obi1
15 years ago
Will somebody please define the difference between not playing to lose and playing to win?
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Will somebody please define the difference between not playing to lose and playing to win?

"obi1" wrote:



Playing to win would be goin for the juggler, the knockout punch. Taking a risk by throwing one deep a time or two trying to catch the team off guard.

Playing not to lose, is not taking those chances cuz they could be intercepted or what not and just doing safe run plays to eat clock.


I could go more in depth, but I'm tired.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago

Oh....and again Zombie....you are right. WAY too conservative on the play calling. Mike McCarthy looks like he;s calling plays not to lose.......not calling them to WIN.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




That is very true. It's pretty annoying too.

"Cheesey" wrote:





Maybe one of you would care to explain to me exactly why you are criticizing McCarthy's play calling given the fact that often times the QB has a run/pass option that he must decide on at the line of scrimiage based on the look the D is giving him.

Let's face it, no doubt Rodgers has picked some bad options compared to Favre, who had 17 years of experience to see Defences vs Rodgers 3.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
bozz_2006
15 years ago
yeah, and the rest of the starters are a year older, have a year more experience, and need to pick up the slack a little bit for the kid.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
15 years ago
I can read what the defenses are doing. They are running toward our QB, our line isn't blocking them, and they sack him. :tongue:
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Greg C.
15 years ago

Will somebody please define the difference between not playing to lose and playing to win?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Playing to win would be goin for the juggler, the knockout punch. Taking a risk by throwing one deep a time or two trying to catch the team off guard.

Playing not to lose, is not taking those chances cuz they could be intercepted or what not and just doing safe run plays to eat clock.


I could go more in depth, but I'm tired.

"obi1" wrote:



What if they try to throw deep, but the QB gets sacked because one or two linemen can't hold their blocks? Then the fans complain that they should've run the ball or thrown a short pass.

These play-calling debates can go around and around forever. When the Packers lose (and even when they win, for that matter) fans will say one of two things:

1. The play-calling was too conservative.

2. They gave up on the running game too soon.

Sometimes the fans say both of those things at the same time. Sometimes there is some truth to the criticisms, but what it really comes down to is that the players have to win their battles. And they're not winning those battles enough, especially on the offensive line.
blank
Cheesey
15 years ago

Oh....and again Zombie....you are right. WAY too conservative on the play calling. Mike McCarthy looks like he;s calling plays not to lose.......not calling them to WIN.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:




That is very true. It's pretty annoying too.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:





Maybe one of you would care to explain to me exactly why you are criticizing McCarthy's play calling given the fact that often times the QB has a run/pass option that he must decide on at the line of scrimiage based on the look the D is giving him.

Let's face it, no doubt Rodgers has picked some bad options compared to Favre, who had 17 years of experience to see Defences vs Rodgers 3.

"Cheesey" wrote:


Well.......that may or may not be so. I don't know if Rodgers has that big of a choice in what he does on first down. If HE is the one calling running plays on 1st that don't work, you would THINK the coach would tell him to stop doing that, and go to a pass......you know.......after 3 quarters of it NOT working. If i was the coach, i'd try that.
But thats just me.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Will somebody please define the difference between not playing to lose and playing to win?

"Greg C." wrote:



Playing to win would be goin for the juggler, the knockout punch. Taking a risk by throwing one deep a time or two trying to catch the team off guard.

Playing not to lose, is not taking those chances cuz they could be intercepted or what not and just doing safe run plays to eat clock.


I could go more in depth, but I'm tired.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



What if they try to throw deep, but the QB gets sacked because one or two linemen can't hold their blocks? Then the fans complain that they should've run the ball or thrown a short pass.

These play-calling debates can go around and around forever. When the Packers lose (and even when they win, for that matter) fans will say one of two things:

1. The play-calling was too conservative.

2. They gave up on the running game too soon.

Sometimes the fans say both of those things at the same time. Sometimes there is some truth to the criticisms, but what it really comes down to is that the players have to win their battles. And they're not winning those battles enough, especially on the offensive line.

"obi1" wrote:




I understand how football works. I know if you don't have time to throw it deep, you can't. I also know that Aaron Rodgers can audible out of plays too. I'm not sure if he can audible to ANY play or a group of plays.

Shotgun gives you an extra second to throw it deep.
UserPostedImage
TOPackerFan
15 years ago
With the way our D is playing the run, I'm pretty concerned about that Atlanta game. I could see Turner going off for 200 yards we're playing so badly vs. the run.
Show me a good loser, I'll show you a loser - Vince
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

That is what I think we will be at..

"vikesrule" wrote:



Hey 93z, you know that I've always admired your prognostication abilities! ::wink:

93z nails it! 

"pack93z" wrote:



LOL... okay so I was a little off..

I always knew you were a packer fan at heart.. PackRules. :lol:
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (8h) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (14h) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (16h) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (16h) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (18h) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (18h) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (18h) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (19h) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (19h) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

13h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

28-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.