DoddPower
7 years ago

Opium poppy seeds defined as "drugs" by the federal government. Otherwise known as a natural plant.

Heroin...It's natural so it's gotta be okay just like 7water Hemlock, which is also natural. Gets old reading how people who just wanna get high preach how it being natural makes it innocuous. No one was put on this earth to get drunk or high but it's amazing how many spend their short time here chasing just that.

Get help Sam.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I'm OK with any plant being legal. Synthesized drugs can be different, perhaps, but I am still pretty uncertain that the government should be spending it's time on such things. Moreover, pot is not heroin. I can go to a weed shop and buy all I want legally. I don't. Getting high has nothing to do with this. I can also go and get piss drunk wasted legally in many places if I want, but I don't do that either (well, at least very very few places, and only where such behavior is acceptable and expected). Typical weak argument. This is more about one's philosophy on the role of government, priorities, and utilization of limited resources, not about the legality of a plant, or a mushroom. Or even the world's oldest profession.
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Or even the world's oldest profession.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Dude, what does prostitution have to do with smoking weed, bro?
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I'm OK with any plant being legal. Synthesized drugs can be different, perhaps, but I am still pretty uncertain that the government should be spending it's time on such things. Moreover, pot is not heroin. I can go to a weed shop and buy all I want legally. I don't. Getting high has nothing to do with this. I can also go and get piss drunk wasted legally in many places if I want, but I don't do that either (well, at least very very few places, and only where such behavior is acceptable and expected). Typical weak argument. This is more about one's philosophy on the role of government, priorities, and utilization of limited resources, not about the legality of a plant, or a mushroom. Or even the world's oldest profession.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Ironically, one of my strongest beliefs in life is Big Pharma is truly and literally Satan on this earth. The amount of people we have on legal and synthetic chemicals in this country is beyond crisis levels. Human beings are largely no longer human because their brains have been modified by the drugs they're put on, legally dispensed. Those who dispense these legal synthetic chemicals should be in jail for stealing from people the essence of being human. It's something to cry, fight, rally to change. Our world has lost itself due to things synthesized in some lab. People just don't see it.

However, as much of a homeopath as I am, nobody was put here to be drug controlled natural or unnatural just like u weren't sent here to ingest hemlock.

Deal with life in all it's ugliness instead of escaping through drugs and alcohol. I don't believe NFL players mostly smoke weed for pain. It's done for pleasure.

I think cannabis should have it's pain properties isolated and put in pill form. Ironic, that I'm for this kind of synthesis but... I've always contended that dopers have driven this legalization crusade under the guise of false pretenses. Put the pain relief in a pot pill and tell the dopers they can't get high from smoking. The legalization movement would die if people knew they couldn't smoke to get high. I'd just laugh thinking those dopers cried about how it was good for pain. Great. Here's your pot pain pill. You don't get to smoke it. Those dopers would revolt because it has always been about getting high. I will remain strongly against legalization because it's premise is a lie.

I should have noted that tax revenue is another cry of the dopers. Yup. Put it in an OTC pain pill and you'll get 10x the tax revenue generated, but, again, it's never been about pain management or tax revenue...The liars just wanna get high.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


steveishere
7 years ago

Ironically, one of my strongest beliefs in life is Big Pharma is truly and literally Satan on this earth. The amount of people we have on legal and synthetic chemicals in this country is beyond crisis levels. Human beings are largely no longer human because their brains have been modified by the drugs they're put on, legally dispensed. Those who dispense these legal synthetic chemicals should be in jail for stealing from people the essence of being human. It's something to cry, fight, rally to change. Our world has lost itself due to things synthesized in some lab. People just don't see it.

However, as much of a homeopath as I am, nobody was put here to be drug controlled natural or unnatural just like u weren't sent here to ingest hemlock.

Deal with life in all it's ugliness instead of escaping through drugs and alcohol. I don't believe NFL players mostly smoke weed for pain. It's done for pleasure.

I think cannabis should have it's pain properties isolated and put in pill form. Ironic, that I'm for this kind of synthesis but... I've always contended that dopers have driven this legalization crusade under the guise of false pretenses. Put the pain relief in a pot pill and tell the dopers they can't get high from smoking. The legalization movement would die if people knew they couldn't smoke to get high. I'd just laugh thinking those dopers cried about how it was good for pain. Great. Here's your pot pain pill. You don't get to smoke it. Those dopers would revolt because it has always been about getting high. I will remain strongly against legalization because it's premise is a lie.

I should have noted that tax revenue is another cry of the dopers. Yup. Put it in an OTC pain pill and you'll get 10x the tax revenue generated, but, again, it's never been about pain management or tax revenue...The liars just wanna get high.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Who cares though? Pretty much everything people want is driven by pleasure. People don't put seasoning on their food because they need it but because the taste gives them pleasure. If someone wants to put garlic salt in their fruit loops I don't give a shit even though that sounds disgusting to me. If someone wants to smoke a joint in their house because it makes them happy who cares. I enjoy a glass of bourbon here and there but I don't really feel like it's "helping me deal with the ugliness of life" or anything like that nevertheless I still find it pleasureable, same with beer or wine. It would be pretty annoying if someone tried to stop me from doing that just because they view my reasons differently.
nerdmann
7 years ago
Shields may very well have been a first round pick if he hadn't been busted with weed a week before the draft. That's how we got him as an UDFA.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
7 years ago

WHAT?!? 😕
You think police would turn a blind eye to a bust?
You must be smoking some very strong stuff!

[list=1]Only time I've heard the Police turn a blind eye is (sometimes) when

  • they think it was an honest and simple mistake
  • when the paperwork they'll have to do is worse than the offense
  • no government body is willing to pay for the person to be in jail
  • when that person is fairly politically connected[/list]

    Originally Posted by: beast 


  • Rumor has it he did just receive a suspicious looking package from Colorado...I'm just sayin.
    uffda udfa
    7 years ago

    Who cares though? Pretty much everything people want is driven by pleasure. People don't put seasoning on their food because they need it but because the taste gives them pleasure. If someone wants to put garlic salt in their fruit loops I don't give a shit even though that sounds disgusting to me. If someone wants to smoke a joint in their house because it makes them happy who cares. I enjoy a glass of bourbon here and there but I don't really feel like it's "helping me deal with the ugliness of life" or anything like that nevertheless I still find it pleasureable, same with beer or wine. It would be pretty annoying if someone tried to stop me from doing that just because they view my reasons differently.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    I understand what you're saying but garlic on cereal doesn't impair judgment. Getting high and drunk does. Over 50℅ of crime is committed due to the impact of drugs.

    People enjoy smoking cigs or cigars but that behavior impacts me so it's rightfully banned in public places. Your right for pleasure ends where it infringes on my rights. Having a public high on marijuana is a baffling thing to try and enable.

    People love cocaine, heroin, meth. .. just let them do it because it's pleasurable? No.

    I'm fine with people who want to use alcohol in very moderate amounts. More than that is disgraceful IMO. U R not here to be high or drunk...Murder. Steal. Etc. I don't care who enjoys it.

    Drunks wanna drink...Dopers wanna get high...And kids wanna eat junk food all day.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    uffda udfa
    7 years ago

    Shields may very well have been a first round pick if he hadn't been busted with weed a week before the draft. That's how we got him as an UDFA.

    Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



    Joe Whitt is the one who said Sam could've been a 1st rounder IF he'd been a DB longer at Miami.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    steveishere
    7 years ago

    I understand what you're saying but garlic on cereal doesn't impair judgment. Getting high and drunk does. Over 50℅ of crime is committed due to the impact of drugs.

    People enjoy smoking cigs or cigars but that behavior impacts me so it's rightfully banned in public places. Your right for pleasure ends where it infringes on my rights. Having a public high on marijuana is a baffling thing to try and enable.

    People love cocaine, heroin, meth. .. just let them do it because it's pleasurable? No.

    I'm fine with people who want to use alcohol in very moderate amounts. More than that is disgraceful IMO. U R not here to be high or drunk...Murder. Steal. Etc. I don't care who enjoys it.

    Drunks wanna drink...Dopers wanna get high...And kids wanna eat junk food all day.

    Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



    I'm not sure our laws though have really kept people who want to do those things from doing them. It's mostly just adding another layer of destruction to their lives while adding money and power to nasty cartels and dealers.
    uffda udfa
    7 years ago

    I'm not sure our laws though have really kept people who want to do those things from doing them. It's mostly just adding another layer of destruction to their lives while adding money and power to nasty cartels and dealers.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    You're right. They haven't. This is the kind of argument that grates me to no end.

    People still commit murder although it's not legal. Those who want to murder are going to murder. Based on this logically bereft argument that drugs should be legal because people are still going to do them should we then legalize murder? The fact that we have a morally bankrupt society that wants to go through life high doesn't mean it should be enabled. I don't want to deal with drunk and high people out wandering the streets. We have public intoxication laws to protect from that.

    Personally, I'll never understand what drives a person to want to get drunk or high. Life might suck but deal with it. I never meant to imply having a glass of bourbon meant you weren't. We all know the difference between someone who drinks to get buzzed or drunk vs. someone who just enjoys it. I would argue that if you took the buzz angle away from alcohol close to 100% would stop consuming it. Non alcoholic beverages only sell to recovering alcoholics and those who don't drink. Those who drink are seeking some form of mood alteration and that fits with escaping from life's ugliness.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (2h) : Flag?
    Martha Careful (2h) : Sag?
    Nonstopdrivel (2h) : It rhymes with "bag."
    beast (18h) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
    Nonstopdrivel (18h) : Not THAT f-word.
    Zero2Cool (18h) : fuck
    beast (19h) : 49ers are Cap Tight
    beast (19h) : Fuck
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
    TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Love you NSD
    Nonstopdrivel (20h) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
    Nonstopdrivel (20h) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
    TheKanataThrilla (20h) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
    TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
    Zero2Cool (20h) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : @DMRussini
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
    buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
    dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
    beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
    Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
    Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
    wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
    Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
    Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
    Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
    Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
    beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
    beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
    beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
    beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
    Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
    beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
    dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
    beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
    dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
    dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
    dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

    22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

    19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.