Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

Updated: May 10, 2010, 5:18 PM ET
Arrest order issued for Wade's wife 

Associated Press

CHICAGO -- A judge in Chicago has ordered sheriff's deputies to take basketball star Dwyane Wade's wife into custody after she failed to show up for a divorce hearing.

Cook County Circuit Judge Marya Nega said Monday that Siohvaughn Wade will have to post $10,000 bond to be released. The sheriff's department couldn't immediately say when the order would be carried out.

Lawyer James Pritikin had planned to ask Monday that Dwyane Wade be given physical custody of their two children.

Nega was clearly angry at what she called a pattern of behavior by Siohvaughn Wade throughout her contentious divorce proceedings from the Miami Heat star.

Nega said whenever it appears the case isn't going to go Siohvaughn Wade's way, her telephone is suddenly turned off.


UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
Gee...and here I thought you had discovered a wife I've never had.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Formo
15 years ago
lol Wade.. Don't worry.. I knew instantly it wasn't you. =)

As far as this 'wife' goes.. Why does the court give mothers so much leverage in their rulings?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DakotaT
15 years ago
Because they are the natural caregiver for child raising. What courts do a very poor job with is recognizing outstanding fathers and punishing poor mothers. Then when you have a poor mother and father, the court is really up shit creek because neither should get the kid(s).
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
15 years ago
nothing.
TheEngineer
15 years ago
Siohvaughn!?

What's wrong with good ole Siobhan?
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

lol Wade.. Don't worry.. I knew instantly it wasn't you. =)

As far as this 'wife' goes.. Why does the court give mothers so much leverage in their rulings?

"Formo" wrote:

With this being a extreme sensitive subject for myself personally, I'll keep my comments to a minimum. Gender bias comes from the stereo type that men are bad parents. Old people tend not to understand times change and that a small quantity of poor fathers should not negate the good fathers.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Your case notwithstanding, 4PackGirl, it is a fact that the overwhelming majority of courts are skewed in favor of the mother. In many jurisdictions, they are required to do so. The laws of countries like Australia are particularly onerous. Domestic assault, for example, is defined as a man's-only crime in that country; a man cannot be charged with domestic violence. Moreover, the police are obligated by law to take the word of the woman against the man, no matter how the situation might appear to them.

That's not gender equality. That's preferential treatment.

I personally believe that the average single father is a better parent than the average single mother. After all, it's not a mother the typical convict is missing -- it's a father.

In your case, 4PackGirl, and others like yours, I can understand why the courts are so reluctant to take your word against the father's. By your own admission, you knew "what he was" when you married him. You stayed with him for a number of years -- you even had more than one child with him. Now you want the court to believe he is suddenly a greater threat and should be deprived of his rights? I applaud the courts for their caution. This isn't the 1980s anymore, when children were stripped from their parents on the slightest provocation. I'm glad that reign of terror is ended.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Another thing: The research unequivocally shows that even in physically and sexually abusive situations, children who are allowed to stay with their parents grow up better adjusted and psychologically/emotionally healthier than those put in foster care. As much as it may jar on you to see your children with their father, it's almost certainly in the children's best interest. No matter how flawed an individual he may be, they still love him, and he probably loves them.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
15 years ago
really, non? i 'knew what he was' when i married him? yes i did. however, when someone goes through inpatient treatment & is 'sober' for 12 years of the 15 you're with him, you tend to think having children with them is probably gonna be ok. so it's now my fault because he decided one night that he'd go ahead & drink again? and it's MY fault that he got the DUI's & put his children i harms way by driving them around on a suspended license? and it's my fault that he has missed MANY visitations with them because he's a selfish alcoholic? and it's my fault that he refuses to pay for half of their medical/dental/eye costs? and it's my fault that he has chosen his own needs over those of his children? and it's my fault that he lies to his kids? and it's my fault that i didn't have a fuckin crystal ball that foretold the future? he hadn't touched a drop in 7 years before i had the boys with him. but yeah - it's my fault. makes sense.

i had TWINS with him - after 10 years of infertility!! don't you dare claim to know every aspect of my situation. i've discussed it on here but not in complete detail. i don't expect the court to take MY word over HIS - it's not about him & me - it's about the children & their safety. when i divorced him, he wasn't drinking!!! that's NOT why i divorced him. once he started drinking again, you bet your sweet ass i was very concerned. he is a VERY brittle diabetic who has an insulin pump. his doc has told him over & over NOT to drink. he's gone into several diabetic coma's while DRIVING!! then his license is suspended & he STILL drove the boys around. so excuse the hell outta me for wanting to protect them from what could potentially be a deadly situation. oh wait but it's my fault.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (10h) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.