And that was in response to Zero doing the legwork to compare A-Rod vs Favre in the final minutes.

---

So, back to the important part of this thread.


The Packers were 0 - 8 in opportunities to ... hey wait. No, that's not true. We weren't within 8 points of taking the lead in the last four minutes of eight games. There was only four or six!

---

in my post i said do you know how many times his name is mentioned in this thread - i said nothing about the context in which you said "brett" or "favre".

unlike you, i have no need to have the last word. all i can say is have fun arguing with the air cuz the discussing part of this is over from my side.

OMFG

---

So, back to the important part of this thread.


The Packers were 0 - 8 in opportunities to ... hey wait. No, that's not true. We weren't within 8 points of taking the lead in the last four minutes of eight games. There was only four or six!

---

What games were we not within 8 points of with 4:00 or less?

---

lol, there was 8. I was thinking of something different. doh

---

I do that as well because they actually lost 2 games in which they had no chance winning in the last part of the game.

---

See i don't get why you guys are comparing rodger's and favre's comeback wins. Rodgers has played one season that isn't fair. You really should be comparing him to someone like matt ryan or joe flacco. I guarantee matt ryan has at most 2 comeback wins from the 4 minute mark, and im pretty sure they were elam field goals. I believe they were pretty long ones too. The differences are elam made his field goals crosby didn't. My point is how many comeback wins do you expect from a 1 year starter who's defense cant get a stop with the game on the line. And a kicker who cant make a field goal with the game on the line.

---

I applauded you for that post 🙂

---