Once again i will explain we were already in fg range but you can grasp for your straws all you want. I said it in chat last night that we were already in FG range but i said if we move the ball 2 yards people will say look Rodgers drove us into range.
Look at the Facts Longtime. If i wanted to put any blame on Rodgers i would be pointing out scoring a whooping 3 pts in the 2nd half but i'm not. I put all the blame on Mike McCarthy for not letting the kid loose.
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
Once again, you're WRONG.
52 yards against the wind is in range? Really? That's interesting. He's Mason Crosby, not Clark Kent.
dhazer, you're full of shit! I told YOU (and everyone in chat) that you would say that Rodgers didn't do shit if we won the game and if we lost you'd push it on him somehow. That if we won the game it wouldn't be a notch in Rodgers belt, rather it would be a notch in the PACKERS belt.
FACT, everyone with any sense of reason knows and understand the Packers woes do NOT start or end with Rodgers performance.
Wait, I know why it's Rodgers fault. He spread the ball to something like ten different receivers. What a FOOL! And what's this? He's tops in the league on third down? My god if he was any good we wouldn't ever HAVE a third down!
Anyone who wants to blame the Packers losses on Rodgers and not the whole Packers team is (in my opinion) completely pathetic trash who hasn't watched a single down of the season.
"dhazer" wrote: