted season.
With a much tougher schedule, they might not even make the playoffs.
Rodgers just saw what a REAL “all in” team can do (Tampa Bay) and they won it all. It has to be frustrating for him.
We can’t afford to LOSE good players. It will make getting there even harder.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
3 years ago

I agree 100% Zero.
Keep both RBs if at all possible. It won’t be long and we won’t have a realistic shot at a super bowl. Go all in NOW, or regret it.
They SHOULD have did it this past season. A few major pickups on defense (some good FAs), and they could have been getting their rings.
Instead, just another disapointing wasted season.
With a much tougher schedule, they might not even make the playoffs.
Rodgers just saw what a REAL “all in” team can do (Tampa Bay) and they won it all. It has to be frustrating for him.
We can’t afford to LOSE good players. It will make getting there even harder.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



The Buccaneers were not an all in team. They were an amazing defensive team with a menacing DL and incredible LBs. They just needed a QB who wouldn't turn the ball over over two times a game lol.

Packers don't need to murder their future for a chance this year. They gotta get that DL to punish teams. And improve the OL, which might be hard without Corey Linsley. Maybe franchise Linsley and transition tag Aaron Jones?

Can a team use two tags? Lol
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
3 years ago

The Buccaneers were not an all in team. They were an amazing defensive team with a menacing DL and incredible LBs. They just needed a QB who wouldn't turn the ball over over two times a game lol.

Packers don't need to murder their future for a chance this year. They gotta get that DL to punish teams. And improve the OL, which might be hard without Corey Linsley. Maybe franchise Linsley and transition tag Aaron Jones?

Can a team use two tags? Lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


To me, all in means getting the part, or parts that you need to get “the prize”. The Packers only needed a couple of players last season to bolster their defense to the point where they could compete against great teams like Tampa. They chose to sit on their hands and HOPE to get it done. And of course we know the results. And now with most likely losing some of the most important parts on offense, which kept us in most games, it’s going to make it even harder just to make the playoffs, let alone a Super Bowl.
Going “all in” now gives you at least a shot.
Not going all in means not even getting close.
When we lose Rodgers, which most likely won't be long from now, we have no idea if Love, or any other QB will be good. We’ve been lucky to have back to back great QBs. I seriously doubt we will have a third.
Look at all the NFL teams that have been trying, without results, to have even ONE QB great the last 30 years? Aaron Rodgers threw 48 TDs last season. You would think that would be enough. If the Packer brass don’t do what is necessary to win another championship, then they have failed.
Like Lombardi said, if you are not first, you are last.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
3 years ago
The Packers had all the parts to get the Super Bowl in 2019 and 2020. Sometimes, the other team is just better. There is not magical recipe, and I know you're not saying that. It just seems people think there's some recipe to going all-in, and if the team doesn't win it all then they didn't. The Buccaneers are not a team that went in all-in by any definition that I can fathom. They didn't really add a whole lot. Yes, they landed Tom Brady. Who when you look at QB play from 2019 vs 2020, you'll see the Buccaneers were a damn good team if not for their piss poor QB turning the ball over with 30 INT"s and losing 9 fumbles. You can't get to the promised land when your QB is giving the opposing offense 39 extra offensive shots.

We already know Aaron Rodgers cannot win it on his own. Look at the history of it. The defense does not do it's job. I think the defense gave up over 30 points in each of the post-season losses.

My gosh, this is frustrating. If the Packers brass doesn't do what is necessary? Do we fans think they want to lose? I don't understand this mindset at all. And by who's definition are we setting this? Yours? Mine? Some shock-jock radio personality? I mean, we do understand that only ONE team wins the Super Bowl every year, right? It's not little league where a trophy is handed out for league participation, lol.

The Green Bay Packers have reached the NFC Championship back-to-back years and I keep seeing fans acting like the Packers are the Bengals or something. There seems to be an all or nothing mentality. I even saw someone say the Packers franchise should be ashamed for only winning two Super Bowls in 30 years between Favre and Rodgers. Can anyone be anymore narrow-minded?

We are so damn fortunate as Packers fans to have a team that is in position to be a threat for a NFL Championship year-in, year-out that I feel we have gotten insanely spoiled rather than appreciating the greatness.

Anyhow, as for the Packers sitting on their hands in 2020. How is it we forget the additions of Adrian Amos, Za'Darius Smith and Preston Smith? Teams can't keep a revolving door and be competitive. And what defensive players were out there that we could have added? What players would have put us over the top?

The Packers defense got something like three interceptions off Tom Brady and snared just one touchdown from it. Winning a Super Bowl is not a science. You need luck on your side and when David Bakhtiari got injured, our luck was shot. Without our OL healthy, we had little to no chance. I feel confident that if 69 was on the field, the Packers were going to the Super Bowl.

In my opinion -- Packers are not far off at all. Get a starter on the OL and some depth on the OL. Add a DL that can help Kenny Clark, even if that means bringing back Damon Harrison and actually PLAYING him. Kamal Martin and Khrys Barnes are going to take that jump in year two (fingers crossed, lol).
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago
Packers failure to address the CB position was their downfall, once Kenny Clark and got to playing elite again, the DL was good.

The Packers got a pretty good pass rush, they just can't force the QB to hold the ball long enough for the pass rushers to get there without better coverage guys.

And to Zero's point, franchising Aaron Jones surprisingly might actually be best for Jones with the low market this year. Next year might be better for him to get a huge long term deal, and Packers have a proven quick guy to go with the still a bit uncertain power of Dillon.

I love Dillon's potential, but the two things that sorta makes me nervous to go with as the lead back are, RBs get injured often, we need more than one good one.

And two, Rodgers reaction post Titans game, where he sorta said the correct PR thing, we knew someone could step up... then followed it with something, like uncertainty, because they hadn't seen it much in practice.

Very deep into the season and he hadn't seen much of it? And also Rodgers doing the hidden finger pointing to make sure Dillon is going the right way... make me think Dillon had more struggle learning the language of the system (which even Rodgers has said is long).


But I really think two good CBs, one DL and a few more offensive weapons and this team could be unstoppable if the OL can hold up and they stay healthy. Yeah a lot of ifs, but that's for all teams.

The Buccaneers front 7 is so good, you have to be able to punch them in the mouth, and I said we'd need to be able to use Dillon's power running on them as Jones ain't running away from those speed ILBers. But really Bucs don't matter until players.

Who does matter is NFC North, NFC West, AFC North, Saints, Washington and maybe Chiefs if that's the 17th game.

Lots and lots of tough lines in there... need to improve CB and the lines the most.

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago
We know we were the best team. Sometimes you gotta beat the officials too.

Our team gets more favorable calls than most. But nobody gets them like Brady. Fortunately Aaron says and does all the right things. They'll toss him one. We just have to get back there.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
3 years ago
I don’t disagree, Zero.
Remember, I lived through over 20 years of futility, watching loss after loss.
So I’m not taking the Packers last 30 years for granted at all.
I just figure that the “gravy train” will be pulling into the station soon, and we will be back to beating the Bears one game in a season as a good year. I’m not looking forward to that at all.
This is where I sometimes think a team owner is better. They want the trophy.
With a board of guys, who makes the ultimate choice of what to do? The old “too many cooks spoils the soup” thing.
Of course I don’t know what goes on behind closed doors there. I’m ONLY a fan. And I sure don’t know more then they do.
My comments come from the heart.....not so much from the brain sometimes.
I’m sure they want to win.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (2h) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (2h) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (2h) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (3h) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (3h) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (14h) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (15h) : damn those vikings
beast (15h) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (15h) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (15h) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (15h) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (22h) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (23h) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (23h) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.