Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Missed Parent-Teachers Conferences Could Result in Jail Time for Parents
 
by Honey Berk
Oct 22nd 2010 1:12PM

There have been plenty of reports about parents being jailed when their kids miss school, but now parents also may be locked up for their own absences -- from parent-teacher conferences.

Michigan prosecutor Kim Worthy is pushing for a new law that would require parents to attend at least one conference per year or face three days of jail time, the Detroit News reports.

Though she has started presenting her plan at the city level, Worthy staffers tell the News she is trying for a statewide mandate. Either way, the proposed law would be the first of its kind in the country.

In responding to an accusation by "Good Morning America" anchor George Stephanopoulos that her plan sounds like "the nanny state on steroids," Worthy cites the fact that the government already regulates many issues involving children and their well-being.

"A lot of people say that we shouldn't legislate morality, but we already do," Worthy tells "Good Morning America." "We legislate for children specifically that they have to be in car seats. We legislate that parents have to send their children to school if they're 6 to 15 years old. And, here in Michigan, you can go to jail for up to 30 days ... if you don't send your children to school ... So, we legislate all kinds of things already when it comes to children."

The proposed law is but one facet of a comprehensive package her office has put together, and one that is strictly targeted to repeat offenders, Worthy tells "Good Morning America."

"It's not like you miss one and you go jail -- that's not it at all," she says. "You schedule it; you have up to three opportunities to schedule your conferences at your convenience -- night, afternoons and midnight for parents who work."

In addition, there are some exemptions to the plan: parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters, the News reports. There is also a plan for intervention services that would kick in before the mandate for jail time.

"We have to find any means necessary to get parents involved," Worthy told the Detroit City Council, the News reports. "We have to start talking about prevention ... Some children don't have a chance the day they are born."

Wayne County Commissioner Laura Cox tells the News she thinks Worthy's intentions are admirable, but that the prospect of jailing parents is "inappropriate on a lot of levels."

Kevin McNamara, another colleague, tells the newspaper he fears the law would become a "tattletale version of pin the tail on the bad parent."

And one Livonia Public Schools board member tells the News: "You can't legislate parental involvement. If the law forces parents to go, what will it do other than fill up a room with parents who don't want to be there?"

But Worthy counters these arguments by drawing a link between parental involvement and youth crime.

"... We're seeing students as young as 10, 11, 12, 13 committing the most violent crimes, and guess what we find out?" she tells "Good Morning America." "They're not in school, they don't have parental supervision and that parent has not been up to that school. And so, again, this is but one in a series of things that we want to try introduce that will go right to parental responsibilities. And, ultimately, if our children are in school and doing well, they are not out doing crimes."


UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago
STUPID.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
4PackGirl
14 years ago
don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.
Porforis
14 years ago
That's it, I'm moving to France. Just kidding.
longtimefan
14 years ago

don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



So all the parents that dont show up are on welfare? I think you know the answer to that...

Hope no one losses focus of the point of all this...

Get the parents involved..

exemptions to the plan:

parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters



I AGREE sending parents to jail is stupid..Your going to take them away from the kids, which in turn leads to NO involvment at all, the very thing your trying to put an end to..

There has to be a different way to get them involved..

I know myself growing up in the early 70's my mom was at EVERY conference as were most of my friends moms and for most part we all did good in school..and stayed out of trouble..

I do recall one of my friends that didnt have the mom or dad show, ended up into drugs, alcohol, and skipping school in the 8th and 9th grade..After 9th grade he was gone..Dont even know where he went..

Now not saying it was all because his mom never showed, but it is odd that she didnt show and he was in trouble a lot..
Pack93z
14 years ago
I don't know what is more pathetic in this situation.

The fact that they are trying to pass such a law or the fact that the need is so apparent that they feel the need for such a law.

Most can have a child, but not everyone is fit to be a parent.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
4PackGirl
14 years ago

don't know what the answer is to this but i'm pretty sure it's not jailing the so-called parents. if they cared about their kids, they'd have them in school. how about taking the kids away from the 'parents' thusly reducing the amount of welfare benefits they receive? i dunno.

"longtimefan" wrote:



So all the parents that dont show up are on welfare? I think you know the answer to that...

Hope no one losses focus of the point of all this...

Get the parents involved..

exemptions to the plan:

parents of children who are doing well in school, those who have health issues that render them unable to travel to school and those who are "actively engaged" with their child's teachers through e-mail, phone calls or letters

"4PackGirl" wrote:



I AGREE sending parents to jail is stupid..Your going to take them away from the kids, which in turn leads to NO involvment at all, the very thing your trying to put an end to..

There has to be a different way to get them involved..

I know myself growing up in the early 70's my mom was at EVERY conference as were most of my friends moms and for most part we all did good in school..and stayed out of trouble..

I do recall one of my friends that didnt have the mom or dad show, ended up into drugs, alcohol, and skipping school in the 8th and 9th grade..After 9th grade he was gone..Dont even know where he went..

Now not saying it was all because his mom never showed, but it is odd that she didnt show and he was in trouble a lot..



i put the whole welfare thing in there just to see the reaction. bad julie. but honestly, take something from the parents that is of value besides their freedom. money came to mind the quickest.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
It amazes me that Americans actually think attendance at parent-teacher conferences should be mandatory by law -- and that failure to attend should be subject to penalty.
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
14 years ago
glad to hear it rourke. as long as we disagree on a subject, i'm happy. 😃
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
That made me grin. +1 😃
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (7h) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (23h) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Around The NFL / isaiah

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / GoPack1984

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.