14 years ago
No No NO!!


It is the VP of officiating that says the legue made an error!!
I do not care about the opinion of someabody named Siefert.

When Pereira makes a proclamation it is the NFL's official position.

The official opinion of the NFL is the final word anddoes not belong in a thread calling the penalty legitimate by someone in no official capacity!!!!!

blank
dfosterf
14 years ago

No No NO!!


It is the VP of officiating that says the legue made an error!!
I do not care about the opinion of someabody named Siefert.

When Pereira makes a proclamation it is the NFL's official position.

The official opinion of the NFL is the final word anddoes not belong in a thread calling the penalty legitimate by someone in no official capacity!!!!!

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:




UserPostedImage

That should have never been called 13 posts
That Seifert is a homer 10 posts
Agrees with Seifert 0 posts
Seifert is not a homer 2 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter 10 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter with a link to the fact that the NFL ruled on the matter 3 posts

I don't care we won posts 6
Dhazer/dfost/and Buckeye bs posts several


C'mon dfosterf!!

Why are you for the penalty on Al Harris????




dfost- page 2 :


The VP of NFL in charge of officiating has said:

(As he essentially shrugged his shoulders)

The call was incorrect. (Pack that, you fool Seifert)

The ref was 20 yards downfield when he made the call (With a straight face he used this as justification)

The import of changing the rule to make it less severe of a penalty (discussed
many times in competition committee, he said) would encourage DB's to "take advantage" of the reduced impact of a violation.

____________________________________________________________

I am even more angry about this than I was originally. Seifert and his bullshit is infuriating enough, but when I reflect on how much of a "game changing" and ridiculously poor call this was---we are talking about not only a failure to make a correct call on the WR being off the line of scrimmage...we are also talking about a "free play" for the offense, in addition to the penalty itself.

Our DB's are targeted by the opposition as players designated to "watch"--- by the officials. It all goes to our bump and run history, coupled with Al and to a lesser degree Charles having established a reputation as "muggers" in this league...Rightly or wrongly. The refs have memories, and do listen when opponents and/or coaches point shit out. Then you bring in the moron factor established by Ahmad Carrol, and the crap just descends to a reputation of thuggery by our defensive backfield.

That call disgusts me greatly. Seifert disgusts me even more greatly for having the chutzpah to look at that, start digging in his rulebook, and proclaiming it as legitimate...if that isn't some sad homerism, I don't know what is.

This in the same game where asswipe almost took off Rodgers head in a no-call. Enjoy your vacation, Urlacher.

That crew sucks ass. I'd like to know which crew it was. The NFL can take their explanation letter and go wipe a baby's ass with it, btw.

"dfosterf" wrote:

TheKanataThrilla
14 years ago
I find the automatic first down for illegal contact to be a frustrating rule and second on my list of changes after the overtime rule. This should be a reviewable call. If they can review too many players on the field penalties they should be able to review whether you hit someone outside of 5 yards. The only problem would be all the non-calls that occur and perhaps challenges will happen when flags are not thrown.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
CaliforniaCheez, you seriously need a lesson in written irony and sarcasm. lol. Also, please enclose future quotes from other websites in

tags, which can be done by typing them or using that handy-dandy little button with the talk bubble on it.

As for the better title of CaliforniaCheez's thread, dfosterf, you actually could have merged the original thread into this one, keeping CaliforniaCheez's title while maintaining the chronological order of posts. I've been known to do that a time or two. 😉


UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago

CaliforniaCheez, you seriously need a lesson in written irony and sarcasm. lol. Also, please enclose future quotes from other websites in

tags, which can be done by typing them or using that handy-dandy little button with the talk bubble on it.

As for the better title of CaliforniaCheez's thread, dfosterf, you actually could have merged the original thread into this one, keeping CaliforniaCheez's title while maintaining the chronological order of posts. I've been known to do that a time or two. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



LOL

Thought about it, but then said to myself...

"Self, just you watch...change the title and the original poster is going to start complaining..."
flep
14 years ago
We still taliking about this.

The poster who said that the penalties would be offset and the down replayed has got the rules wrong.

Once Hester lined up off the line leaving the tackle uncovered he cannot go downfield on a passsing play. The formation is illegal.

Once he went downfield he had committed a penalty as inelegible downfield, therefore Al Harris cannot commit a penalty against hester for illegal contact as Hester should not have been in that position for Harris to make the contact.
Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years
UserPostedImage


I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!
Pack93z
14 years ago

CaliforniaCheez, you seriously need a lesson in written irony and sarcasm. lol. Also, please enclose future quotes from other websites in

tags, which can be done by typing them or using that handy-dandy little button with the talk bubble on it.

As for the better title of CaliforniaCheez's thread, dfosterf, you actually could have merged the original thread into this one, keeping CaliforniaCheez's title while maintaining the chronological order of posts. I've been known to do that a time or two. ;)

"dfosterf" wrote:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



LOL

Thought about it, but then said to myself...

"Self, just you watch...change the title and the original poster is going to start complaining..."



I irony of the quote tags on this post is stuff legends are made of ( I am assuming on purpose).. I gotta go find some duct tape to reattach my ass.. :lol:

Sorry that is some funny poo right there.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
"That should have never been called 13 posts
That Seifert is a homer 10 posts
Agrees with Seifert 0 posts
Seifert is not a homer 2 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter 10 posts
The NFL VP rules on the matter with a link to the fact that the NFL ruled on the matter 3 posts

I don't care we won posts 6
Dhazer/dfost/and Buckeye bs posts several"
Use ignore button, it really works well!!!
:icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile:
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Tezzy
14 years ago
Has anyone contacted Seifert to get a retraction? LOL.
Maybe, somehow, through Seifert's ignorance he was attempting to bring a spotlight to the issue of these types of calls. Wait, I'm giving him too much credit.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
14 years ago

Has anyone contacted Seifert to get a retraction? LOL.
Maybe, somehow, through Seifert's ignorance he was attempting to bring a spotlight to the issue of these types of calls. Wait, I'm giving him too much credit.

"Tezzy" wrote:



The whole point is that this thread is about something written by a guy named Seifert. Note the title of the thread that the penalty was fully legitimate.

Now the Vice President of the NFL has publicly admitted that the official made a mistake. The NFL's official position is that it was not legit.

Certainly the truth of the matter should be brought out and not buried on page 4 of the thread saying Al Harris deserved the penalty!

Shouldn't truth triumph over error?

Why should this board's official position be that Al Harris deserved the penalty and the official NFL position is not recognized?
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (5h) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (10h) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (12h) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (12h) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (15h) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (15h) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (15h) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (15h) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (16h) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.