Who do you think will be a sleeper for the Packers this year? This can be any1 we might draft or any1 currently on the team. I'm not asking who going to have the best numbers but who's really going to have a break out year and put up good ones. Last year I would of said Nick Collins if it were not for Aaron Rodgers. This year for some reason I'm going with TE Jermichael Finley. The Packers showed that they thought a lot of him by showboating him in the Det game. That also reminds of what they tried using him for in the Ten game when they called his number to make the play for Rodgers on 4th down. Who do you think will be a sleeper?

---

I am pretty confident in one:

[youtube]lCnJpjj5jHk[/youtube]

Yes I remember that play! I was jumping out of my seat. Great Choice!

---

Jones has Sterling Sharpe body type doesnt he?

Sleeper..


Its going to be

Harrell..He will be the sleeper..



Wait, your saying sleeper as in a surprise good player?

Hmmmmmmmmm...

Hawk..Even though he is suppose to be good being picked at #5 we all know he has not lived up to the potential.

This is the year for him and if he doesnt do it, he should be gone

There was a similar thread a few weeks ago:

http://packershome.com/index.php?name=ForumsPro&file=viewtopic&t=4122 

Anyway, I think it might be one of the RBs... Jackson or Lumpkin.

---

I have to ask you a technical question.

Question :. Why is it that the incredibly beautiful Australian AND New Zealand ladies were ALL OVER us as American military-type fellows...calling THEM (that would be ...?you?) "Macho-assholes" (that was the theme, I swear, amongst Marines and Sailors...imagination has to go wild, but I swear it to be true!)

?

You do not seem like an incredibly macho prick, but after meeting your ladies, both there and here, it only seems fair that they think of you that way...I think it's called a fairness doctrine or something...

I'm personally done once the accent is evident...

I like Jason Hunter. I really think he could breakout in this system. Maybe he's the guy that gives the Packers 7 to 8 sacks opposite of Aaron Kampman. Sounds like a lot to ask, but he's a great fit for Capers' scheme.

---

Hmm I thought I typed a reply but it's vanished... Anyway, I think it's somewhat like the whole "grass is greener" thing, except that the other grass is the immaculate buzzcut of a man in uniform.

I think it's a truth universally acknowledged that a man in possession of a military rank, must be in want of a foreign fling.

---