Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages<12

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
DakotaT  
#41 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 12:55:58 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Who the fuck is using the Vikings as an example on HOW TO build a winner? In my post briefly explaining a top level core structure I did not mention the Vikings.



Page 1.
Zero2Cool  
#42 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 1:06:19 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Page 1.

Wow, that is helpful. Good work! You really proved your point there. Holy tooters do I see all of those posts saying the Vikings are an example on how to build a winner!! I did not see anyone say what the Vikings SHOULD do to build a winner. No sir, that was not said at all!

You are super observant!


Can you tell I'm getting tired of this ignorant bullshit??
Formo  
#43 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 2:18:19 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post

Building a winner starts with the GM putting in place the right guy at Quarterback. That is step 1 and the Vikings have never learned that. It is incredible the amount of wasted talent that has gone through that franchise because they didn't have the great player at the number 1 position.

Packer fans should consider themselves the luckiest fvckers on the planet.


I agree with both paragraphs.

I've been ok with the Chilly regime because he helped bring a lot of talent to the franchise, most of whom Vikings fan still enjoy. But one of his mistakes was NOT getting the QB spot taken care of ASAP. T-Jack could be a good enough excuse except for the fact that he was drafted in the worst possible way and Chilly stuck with him far too long. Most of us Viking fans are hoping that Ponder will be a solid career QB for us.
zombieslayer  
#44 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 2:57:52 PM(UTC)
Vikings aren't such a bad model. Their year was 2009. They had the 2nd best team in the NFL. The Saints were the best team by a field goal in OT. And Formo agrees with me on this, but I think had Henderson not been injured, they beat the Saints in that game. Both the Saints and the Vikings were better than the Colts that year.

Now the problem with that model is obvious. They didn't have the depth that we did. Injuries to their DBs and OL killed them and their DL which was once a wall got old.

DakotaT is right - the first piece should always be the QB and you build a team around that first piece.

Ted Thompson is fully aware that Aaron Rodgers is his bread and butter. Check his drafts. Last two seasons, our first round picks have been OTs to protect our investment. Every season we draft a WR to give him weapons.

I can tell you right now what our 2012 draft will look like. In the first two rounds, an OL will be drafted. We'll also pick up yet another WR. In the 4th through 7th rounds, we'll take another OL. Everything else will be depth unless Ted Thompson can find a steal.
macbob  
#45 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 3:18:05 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Okay, wow moving posts is a biotch. This is my thinking of how to build a successful NFL team.

Owner - priority one should be winning and putting a winning product on the field

General Manager - cares not about fans opinions only about acquiring the best talent. must not be afraid to make a big move to put team over the top.

Head Coach - teacher first, coach second.
Offensive Coordinator - teacher first, coach second.
Defensive Coordinator - teacher first, coach second.
Special Teams - not named Shawn Slocum


Solid scouting staff for college talent, keep logs on files until the player hits 32'ish.
Only overspend in free agency/trade if it is for a player whom will put your team "over the top"
Get rid of players a year EARLY rather than a year LATE


If you remove economics from decisions such as hiring a coach because he has a big name, or a player cuz of their name, etc ... I think this is the foundation most teams TRY to emulate, but fail.


Of course this is just my own BRIEF opinion.





Z2C-I'd add a few more (lessons learned from the Mike Sherman era):

1) Have a separate GM & HC. GM duties can distract from HC duties during regular season. Best to split those two than combine them into one.

2) Trade down in the draft more than you trade up in the draft. You can get screwed up by continually trading up in the draft and ending with fewer draft picks as a result--you're OK as long as you hit those picks (BJ Sanders) AND you don't have injuries, because you lose the depth behind your starters when you're doing that. Only trade up after you've stocked the team with sufficient depth at most/all positions (such as trading up to get CM3).

Methodikal  
#46 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 4:02:21 PM(UTC)
Do the opposite of the Vikings = winner.
Rockmolder  
#47 Posted : Sunday, October 16, 2011 7:04:53 AM(UTC)
Methodikal said: Go to Quoted Post
Do the opposite of the Vikings = winner.


That'd actually make you the Buccaneers or Bengals. Suck of a the greater portion of your history, have an amazing season or 4 and win/nearly win a SB and then slide back into mediocrity.

That might actually be easier than being a Vikes fan, since those purple bastards get your hope up every year only to fall flat on their face.

That said, trading AP and Jared Allen might be a somewhat ok idea from a performance if your truly believe that you're completely rebuilding. If you believe that you're not going to win in the next five years, you might as well fetch as much for those players now that you still can and get building through the draft.

That said, there's one huge point that everyone seems to be overlooking here...

Every NFL team is run with one thing in mind. Profit. Players like Peterson and Allen are why, next to the real fans who stick to their team no matter what, the Vikings are still selling tickets, jerseys etc. It'd be very unwise to just trade away your moneycows at this point.

Maybe they would be better off in 3 years if they traded both of them... Or maybe they'll be stuck with a team full of no-name players. It's a pretty big gamble.
Zero2Cool  
#48 Posted : Sunday, October 16, 2011 7:38:36 AM(UTC)
Trading those two only works if you are able to draft talent. If you're not able to, you should be fired anyway.
Zero2Cool  
#49 Posted : Monday, October 17, 2011 9:09:20 AM(UTC)
Brandon Lloyd was traded to the St. Louis Rams. Kind off seeing a team get rid of one of its best players. Although, it's a good move for both Brandon Lloyd and the Broncos. He was not going to resign with Denver, especially with Tim Tebow at QB. Brandon is a good deep threat WR and Tebow does not have the arm strength to get it deep.
DoddPower  
#50 Posted : Monday, October 17, 2011 9:49:55 AM(UTC)
Rockmolder said: Go to Quoted Post
That'd actually make you the Buccaneers or Bengals. Suck of a the greater portion of your history, have an amazing season or 4 and win/nearly win a SB and then slide back into mediocrity.

That might actually be easier than being a Vikes fan, since those purple bastards get your hope up every year only to fall flat on their face.

That said, trading AP and Jared Allen might be a somewhat ok idea from a performance if your truly believe that you're completely rebuilding. If you believe that you're not going to win in the next five years, you might as well fetch as much for those players now that you still can and get building through the draft.

That said, there's one huge point that everyone seems to be overlooking here...

Every NFL team is run with one thing in mind. Profit. Players like Peterson and Allen are why, next to the real fans who stick to their team no matter what, the Vikings are still selling tickets, jerseys etc. It'd be very unwise to just trade away your moneycows at this point.

Maybe they would be better off in 3 years if they traded both of them... Or maybe they'll be stuck with a team full of no-name players. It's a pretty big gamble.


I understand your point, but I would have to imagine they would get some big names in the draft, especially with several 1sts. Fans catch on to big time rookies quickly. Tebow was a leading Jersey selling not too long ago, although to be fair not many college players have careers like him. But still, hopefully my point came across.

With that being said, I could see trading JA, but not AP. It just seems too unlikely, unless they can somehow acquire Luck.
Dexter_Sinister  
#51 Posted : Monday, October 17, 2011 7:14:01 PM(UTC)
The Walker trade is still a shining example of being opposite of the Vikings efforts to build a championship team.

First it is the number of championships that it produced.

Second is that Walker was a pro bowl running back. The Cowboys traded him for a chance to build a great D and O-line. Then they put a plodding RB who would run into the line and fall down behind them.

The formula for success is, top 5 passing game, top 5 passing D and about a 16th ranked running game. That is what wins the super bowl on average.

Since there is not a direct correlation to RB rank and post season success, having a great running back doesn't increase the odds of winning a post season game.

Right now, regardless of who the QB is, the O-line in Minnesota is not going to win the team anything.
Zero2Cool  
#52 Posted : Monday, October 17, 2011 7:38:21 PM(UTC)
I think the Steve Walsh trade helped as well. That was another two 1st rounders and I believe a 3rd rounder.
Zero2Cool  
#53 Posted : Monday, October 24, 2011 6:44:16 AM(UTC)
San Francisco traded quarterback Tom Owen, two first-round picks in 1976, and first- and second-round picks in 1977 for Jim Plunkett

San Francisco dealt second- and third-round picks in 1978, first- and fourth-round picks in 1979, and a second-round pick in 1980 for O.J. Simpson.


It's crazy to think how many teams have had these lopsided trades.
Zero2Cool  
#54 Posted : Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:02:39 AM(UTC)
Methodikal said: Go to Quoted Post
Do the opposite of the Vikings = winner.


best post of thread
dfosterf  
#55 Posted : Friday, August 31, 2012 3:10:42 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
How to build an NFL winner and we're using the Vikings as a model? I know some of you miss Nick the dumbass, but bringing VR back is not worth using the worst case scenario oxymoron possible.

Building a winner starts with the GM putting in place the right guy at Quarterback. That is step 1 and the Vikings have never learned that. It is incredible the amount of wasted talent that has gone through that franchise because they didn't have the great player at the number 1 position.

Packer fans should consider themselves the luckiest fvckers on the planet.


Just cleaning house. Nick is an asshole, not a dumbass, by any stretch of the imagination. Tongue

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Mike Mayock says this is one of the best defensive drafts he's ever seen, especially at DE, CB & S.
Smokey (7h) : Yellow as the background color for such blocks as Lambeau Field & Lombardi Ave & Recent Topics & Fan Shout .
Zero2Cool (7h) : and thanks FP88 ... glad you enjoy it. :-)
Zero2Cool (7h) : Finally, got my avatar back! Weird!
Zero2Cool (10h) : FP88, :-) its okay. Smokey, yellow where?
FLORIDA PACKER88 (11h) : Didnt realize how much I needed this site in my life until it wasn't available haha! Looks great Zero!
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Click the Clear link to force new files to load for style.
Smokey (26-Feb) : A little yellow for contrast maybe ?
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Thanks. Took about 16-20 hours.
wpr (26-Feb) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Feb / Announcements / dhazer

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines