uffda udfa
10 years ago

Dude quit trying to skin it

You NEVER read the article till yesterday.

You are what I said you were a year ago.

ONE TRICK PONY!

E end the most casual football fan knows pro bowl election has no relevance,
The author clearly stated he was just coming from a different perspective.

Stay with the agenda one trick, as the NFL goes, sooner or later everyone retires or gets fired.

Maybe you will be right in another 5 years.

Until then it Will be entertaining to see how many ways you can come up with to try and maker your mootless point..

Ted Thompson is one of the best.

If he wasn't he would have been ran out of Green Bay years ago.

Can't wait for Ted to make you look the fool during the draft.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.







UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.






Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If you were a fish,
You would be stuffed and Hangin g on my trophy wall right now!

HOOK,LINE AND SINKER!

😄😄😄😄😄😄



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DakotaT
10 years ago
I hate to interrupt all this sexual tensions between Uffda and Uncle Buck; but until Ted Thompson actually builds a defense, we're still the same team as the Sherman Packers, that went on one hell of a run in 2010.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I didn't say Ted Thompson coaches the defense, I said he needs to build a defense. And that means providing the correct players for Dom's 3-4. That means you don't draft 4-3 defensive ends to play OLB, or draft defensive tackles to play DE.

But thanks just the same for the snarky comment. You know I just thrive on that stuff.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
10 years ago

I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think Ted Thompson is a good General Manager, as do the majority of folks around the league, but I've wanted Dom Capers gone for several years now. He isn't a horrible coach, but he definitely isn't a great coach. He's average, at best. How much talent does the guy need to field an above average defense? He has had enough talent for an above average defense at least, perhaps not much more than that.

I'm also not sure what took so long to get rid of Slocum. I wish there was more prompt accountability.
greengold
10 years ago

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.






uffda udfa
10 years ago

Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.

Originally Posted by: greengold 



I'm still rejoicing. Usually, when you waive players who have been starters you have another guy ready to go in his place. Do we? I don't think so. As I said, previously, this approach has been taken because there is "nothing to lose"...we can't be any worse with the players we'll trot out in replacement especially in Hawk's case.

We know Ted Thompson isn't signing a FA... so, what does that mean? Yup. Gulp. Here we go again heading into a season with no clue who is going to play some key positions for us. Let's just throw a draft choice out there or a UDFA or a guy from the IFL. That'll do.

Yes, it will be TT's fault. Who else's? The credit never seems to stop for what exactly I don't know. Winning division championships with one of the greatest QB's of all time? Wow.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


greengold
10 years ago
On THIS planet there isn't a single team that wins the Superbowl every year.

Patriots, Seahawks, Packers have approximately the same odds of winning it this coming year. 10-20% is the best chance any team has to do it. That means there is an 80-90% chance they WON'T win the superbowl.

So anyone can troll any fan forum with [fill in the (____) as applicable]

"(Belichick) SUCKS! (Tom Brady) is the BEST (QB) to ever play the position! Yet only ONE superbowl championship in the last (ten) years! Wow, just wow. I guess we are supposed to be happy with division championships. It's already April 3 and we don't know who our starting (CB) is yet. He let (Revis) go and doesn't have another starter in place already. Wait and see, this will be another year of make the playoffs and see what happens. Another wasted year. You koolaid drinking morons just can't see it."

It doesn't have to make any sense. The beauty of it is there is at least an 80-90% chance you will be "proven" right at the end of the year. "Yet another year without a superbowl win. See, that (Belichick) really does suck. He should fire his head coach." :cussing:


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6h) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (6h) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7h) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7h) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7h) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7h) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7h) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (18h) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (19h) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (22h) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

6-Aug / Around The NFL / wpr

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.