earthquake
14 years ago
I agree that there should be some sort of outlet for smokers in public, outdoor places, but i can't really think of a good solution to the problem. I think its a tricky situation. Oh well, you could always quit! 🙂
blank
dfosterf
14 years ago
This is one of the MAJOR reasons I like Aaron Rodgers. God looks out for drunks and fools. They passed the smoking ban just prior to opening day of the football season. I was two-packing it whenever Brett played.

Thanks to Aaron, I mostly make it outside mid-game to smoke, and don't miss that many plays. Unfortunately as I progressively get a bit of a load on...I forget and light up in the bar while watching. Everyone understands, and you hear this "DAVID!" I look down and see the cig burning. OOPS.

If Brett was playing, I think I would just go ahead and put $250.00 (fine, first offense) in the back of my wallet and say screw it. Gabby (Gabriella, my bartender) just "holds" my cigs for me nowadays when I go, kind of like a 28 year old mom that has to watch over her 53 yr old son.

We do have a "mom and pop bar" exception here. It has to do with a max # of employees, plus separate entrances, plus separate ventilation, plus the Knights of Columbus exception, plus the VFW exception, Plus the American Legion exception.
You can smoke there, but will be subjected to -- A way higher incidence of rednecks, war stories, and men, dependent upon which exception you opt for, or mostly all three.

I'll stick to the no smoking bar, flying mostly solo on the whole redneck (I prefer sodbuster-no hills) war story and man thing...or at least the correct dosage of it as can be found in this place, comparatively.

It does take getting used to..Rodgers definitely helped.
Dulak
14 years ago
Ahh finally! and Great!

being an individual whom suffers from a serious breathing condition I apprecitate this new law.

Had to put up with smoke for years everytime I went out with my friends to the bars etc ...

Thats one of the things I like about london - no smoking in public places; although as soon as you exit the bar you are hit with like 10 smokers standing there all puffing away.

Went back home for christmas and went out with my friend (milwaukee)and came home smelling like an ash-try.

July 2010 (long wait) but will be nice to go out and enjoy a beer and not have to breath in everyones 2nd hand smoke (which is worse then smoking) - which I never have done.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Good riddance! Ever notice some of the most annoying people are those who smoke? For instance, my daughters mother. :)

"DakotaT" wrote:



Is that a slick way of saying your ex-wife?

I have a feeling this thread is going to the back alley.

"SlickVision" wrote:



Hell no. I've made many mistakes in my life, marriage has yet to be one of them.

Why would it go to the back alley? Because he mentions college football?
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
14 years ago
No Smoking the seating area in an outdoor stadium is right.

I have no challenge with smoking areas outside the bowl in an outdoor stadium.

Pot is much worse than tobacco... really.

I use to have season seats for the Raiders in section 14 in LA. I swear, I was half stoned by the 4th Quarter, just from inhaling that crap.

Dubers where being passed down the row what seemed like every 10 minutes. No exaggeration.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Cheesey
14 years ago
I think it's a dumb law.
Do i like being around smoke? No.
But it should be left up to the BUSINESS OWNER whether or not they allow it or not. As long as smoking itslef is legal, what does government have a right to dictate if you allow smoking in your establishment?

Let the PATRONS decide if they want to be in a place that allows it or not. If they lose enough business, they can CHOOSE to go smoke free if they want.
And no one forces you to go to a place that allows smoking. If you don't like it, don't go there.

What i find so interesting is it will NOT affect INDIAN CASINOS in Wisconsin. Thats our "great" Govenor Doyle. The Native Americans cut a sweet deal with him where they don't have to pay very much (as compared to before) to the state from their gambing revenue. In return, he got all of them to back him.
Now he slips them some more business, as smokers will go to the casinos just because they can smoke and drink. Pretty sweet deal, hey? Thats our wonderful Govenor. He should be run out on a rail for that alone.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago

Now he slips them some more business, as smokers will go to the casinos just because they can smoke and drink. Pretty sweet deal, hey? Thats our wonderful Govenor. He should be run out on a rail for that alone.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I got to disagree with you there; people dont go places so they can smoke. They do things and smoke where they do things.

People go out just as much in london as they did pre-ban - its not like they wont go out now cuz they cant smoke indoors. The econ affects some peeps but still bars are quite busy.

but ya I dont see why its ok to smoke at indian casinos ... not like they are in another country.
Cheesey
14 years ago
I know. It's not right. Why do THEY get a free ride?
And i KNOW that people will go there to drink knowing that they can light up when they want.
If EVERY place had the ban, then at LEAST it would be fair and equal. And as i'm sure you know, alot of people that sit at bars also smoke.
So if they have a choice of going to their local pub, or drive a few miles to a casino so that they can endulge their other habit, what do you think they will do?
If you don't think that will affect small business owners, your kidding yourself.
I don't like to be around smoking, but "big brother" has his hand in EVERYTHING we do now adays.
In Wisconsin you can legally drive a motorcycle without wearing a helmet, but if you are in a car and not wearing a seatbelt, you get a ticket. What kind of sense does that make??? If you are on a motorcycle and get in an accident, you have alot more of a chance of getting killed with no helmet. In a car, at least you are enclosed in something, not out in the open.
Government is getting WAY too big.
Leave seat belts and smoking up to the individual.
JMO
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago

I know. It's not right. Why do THEY get a free ride?
And i KNOW that people will go there to drink knowing that they can light up when they want.
If EVERY place had the ban, then at LEAST it would be fair and equal. And as i'm sure you know, alot of people that sit at bars also smoke.
So if they have a choice of going to their local pub, or drive a few miles to a casino so that they can endulge their other habit, what do you think they will do?
If you don't think that will affect small business owners, your kidding yourself.
I don't like to be around smoking, but "big brother" has his hand in EVERYTHING we do now adays.
In Wisconsin you can legally drive a motorcycle without wearing a helmet, but if you are in a car and not wearing a seatbelt, you get a ticket. What kind of sense does that make??? If you are on a motorcycle and get in an accident, you have alot more of a chance of getting killed with no helmet. In a car, at least you are enclosed in something, not out in the open.
Government is getting WAY too big.
Leave seat belts and smoking up to the individual.
JMO

"Cheesey" wrote:



It does negatively impact a lot of bar and restaurant owners. Everyone of those that could reasonable apply for a waiver did so. I have talked to several about it, along with the bartenders that have seen their tips go down in a major way.

Has to do with the customers they have always sought and many times built their business to cater to. Mom and dad with the kids don't get schnockered at the bar and tip good. They are frugal. They love the ban.

Many of the bars and restaurants here KNOW they are not eligible due to the # of employees and beverage/food ratios, but have spent tens of thousand of dollars just to separate the bar area from the food in order to be able to continue with the smoking section while they wait to have their application DENIED. They KNOW it will be denied, but because of the back log, as long as they meet the aforementioned conditions, they can still allow the smokers in while it is pending. The fact that they did that speaks volumes about the impact of a smoking ban in areas where a significantly larger percentage of the population still smokes comparative to other areas. (Such as central PA.)

There are demographics at play here also. More affluent, urbane and urban type settings are less likely to get creamed than joe six-pack bluecollarville.

A waiver was granted here in PA for the casinos also. I've been there. No one smokes in it. It is more of that upscale demographic I spoke of. They could have banned smoking in there with no impact, imo.

All the waivers that were granted here were seen initially as "unfair" and the whole "should have banned everywhere" argument ran hot and heavy.

Hasn't turned out that way, except for those bar owners and bar tenders that used to heavily cater to a regular crowd at their larger, upscale-type bar. Those drunks have moved on to smokier pastures, and it DOES impact their bottom line rather badly. Fortunately, because they are "big" enough, they have been able to absorb the loss. This is why the mom and pop bars got exemptions. They cater to the "regular crowd" that they have had for years, and those guys would have just gone to the American Legion.

NO WAY the legislature here could ban smoking in them. This state is loaded with veterans that smoke, and they vote pretty much en block on stuff, and that was an issue.

As big a cluster-fuck as it looks like on the outside, and as big of one everyone thought it would be here---it fit this state to a "T".

You can pretty much tell where smoking is allowed by how seedy the bar looks from the street. If it looks like a dive, you can smoke there. Mom and dad and the kids were not going in there in the first place.
Tezzy
14 years ago
I don't mind the no smoking laws for public events. You can't just switch seats at a packers game if you are annoyed by someone smoking. But on the flip side, bars should be allowed to choose either way. Let the customer decide which environment they wish to be in. I for one can't shoot pool for crap unless I have cigarette smoke filtering my view.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
Fan Shout
beast (17h) : Not sure why a players views reflect on GB... instead of simply on the player
Martha Careful (17-May) : I bet some of us have had 6+ mRNA jabs, a UKR flag on our walls, and still think Fauci has a thread of integrity
Zero2Cool (16-May) : From what I've read, it's all Jets , not us.
CanPackFan (16-May) : Will there ever be a time when Rodgers' whacko views will not reflect on GB? He is the past, thank god.
Zero2Cool (16-May) : Jan 4th gonna be rough with that start time lol
Zero2Cool (16-May) : Packers schedule listed. Boom.
buckeyepackfan (15-May) : Let the leaks begin. Colts @ Packers week 2, Vikings @ Packers week 4
Zero2Cool (14-May) : WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling to Bills
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Jets and Aaron Rodgers open up on Monday Night Football,
Zero2Cool (13-May) : $170 guaranteed. This might impact Jordan Love
Zero2Cool (13-May) : Lions are signing QB Jared Goff to a four-year, $212 million extension
Zero2Cool (13-May) : I know we moved on. That tidbit just makes me a touch happier.
Zero2Cool (13-May) : Sources spoke of many, many times last summer where Hackett called a play, then Rodgers changed it completely at the line
Martha Careful (10-May) : 1. this is true of all our linemen. 2. His run block is fine. 3. If all OL played like he has, we would win SB.
beast (10-May) : Meyers pass blocking is really good, his run blocking is really not.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : Packers have claimed DE Spencer Waege off of waivers from the 49ers and waived DT Rodney Mathews.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : And the OL protections seem to be good.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : I really don't know lol. I don't see him getting blown up.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : -3 buwahhhahaaha
Mucky Tundra (9-May) : 4th
Zero2Cool (9-May) : because he's 1st
Mucky Tundra (9-May) : Myers isn't even the 3rd best C on the roster atm
Martha Careful (9-May) : I am not sure I understand the Myers hate. He was consistently our third best lineman. RG and LT were worse.
beast (9-May) : Just saying I don't think moving Myers would help Myers.
beast (9-May) : Center is usually considered the easiest position physically if you can handle the snap stuff.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : Bust it is then
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Context. Sounds like Myers won't be cross-trained. C or bust.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : @BookOfEli_NFL Packers pass game coordinator, Jason Vrable said that Jayden Reed and Dontayvion Wicks shared a placed in Florida while train
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : For now...
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Packers go about evaluating their "best five," OL coach Luke Butkus makes on thing clear: "Josh Myers is our center."
beast (8-May) : Though I'm a bit surprised letting go of CBs, I thought we needed more not less
beast (8-May) : It was confusing with two DB Anthony Johnson anyways
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Packers actually had Ray Lewis on the phone.
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Packers wanted to draft Ray Lewis. Ravens stole him.
Martha Careful (6-May) : Happy 93rd Birthday to the Greatest Baseball Player of All-Time...Willie Mays
Zero2Cool (6-May) : Walter Stanely's son
buckeyepackfan (6-May) : and released CB Anthony Johnson and DL Deandre Johnson and waived/injured WR Thyrick Pitts (thigh-rick).
buckeyepackfan (6-May) : The Green Bay Packers have signed WR Julian Hicks, OL Lecitus Smith (luh-SEET-us) and WR Dimitri Stanley
Zero2Cool (6-May) : Petty, but it's annoying me how the NFL is making the schedule release an event.
Mucky Tundra (4-May) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on how he tore his pec: “Got in a fight with the bench press. I lost.”
Zero2Cool (3-May) : Jordan Love CAN sign an extension as of today. Might tak weeks/months though
TheKanataThrilla (3-May) : Packers decline 5th year option for Stokes
Mucky Tundra (3-May) : @ProFootballTalk Jaylen Warren: Steelers' special teams coach has discussed Justin Fields returning kicks.
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Season officially ending tonight for Bucks ... sad face
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Giannis Antetokounmpo is listed as out for tonight's game.
dfosterf (2-May) : Surprisingly low initially is my guess cap wise, but gonna pay the piper after that
dfosterf (2-May) : The number on Love is going to be brutal.
Zero2Cool (2-May) : May 3rd. Extension day for Jordan Love. (soonest)
Zero2Cool (1-May) : USFL MVP QB Alex McGough moved to WR. So that's why no WR drafted!
earthquake (1-May) : Packers draft starters at safety ever few years. Collins, Clinton-Dix, Savage
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

11-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

7-May / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

7-May / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.