zombieslayer
14 years ago

How does this sound?

Wildcard round:

#6 Philadelphia defeats #3 Dallas
#5 Green Bay defeats #4 Arizona

Divisional round:

#6 Philadelphia defeats #1 New Orleans
#5 Green Bay defeats #2 Minnesota

Conference Championship AT LAMBEAU.
#5 Green Bay defeats #6 Philadelphia.

"IronMan" wrote:



I like it, but I got money on the Pack to win it all. Making it to the SB is nice but winning it is what matters.

So...

Who are we beating in the SB? :magnifyglass:

Back to our schedule, Pittsburg with or without Rottenburger is going to be tough in Pitts. They got a sick D, which was #1 in the NFL last year. Plus playing in Arizona will be tough.

It's going to be an exciting year.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
RaiderPride
14 years ago
The Packers have one big advantage....

They have a better QB than any of the teams they play from now until the end of the season.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
14 years ago

The sleeper team to watch is Atlanta...5-5 with the next 3 games at home, with 4 of theri last 6 at home.

As you said Packers win out and they will be in, just looking at Eagle,Giants and Falcons remaining schedule, IMHO Packers can afford 1 more loss and still make it to the play-offs, 2 more and it could be an iffy situation.

Stats:
Week. . . . . .12. . . ..13. . . . .14. . . .15. . . .16. . . . . .17
Dallas (8-3) W........vs nyg...vs sd...@no....@was......vs phi

Packers(7-4) W.........vs bal....@chi....@pit....vs sea......@ari

Eagles (6-4) vs was..@atl@...nyg.....vs sf....vs den.....@dal

Giants (6-5) L...........@dal.....vs phi..@was..vs car.....@min

Atlanta (5-5) vs TB....vs Phi....vs no...@nyj...vs buf.....@tb

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



I think 10-6 definitely gets us in. Eagles and Giants and Falcons beat up on eachother and ATL has to play N.O. As long as PHI and GB get 9 wins, maybe 10, they're in i think.

"dhazer" wrote:




I will be happy to salvage 2 wins out of the last 5

"Gravedigga" wrote:



Always the realist!!!! :icon_smile:

The Packers aren't playing perfect ball, they never have, but of all the teams listed, how many at this point in the season are playing better than The Packers?
We beat The Cowboys(who by the way we really have to root for now to knock off The Eagles and Giants).

The Giants are a mess right now.

The Eagles have been up and down.

The Falcons(as I posted earlier)is the team I most worry about, just because of their schedule.

Packers need to build on the success of the last 12 days, and make that play-off push that good teams do at this time of the year.

We Will see!!!

One at a time..Balt. a week from Monday!!! The games just keep getting bigger!!

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



The Falcons aren't as tough as I thought they would be this year, though. Ryan is having a bit of a sophomore slump, and Turner can't stay healthy.
UserPostedImage
Trippster
14 years ago
I see them going 3-2 over the last five weeks. that gets them to 10-6 and into the playoffs. A big point will be whether those three wins come agains NFC teams...that will be the deciding factor.
"Let Your Light Shine!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I think at least we split the AFC teams, Ravens and Steelers. I am however thinking we can beat both of them. Right now, this minute, I'm more worried about beating the Ravens than the Steelers.
UserPostedImage
macbob
14 years ago

The sleeper team to watch is Atlanta...5-5 with the next 3 games at home, with 4 of theri last 6 at home.

As you said Packers win out and they will be in, just looking at Eagle,Giants and Falcons remaining schedule, IMHO Packers can afford 1 more loss and still make it to the play-offs, 2 more and it could be an iffy situation.

Stats:
Week. . . . . .12. . . ..13. . . . .14. . . .15. . . .16. . . . . .17
Dallas (8-3) W........vs nyg...vs sd...@no....@was......vs phi
Packers(7-4) W.........vs bal....@chi....@pit....vs sea......@ari
Eagles (6-4) vs was..@atl@...nyg.....vs sf....vs den.....@dal
Giants (6-5) L...........@dal.....vs phi..@was..vs car.....@min
Atlanta (5-5) vs TB....vs Phi....vs no...@nyj...vs buf.....@tb

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



Predictions:
Dal 11-5 (L to SD/@NO)
Packers 9-7 (L to Bal/@Pit/@Ari, unless Ari resting players then 10-6)
Eagles 10-6 (L to Den/@Dal)
Giants 8-8 (L to @dal/phi/@min)
Atl 8-8 (L to Phi/NO/@NYJ)

Based on remaining schedule I'd expect us to make the playoffs. Travelling on the road to Dal, Minn, or Ari for the wildcard game I would not expect to make it past that first round, based on our current play (too many: penalties, special teams errors, inability to finish drives & settling for FGs).

edit: Based on the 1st half of the 49ers game, I'd expect us to win the superbowl... ๐Ÿ™‚
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

The Packers have one big advantage....

They have a better QB than any of the teams they play from now until the end of the season.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



Damn right. :thumbright:
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
What a difference a week makes. Now people are talking about running the table? That would put us at 12-4. Even in my wildest transports of preseason optimism, I never predicted better than 11-5, and I was pretty sure it would be 10-6, which is what I still think.

On the other hand, neither the Ravens nor the Steelers, whom almost everyone marked up as sure losses before the season (I had us splitting them) have looked all that intimidating this year, so anyone who says they can't see us beating them is off base, in my opinion.

It's not actually the quality or lack thereof of any of our opponents that concerns me. It's our team's own inconsistency and it's disconcerting tendency not to get beat but to beat itself.

Of course there are some downsides of the Packers making a playoff run. Everyone who has been clamoring for large-scale overhauls of the team will be largely disappointed, I'm guessing. I think the 2010 opening day Packers roster will look eerily similar to the 2009 opening day roster.
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
14 years ago


Of course there are some downsides of the Packers making a playoff run. Everyone who has been clamoring for large-scale overhauls of the team will be largely disappointed, I'm guessing. I think the 2010 opening day Packers roster will look eerily similar to the 2009 opening day roster.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



It's still a significant upgrade if Alan Barbre isn't at right tackle. :icon_smile:
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago

What a difference a week makes. Now people are talking about running the table? That would put us at 12-4. Even in my wildest transports of preseason optimism, I never predicted better than 11-5, and I was pretty sure it would be 10-6, which is what I still think.

On the other hand, neither the Ravens nor the Steelers, whom almost everyone marked up as sure losses before the season (I had us splitting them) have looked all that intimidating this year, so anyone who says they can't see us beating them is off base, in my opinion.

It's not actually the quality or lack thereof of any of our opponents that concerns me. It's our team's own inconsistency and it's disconcerting tendency not to get beat but to beat itself.

Of course there are some downsides of the Packers making a playoff run. Everyone who has been clamoring for large-scale overhauls of the team will be largely disappointed, I'm guessing. I think the 2010 opening day Packers roster will look eerily similar to the 2009 opening day roster.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Well, I do think we'll make the Playoffs, beat our WC opponent, and eventually get blown out by either the Aints or the Queens. Realistically, I think we're a Playoff team but not quite elite just yet.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (10-May) : 1. this is true of all our linemen. 2. His run block is fine. 3. If all OL played like he has, we would win SB.
beast (10-May) : Meyers pass blocking is really good, his run blocking is really not.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : Packers have claimed DE Spencer Waege off of waivers from the 49ers and waived DT Rodney Mathews.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : And the OL protections seem to be good.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : I really don't know lol. I don't see him getting blown up.
Zero2Cool (9-May) : -3 buwahhhahaaha
Mucky Tundra (9-May) : 4th
Zero2Cool (9-May) : because he's 1st
Mucky Tundra (9-May) : Myers isn't even the 3rd best C on the roster atm
Martha Careful (9-May) : I am not sure I understand the Myers hate. He was consistently our third best lineman. RG and LT were worse.
beast (9-May) : Just saying I don't think moving Myers would help Myers.
beast (9-May) : Center is usually considered the easiest position physically if you can handle the snap stuff.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : Bust it is then
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Context. Sounds like Myers won't be cross-trained. C or bust.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : @BookOfEli_NFL Packers pass game coordinator, Jason Vrable said that Jayden Reed and Dontayvion Wicks shared a placed in Florida while train
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : For now...
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Packers go about evaluating their "best five," OL coach Luke Butkus makes on thing clear: "Josh Myers is our center."
beast (8-May) : Though I'm a bit surprised letting go of CBs, I thought we needed more not less
beast (8-May) : It was confusing with two DB Anthony Johnson anyways
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Packers actually had Ray Lewis on the phone.
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Packers wanted to draft Ray Lewis. Ravens stole him.
Martha Careful (6-May) : Happy 93rd Birthday to the Greatest Baseball Player of All-Time...Willie Mays
Zero2Cool (6-May) : Walter Stanely's son
buckeyepackfan (6-May) : and released CB Anthony Johnson and DL Deandre Johnson and waived/injured WR Thyrick Pitts (thigh-rick).
buckeyepackfan (6-May) : The Green Bay Packers have signed WR Julian Hicks, OL Lecitus Smith (luh-SEET-us) and WR Dimitri Stanley
Zero2Cool (6-May) : Petty, but it's annoying me how the NFL is making the schedule release an event.
Mucky Tundra (4-May) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on how he tore his pec: โ€œGot in a fight with the bench press. I lost.โ€
Zero2Cool (3-May) : Jordan Love CAN sign an extension as of today. Might tak weeks/months though
TheKanataThrilla (3-May) : Packers decline 5th year option for Stokes
Mucky Tundra (3-May) : @ProFootballTalk Jaylen Warren: Steelers' special teams coach has discussed Justin Fields returning kicks.
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Season officially ending tonight for Bucks ... sad face
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Giannis Antetokounmpo is listed as out for tonight's game.
dfosterf (2-May) : Surprisingly low initially is my guess cap wise, but gonna pay the piper after that
dfosterf (2-May) : The number on Love is going to be brutal.
Zero2Cool (2-May) : May 3rd. Extension day for Jordan Love. (soonest)
Zero2Cool (1-May) : USFL MVP QB Alex McGough moved to WR. So that's why no WR drafted!
earthquake (1-May) : Packers draft starters at safety ever few years. Collins, Clinton-Dix, Savage
beast (1-May) : Why can't the rookies be a day 1 starter? Especially when we grabbed 3 of them at the position
dfosterf (1-May) : Not going to be shocked if Gilmore goes to the Lions.
dfosterf (1-May) : I hear you dhazer, but my guess would be Gilmore Colts and Howard Vikings from what little has been reported.
Mucky Tundra (30-Apr) : S learn from McKinney who learns from Hafley who learns from the fans. Guaranteed Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : could*
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Safeties should learn from Xavier.
dhazer (29-Apr) : And what about grabbing a Gilmore or Howard at CB ? Those are all Free Agents left
dhazer (29-Apr) : out of curiosity do they try and sign Simmons or Hyde to let these young safeties learn from, they can't be day 1 starters.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : I miss having Sam Shields.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Not that he's making excuses, just pointing it out
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : That's for dang sure. Make our erratic kicker have no excuse!
packerfanoutwest (28-Apr) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

7-May / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

7-May / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / beast

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

5-May / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

Headlines
Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.