So you're assuming we'll give up 4 sacks against the Vikings? :)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Interesting that people are considering Spitz solely in terms of a C.


Why not at LG? Going back to the 2-3 games Spitz was at LG while Colledge was at LT, Spitz played damn good. I think during that span, the interior of the line gave up a handful of pressures. I think that interior even shutout the Williams' wall from registering a sack or pressure - which is phenomenal.

Colledge is OK at LG, at times good, but imo Spitz was at times dominant while at LG.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

I found this interesting, people say we give up so many sacks and thats why we can't run the ball and worry about Rodgers health. Here is some of the other qbs.


Rodgers 25 sacks
Cassell 24 sacks
Big Ben 20 sacks
Favre 18 sacks




so if you look he hasn't been hit alot more than other qbs

"dhazer" wrote: