luigis
7 years ago
Ok this one is on me.
We all know Mike reads this forum every week and digests all the posts.
Remember the day we made a joke about Peppers playing TE and then he dropped a TD pass next week?

I (and others) called Mike a conservative coach last week, he took it seriously, he wasn't going to kneel, no way.Granted,it was kind of absurd but he did what he had to do.

Now if you want to criticize Mike consider what you write....
Luis
nerdmann
7 years ago

I doubt nerd was serious when he made that suggestion but I do think Mike McCarthy is conscious of those things at times. Certainly he is not going to call a pass to Adams in that case but I do believe that if a player is close to a significant mark Mike McCarthy will try to do what he can to get him there within reason. He won't put a player in jeopardy or risk a game or really try to rub it in but I do think he would make an effort to try to accommodate such things if he could and it wouldn't change his philosophy too much. The problem with passing yards is if the guy ain't open he ain't open and even if the call is to him and he's covered there is only so much the coach can do. One thing he wouldn't do is tell Aaron to throw it to Adams no matter what to get him his yards but I could very easily see him calling a few plays that would be intended for Adams if he knew the situation. That's all anyone could ask or expect.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



Put it this way, if Davante hadn't dropped about 20 passes this season, they might have tried a little harder to get him there. 😎
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

I was kinda wondering about that call as well but I wouldn't call Mike McCarthy stupid for making it. First of all, as Zero said, we have no idea why he did call it. Get a first down and Detroit never touches the ball again, I'd be willing to bet that is what he was thinking and he would be right. No chance for another 4th quarter comeback. They wouldn't have even needed a first down as three running plays would likely take an additional 10 seconds off the clock over three kneel downs.

I get what you are saying Barfan but IMO the only reason it was questionable is because of what did happen. 9 series out of 10 and probably more that's three runs into the line and go home.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I'm sure I would have commented on it regardless of the result. When I didn't see the Victory formation; I jumped up and startled those I was watching game with😂. We were all celebrating and it stopped; because we all knew we were a fumble away from having OT possible. Detroit could have got the ball with 1:25 left and a TO.

When I saw the ball go to Kerridge, I yelled KERRIDGE!?! Then when we saw Spriggs we just couldn't believe it. During the injury time out, every orifice of McCarthy's anatomy was discussed as being penetrated by everything from a "dull ice pick" to "Long Dong Schlong's cryogenically frozen cock" [I cant stop laughing about this one]. Relief hit the room when out of the TO, they lined up in V. Did you see the knee to Rodgers' head on the onside recovery? Onside kicks are concussion makers.

McCarthy had no plan; he just wasn't thinking. There is no excuse for this. Proof of this is by what he did next: 2X kneel down.

Now if he's going to kneel 2x to leave 26 seconds on the clock; why would he not kneel 3x to leave 7-8 seconds or less? If the goal is not to punt, cause there's some risk there; then why not run 2 more times to try for the first and not give ball back. With Detroit selling out on the run and our OL not anywhere near being a road grader, there is only a .0001% chance of getting the 1st running up the middle.
sschind
7 years ago

Put it this way, if Davante hadn't dropped about 20 passes this season, they might have tried a little harder to get him there. 😎

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Don't know if it was 20 but if he had caught a couple more they wouldn't have needed to try.

Nonstopdrivel
7 years ago
Davante Adams reminds me of James Jones with his penchant for dropping the ball that hits him on the fingertips, then later making up for it with a wildly improbable catch no one should have been able to make. Maybe it's a flaw in Rodgers' passing style, but I have to think it boils down to a problem with focus.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Don't know if it was 20 but if he had caught a couple more they wouldn't have needed to try.

Originally Posted by: sschind 


You are right, it was not 20, it was 5.

5 drops Davante Adams
2 drops Jordy Nelson and Jared Cook

Odell Beckham had 6,
Mike Evans had 7,
Michael Crabtree had 9,
Leveon Bell had 5,
TY Hilton had 6,
Julian Edelman had 5.


Source: Stats INC 
UserPostedImage
Porforis
7 years ago

Davante Adams reminds me of James Jones with his penchant for dropping the ball that hits him on the fingertips, then later making up for it with a wildly improbable catch no one should have been able to make. Maybe it's a flaw in Rodgers' passing style, but I have to think it boils down to a problem with focus.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I'd be perfectly cool with Adams turning into James Jones 2.0. I think he's got the talent to be more of a Greg Jennings but we'll see.

Although I do kind of get Adams vibes from Allison. Love seeing the young guys grow up!
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
My first guess is that giving the kid 1 carry kicked in some provision of his contract.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Porforis
7 years ago

My first guess is that giving the kid 1 carry kicked in some provision of his contract.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



That he gets no money if he gains negative yards? How shrewd, Ted! 😁
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Again, READING COMPREHENSION!

Maybe most coaches may have run X3 in Seattle [Read Herring!] But, the premise of the argument is that Mike is a genius and he knows better; HE DID NOT CALL THOSE SEATTLE RUNS!!! Please, listen or otherwise educate yourself: Mike trusts Aaron and there is a check to pass on every run play GB has!

If the issue is Kerridge's confidence, why put him in a situation that has 99.999% chance of failure?
And if he had a nice gain, so what, the game was over with 3x kneel.

The odds of a fumble were at least multiplied by 100; the odds of injury by thousands. And now we lost our #6 OLman and may have pupped a starter for 2017. Injuries occur; but to increase their odds is 100% unconscionable.

Uffda may not come back: after 6 2015 games he predicted GB going undefeated; at 4-6 didn't see us wining one; oh and one of my favorites Adams is too slow to be an effective WR. Guys like him make these crazy factless void of football acumen ramblings. If a few come true, they taught their unavailing genius; if not, they disappear in shame. And pop up again as...I dont know "Thorn-in-the-arse."

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Oh, so wrong. I thought a perfect season hinged on game at Denver. I said this before the season.

I did say 8-8 for this year was a dream. Aaron awoke from his coma and I'm bummed it'll take 10 years for a book to come out explaining why/how.

As to the topic, I agree. It is fun watching some not understanding nuance and trying to equate apples to oranges. Mike McCarthy is DiMM. I've always maintained I wanted more intelligence from the HC position.

Running horse and Kerridge was senseless. Watching it spun into we don't know what thinking went into that decision IS the point here. Idiotic doesn't begin to cover it.

I'm glad Coughlin is gone. Perhaps, Mike McCarthy has just enough to outlast his porn stached protege on Sunday.

Oh. It's after the season. It's why they call it the post-season. Can't wait to read about what a great season it was at the point we're eliminated. We were favored to win every game before the season. 10-6 is a dismal failure but we did beat 5 bad teams and one horrible road team so I understand the enthusiasm. Nothing changes.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (4h) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (9h) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (11h) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (13h) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (13h) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (14h) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (14h) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (14h) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.