IronMan
15 years ago

I know people like to crack against the defense, but I still don't think they cost us a game last year.

"nerdmann" wrote:

The Pittsburgh game and the playoff game.

"IronMan" wrote:




The OFFENSE turned the ball over twice in the first three plays in the playoffs. In the Red Zone. Against the best Red Zone team in the league.
The OFFENSE also lost the game in overtime.
Not saying the defense couldn't be better. I just don't pin any of this season's losses on the defense. Unlike the previous season.

"nerdmann" wrote:


The offense also scored 36, and 45 points in those games. You're kidding right?
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
When your offense scores more than 20, you should win. If you don't, it's because of poor defense more times than not. In our case the Special Teams also contributed to our futility.

The early turnovers in the playoff game hurt us, they did not bury us. Our offense is what kept us IN the game and got us to overtime.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
Rankings or Power Polls or what ever the given author wants to title his ramblings.. they are all completely and utterly useless as any real point of reference.

All they accomplish is drive talk around the the given writer... don't mean to sound crass on a Tuesday morning.. but it is all bullshit. Apparently King needs his column talked about this week and wants a mailbox full of e-mails to drive his Tuesday edition.

Normally King strives for better than a springtime ranking of the NFL.. disappointed. BTW.. Williams is our second or at worst third CB on the roster.... and King you wonder why I give your rankings the heave.

I like his 10 things better than this type of garbage..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

good points zero... the pack haven't really proven much the last 2 years, additionally, Grant and the cbs make me nervous. However, there is no denying this team has a ton of potential, so hopefully they live up to that!

"dhazer" wrote:



I hate the word potential after all what is it? To me its just someones opinion on how good a person should be. Potential = opinion so we have alot of opinions lol

"musccy" wrote:



One of my favorite lines from my college coach: "Potential means you haven't done it yet."
musccy
  • musccy
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

When your offense scores more than 20, you should win. If you don't, it's because of poor defense more times than not. In our case the Special Teams also contributed to our futility.

The early turnovers in the playoff game hurt us, they did not bury us. Our offense is what kept us IN the game and got us to overtime.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I agree with you and ironman, if you put up 45, you should expect to win. The defense made some great strides last year, but were exposed and disected by top level quarterbacks towards the end of last year. That's not something to dismiss under the rug.
Stevetarded
15 years ago

I know people like to crack against the defense, but I still don't think they cost us a game last year.

"nerdmann" wrote:

The Pittsburgh game and the playoff game.

"IronMan" wrote:




The OFFENSE turned the ball over twice in the first three plays in the playoffs. In the Red Zone. Against the best Red Zone team in the league.
The OFFENSE also lost the game in overtime.
Not saying the defense couldn't be better. I just don't pin any of this season's losses on the defense. Unlike the previous season.

"nerdmann" wrote:



Vs Pittsburgh the defense gave up 537 yards, 23 first downs, and a game winning drive while time expired, the offense scored 36 points and there were no turnovers. It doesn't get any more on the defense than that.
blank
Pack93z
15 years ago
The Pittsburgh and Cardinal game exposed a weakness that the Packers have.. which simply is we can't play zone defense effectively enough to save our asses.

Which forced us to stay with our physical brand of coverage with a couple of greenhorns at CB... now throw in some piss poor communication on the field from the QB of the defense at safety and the lack of someone grabbing hold to the leadership reins in the crunch.

Watch the stacks and motion Pittsburgh and Arizona threw at us.. they had short routes all over the place wide open.. which made Capers drop some of his blitz packages in favor of trying to shore up the quick hitting routes..

All this did was minimize the weak ass pressure we already got from ineffective interior blitzing and made our pass rush very predictable and thus ineffective.. which in turn allowed the opposition to sit on the deeper routes and torched another weakness in half of our safety coverage..

Part of that whole breakdown was some effective game planning from the opposition.. but much of it started to snowball with the fact that Capers, IMO, didn't trust our zone coverage at all (don't blame him) and kind of knotted up the variation that Capers could adjust to..

How to improve that:

> Become more effective in Zone Coverage.

> Get more effective blitzing from the interior backers to open up the packages in the pressure aspect.. the only effective blitz from the interior backers was the cross stunt when he sent both of them crashing.. other than that.. they got zero effectiveness when he sent them.

In the 3-4 you have to be able to get pressure from all 4 linebackers for the scheme really to take off.. we didn't get that.

> We need better communication from safeties (the QB of the Defense) prior to the offensive snap.. read it properly and make adjustments accordingly.. then communicate them effectively.. not the monkey humping the football routine that we seen late last season.. embarrassing to watch that level of confusion.. backups or not. Collins and Bigby were there.. it should be cleaner than that.

> We need the down three to provide some pass rushing push.. I understand that Capers had them sitting run first than pass rush to protect our interior backers (can't get off a run block) but our down three have to been able to get a push to at the very least reduce the depth of the pocket.

> Be a bit luckier in the injury department so we can minimize the drop in the level of play in our depth and reduce the responsibility load upon Collins, who has proven that he is a hell of a safety in play but inside overly effective in making defensive adjustments upon the field.. or Bigby whom over the course of the last two seasons has difficulty just staying on the field. Hell he gave up in the Cardinals game.

> Matthews needs to evolve his game to the next level where he can dial up different combination to rush the passer.. the guy goes all out every play.. he just needs to add to his arsenal of pass rushing techniques than beating them around the corner. KGB lived on the speed rush alone for a couple of years.. if Clay wants to better that.. he needs to become a more complete pass rusher.

> We need Jones/Obi/Poppinga/UDFA bloomer to become a more consistently effective pass rusher from that side.. personally I hold little hope for Poppinga.. but I have great hope and excitement for the other two.

> And lastly.. Dom has to trust his zone calls earlier in this year, year two of deployment of his defense so that we can dial up those calls when the opposing offenses game plan effectively for our pressure bump style of play with space and motion. I understand that zone isn't our strong suit, our guys are physical bump type players.. but we have to be able to at least be effective in zone when we have no choice but to drop into them.

There.. Pack93's thoughts upon the 2010 defensive remedies.. peck away. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
15 years ago

When your offense scores more than 20, you should win.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I had to look up recent SB history, just out of curiosity.

From 1998 to 2009, SB winner could have won the game by scoring 20 points 8 times. You have to go all the way back to 1978 (before kids like you were even born) to find a team who lost the SB who scored 30 points.

It's pretty safe to say that if your O scored 24 points, you should win the game. If you lose, the D is to blame.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
15 years ago

I don't like these rankings. It's nice that he's trying to do something different, but I just can't see it playing out like this at this point.

Minnesota at 13 is crazy. Even without Favre I think that they're better than that. They could get to the play-offs on their running game and defense, alone. Although he does make a good point about the O-line.

Seattle at 11? Even if this is a play-off simulation, rather than a power ranking, I'd go with the 49ers.

What have the Giants done to improve, all of a sudden? I'd take both Dallas and Philly over them right now.

Carolina at 8 seems like a stretch with that awful D-line. Without Peppers, their defense gets even more mediocre than it already was. I bet you can't name one playmaker on that defense.

Miami at 6 is a stretch. Henne hasn't done enough to show that he'll, somehow, become an elite QB all of a sudden. Both of their starting DE/OLBs from last year are gone and Koa Misi isn't going to be a force (in his first year).

And lastly, Green Bay at 1 is pretty crazy right now. The article itsself says it already, we don't have anyone opposite of Matthews, who's a little overrated, anyway. I hope that Brad Jones has bulked up and will show something, but I doubt that very much. The O-line still isn't great. Clifton will be on the ground at some points during the season and Bulaga will have to step in, who's a big unknown and is, I think, still more of a RT, anyway.

We'll see how it plays out, though. There's a few surprises every year and he's bound to have some right.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Good post. I'd have GB up there. Get that weird defense shored up and you guys are easily a scary team.

Minnesota's Oline was mediocre at best last season. But, in their defense, there was 2 new starters that year, too. Sullivan and Loadholt. Of all the individual groups on a football team, none is more effected by chemistry than the lines.. Especially offensive lines. I'm not saying Minny's oline is going to be better this year, but I think it's fair to expect it to be better. Bottom line (see what I did thar?), if that group of linemen get their issues shored up, Minnesota's running game could be vastly improved, even without Chester Taylor and with a rookie 3rd down back.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
15 years ago
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/05/18/mailbag/index.html 
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (24m) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (9h) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (19h) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (20h) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (20h) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
dfosterf (29-Jul) : 50 cent hookers? I'm moving to Green Bay. I thought it was just real estate that was more affordable there. 😂
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.