Just like everyone expected some team to give up the world for Garoppolo and it didn't happen, I think these unproven understudies are far more valued by their teams and their fans than they are by the rest of the league.

Originally Posted by: sschind 

It's a QB driven league. Look what the Bares just gave up for... WHO!?

Hundley needs to work on his deep accuracy, but I like him very much as a prospect. Certainly better than any of the draftees in this class.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

I wonder if you would feel the same way if Hundley was the Bears backup instead of the Packers?

Every GM in the league is aware of Brett Hundley and knows he probably could have been had much cheaper than what the Bears, Chiefs, and Texans gave up to get their rookies. If any of those teams would have gone to Ted when they were up in the first round and said "you give us Brett and you can have this pick" Ted would have jumped on it and they would have saved the other picks they had to throw in. That means at least those three GMs Don't think Hundley is a better prospect and I'm thinking he would have probably bit if Cleveland would have offered the second round pick when the took Kizer as well.

I'm not saying you are wrong I'm just saying I don't think many other non packer fans agree with you. You might get one here or there who thinks he is a better prospect than any one of them but not all of them.

Originally Posted by: sschind 

Hundley hasn't shown enough yet. If he can stay healthy and light up the preseason, perhaps. Frankly, I didn't think he looked good in his limited regular season opportunities either. The talent is there, but will he put it together? Doubtful. Probably a career backup.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 

Just like everyone expected some team to give up the world for Garoppolo and it didn't happen, I think these unproven understudies are far more valued by their teams and their fans than they are by the rest of the league.

Originally Posted by: sschind 

Brett Hundley means more to the Packers than another team. That is why I say I wouldn't let him go for anything less than a early 2nd rounder. It's not that he's some world beater. It's that he's shown enough (to me) that he's better than Joe Callahan and if you're going to take our backup, you gotta give us something worthy in return. That's just my take on it, not sure how others feel.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

I generally agree with you, but at this point I'm not certain how many more games Hundley would win over Callahan. I think they would both struggle and the results would come down to the defense and running game either way. I think I've seen as much out of Callahan as Hundley. Obviously I don't have the benefit of seeing them practice, so I'm sure I'm wrong, but I'm not sold on Hundley yet. Hopefully this preseason changes my mind.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower