wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
for a team that only lost twice last year there were enough things going wrong on the defensive side of the ball to cause a lot of frustration. Sometimes it may have been Dom's doing. Sometimes it was the players letting the team down. Dom does get a little conservative sometimes but not always. When he came out with his psycho package a couple of years ago that was pretty innovative. But it is only going to work one or two weeks. OCs then have time to watch film and make adjustments.

I have a had time accepting the adage that some tout that it is ok to give up a LOT of yards if the other team doesn't score. I would rather have a defense that gives up 50 yards a game than one that gives up 400 yards. Shut down their offense and you are probably going to win the game. (Unless you fail on ST or give them a lot of turnovers.)
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

Bend but try not to break, but still break very often. Especially when it matters the most, i.e., 3rd downs/must stop plays.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



That depended on which quarter it was. They were much better in the first through third quarters. When they didn't have the average 18 point lead.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
beast
13 years ago

Dom Capers needs to step it up - That 3 man pass rush doesn't work-never has

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Maybe that's why he didn't use it?
Don't know if it was correct but someone on ESPN said the Packers brought extra guys in the pass rush 2nd most in the NFL only behind the Saints.

If he's a guru, he sucks at it.
He seems to always go very conservative when we are even a little bit ahead. Now I've been told we need to learn how to properly tackle. Where is the accountability as regards our Defensive Coordinator? I forget the actual ranking, but I know suckage when I see it, and his defense sucked.

Sucked Sucked Sucked.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



The accountability they're training them to properly tackle now...

There is VERY VERY VERY VERY little a coach can do when the guys up front aren't getting it done and you got not way to change it up. Other than Matthews and Bishop the front 7 got VERY VERY VERY little pressure even when he sent blitzes.

You can change things up and he seemed to try... but it still wasn't changing the fact that the guys up front weren't getting the job done.

Needed more healthy pass rush... Jenkins gone and NT Green didn't take care of himself during the lockout... killed the pass rush and Raji didn't seem able to do to much with out more help.

UserPostedImage
doddpower
13 years ago

Between Peprah playing for Collins

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



Peprah replaced Collins? Interesting. And here all this time I thought Burnett was the Packer's free safety after Collins went down.
Porforis
13 years ago
One other point when it comes to giing away a lot more points in the 4th quarter: Becoming more conservative is part of it, but so is the other team becoming more aggressive because they're running out of time, and the defense starting to get tired.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

No, our defense licked ass last year - and it was an abomination. I don't care how many picks we got. The only that stat that matters is getting off the field on 3rd down - and we couldn't defend 4 yards or 15. Our defense sucked.

And I think Gunny's take on Caper's accountability is completely appropriate.

Originally Posted by: Dakotat 



And that's okay for you to be completely wrong too. The sun will still rise.


The main issue with the Packers defense was tackling. Teams were going to get lots of passing yards no matter what, since the Packers lacked a pass rush and also the offense was putting up near historic numbers. When your team is down by a score and more, your offense abandons the running game and gets pass happy. You'd think that would make it EASIER to get a pass rush, but that just shows how inept the Packers pass rush was.

The yards given up don't bother me much. It's the crappy tackling that pisses me off and its not going to get better. I seen a clip of Jarrett Bush last night where he shoulder bumped someone out of bounds. Tackling needs to be done on every play, in my opinion, so it becomes a habit to tackle properly and to wrap up. Seeing that shoulder bump, I had to control the urge to Nolan Ryan my remote.


Oh, and yes, the three man rush is stupid.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
I think my problem with the 3 man rush is that it is too reactive. Indeed, I think that's my problem with the Packer D in general.

I think the Capers approach is more "read-and-react." Buddy Ryan's 4-6, or in earlier days, the Purple People Eaters or the Lombardi/Hanner/Bengston defense were more attack-and-make-the-other-guy-adjust.

Attack defenses depend on good, but disciplined tackling. Not on the killer highlight-film shot, but sound wrap-up-and-drive-through-the-guy tackling. It doesn't mean freelancing, it means "We're not afraid of you, we're coming through *here* and you have to stop us or you're dead."

Read-and-react depends above all on having more acceleration -- acceleration through the hole the offensive scheme reveals after snap, closing speed if you're in coverage. Speed that sees the hole one guy is leaving and getting there before the other guy closes it. Speed that sees where the guy in front of you is going and beating him there. If you are Nick Collins or Tramon (before injury) or Sir Chuck before last year, it works. And it is the kind of thing that can yield lots of INTS even when you don't have that acceleration edge, because by reading, you see the other guy's mistakes and can take advantage of them.

But if the other guy doesn't make a mistake, and something happens to lose that acceleration edge (aging for Woodson, injury for Collins and Williams, bad tackling technique, you get big plays the other way and the other team moving down the field. And unless the acceleration edge is profound, you don't get sacks and you don't get quarterback pressure.

And the three man rush is the ultimate in read-and-react. Rush three and you're almost guaranteed to give the QB extra time. And because even a weak-noodle quarterback can put more speed on the ball than the fastest DB can run, that means you pretty need an error by the other guy to stop them.

Three man rush = "React, react, react."

I want a defense that is "You react, you react, YOU react."

[grin1]
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Dexter_Sinister
13 years ago

Peprah replaced Collins? Interesting. And here all this time I thought Burnett was the Packer's free safety after Collins went down.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



The point you missed was that Peprah was starting because Collins was out.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

And that's okay for you to be completely wrong too. The sun will still rise.


The main issue with the Packers defense was tackling. Teams were going to get lots of passing yards no matter what, since the Packers lacked a pass rush and also the offense was putting up near historic numbers. When your team is down by a score and more, your offense abandons the running game and gets pass happy. You'd think that would make it EASIER to get a pass rush, but that just shows how inept the Packers pass rush was.

The yards given up don't bother me much. It's the crappy tackling that pisses me off and its not going to get better. I seen a clip of Jarrett Bush last night where he shoulder bumped someone out of bounds. Tackling needs to be done on every play, in my opinion, so it becomes a habit to tackle properly and to wrap up. Seeing that shoulder bump, I had to control the urge to Nolan Ryan my remote.


Oh, and yes, the three man rush is stupid.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I can tolerant (not like it but tolerate) a bump out of bounds. But I can stand it when I see it in the middle of the field with the ball carrier clearly in control of his balance.
I have been yelling for the coaches to make the players wrap up and tackle the guy for years. Slapping and pulling at the ball is another annoyance. If they hit the ball on their way to tackling, ok. If the second guy their goes for the ball after the first guy wraps up the carrier, ok. But when the first defender tries to reach in and steal the ball while the carrier is going full speed that is not ok. That usually gives them another 5-10 yards. Often more.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I can tolerant (not like it but tolerate) a bump out of bounds. But I can stand it when I see it in the middle of the field with the ball carrier clearly in control of his balance.
I have been yelling for the coaches to make the players wrap up and tackle the guy for years. Slapping and pulling at the ball is another annoyance. If they hit the ball on their way to tackling, ok. If the second guy their goes for the ball after the first guy wraps up the carrier, ok. But when the first defender tries to reach in and steal the ball while the carrier is going full speed that is not ok. That usually gives them another 5-10 yards. Often more.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



The bump out of bounds I'd be okay with ... if the Packers could tackle properly on a consistent basis. They can not, therefore, I think they should tackle every single time. Get comfortable doing it. Get used to doing it. Do it the right away. I'm reminded of a couple quotes...

Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect.



Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.



I am confident without any numbers to support the statement that if the Packers would have committed 50% less missed tackles, they would have went 19 - 0. I hate, absolutely HATE how poor tackling is in the NFL, and more passionately with the Packers.

I was talking to my dad about tackling the other day. He wasn't the biggest guy either in High School and he said he would take out the legs. He said I was foolish for how I tackled. I did it how I was told I had to, or I'd be on the bench. I wasn't big in High School but I sure as fuck wasn't going to let someone get past me and embarrass me.

Since I've been watching so much Olympics, ... NFL players not being able to tackle is like a swimmer not being able to backstroke!!


FIX THE FUCKING TACKLING!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (7h) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7h) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (8h) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (8h) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (8h) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (8h) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (8h) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (19h) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (20h) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (23h) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

6-Aug / Around The NFL / wpr

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.