This will be a little bit different. Good or bad?

---

All change is evil.
I worked a chain once for a high school game. Since I was the newby they stuck me at the end. The ref told me where to put the stick and I did what I was told. I was only a couple of years out of high school it was a lot of fun. Sadly they didn't ask for my help again.

---

I'm confused, why the heck should we trust a "virtual" measurement? Especially if they're not explaining how they're doing the virtual measurement.

Because virtually, they could put the ball in the Playboy Mansion, that doesn't mean the NFL ball carrier carried it to that spot.

So what is marking the ball?

A human? A virtual human? AI? Computer? Is there a chip in the ball? How does the process work? As at the end of the day, someone or something has to choose a virtual spot for the virtual ball...

And how do we know that spot is realistic to what actually happened on the field?


It might be good, but I'm not going to trust it until I see more details, and see how it actually works....


Of course, I don't trust the NFL, I fully believe the NFL has changed rules mid-season, stated the rule has not changed, and ruled it incorrectly to what the stated rulebook says, for like 1.5 years and then updated the rulebook after seeing that it works.

So the NFL doesn't follow the rules... so I don't trust them either.

---

This does nothing to better the game. It's all about the point spread of the game and where the official places the ball. Put a chip in both in ends of the ball and all doubt will be removed. Just like, it's not how many voted, it's who counts the vote. And why don't they put cameras on the goal line?