RedSoxExcel
15 years ago
Interesting read, he seems kind of bitter against Rodgers and he is not taking into account his age, experience, OL, etc.

But this is my general feeling on him. Great QB, great guy (doesn't throw teammates under the bus), tough as nails, great potential but not quite "there" yet. Its not fair but your judged by wins and losses in the NFL even though it is a team game. But I really thought when we were down 31-26 with the ball in the Vikings game, that was going to be "it", but it wasn't. Hopefully with more experience, better OL, etc., things will change with the beating bad teams only.


http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/68963672.html 

Numbers are lost in translation
Rodgers' statistics are impressive, but playing poor teams has helped
By Rob Reischel


Green Bay It's a safe bet that fantasy football owners everywhere love Aaron Rodgers. The Green Bay Packers quarterback is fifth in the NFL in touchdown passes (14), sixth in passing yards (1,989) and has just two interceptions.

While Rodgers might be winning games for fantasy owners, he's not posting any big wins for the Packers. And right now, he's quickly gaining a reputation for being a stats guy but not a winning quarterback.

In 23 starts, Rodgers has compiled a disappointing 10-13 record (.435). And good luck finding a signature win, as only two of Rodgers' victories have come against teams with a winning record when they played Green Bay.

Meanwhile, the consistent theme in Rodgers' losses has been mediocre performances early on.

In some of those games, Rodgers and the offense played better in the second half - such as Green Bay's 38-26 loss to Minnesota on Sunday.

But often, those offensive woes have left the Packers too big of a hole to escape. Rodgers' final numbers have then wound up inflated because opposing defenses are content allowing time to run while Rodgers & Co. pad their stats.

The only victories he has against plus-.500 teams came in 2008 vs. Chicago (5-4) and Indianapolis (3-2). And six of Rodgers' 10 wins have come against Detroit, Seattle, Cleveland and St. Louis - a trio that's a combined 14-79 since the start of last season.

"He's a good football player, but it's a team game," Packer coach Mike McCarthy said of Rodgers.

"It's about wins and losses and the ability to pull it all together. You look at everything that evolves around your football team, and Aaron is part of the solution. There is no doubt about it. He is definitely one of the positives, but he has things he needs to work on too, just like every member of our football team."

One of those is starting faster.

In Green Bay's three losses this year, Rodgers has gone 25 of 44 for 304 yards, two touchdowns and one interception in the first half.

That's a passer rating of 83.9, which certainly isn't a bad number, but it's also nowhere near Rodgers' NFL-leading mark of 110.4.

In the second half of those losses, Rodgers is 48 for 73 for 628 yards, four touchdown and no interceptions. That's a passer rating of 111.0.

The greatest discrepancy in Rodgers' performance came in the latest loss to the Vikings. Rodgers had a miserable first half, going 5 of 11 for 38 yards with no touchdowns and a 54.4 passer rating.

Overall, Green Bay managed just 47 net yards in the half, its fewest since a 31-10 loss in Denver on Oct. 17, 1999. Not surprisingly, the Packers were in a 17-3 hole to the Vikings.

"We weren't in a rhythm," Rodgers said of Green Bay's first half struggles. "I think that's the first thing. That was due to a lack of execution.

"I was a little bit off in the first half and we were struggling with the field position battle a little bit, too. . . . We didn't really get the momentum back until the third quarter."

Rodgers and the Packers did get rolling after halftime. In fact, Green Bay scored on four straight possessions - three touchdowns and one field goal - to close within 31-26.

The Packers abandoned their putrid rushing game and let Rodgers wing it around the field against Minnesota's overmatched secondary.

Rodgers had a second half passer rating of 128.3 after completing 21 of 30 for 249 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions.

"I started hitting guys that were open," Rodgers said. "The first half I struggled, missed a couple throws I should have hit. When we get into a rhythm on offense, we're tough to stop."

A major knock on Rodgers, though, is that he hasn't delivered at the most critical times.

Rodgers went 0-7 in games decided by four points or less in 2008. And eight different times last year, Rodgers had a chance to pull out a game in the final five minutes and failed in each instance.

This year, Rodgers briefly quieted those naysayers when he threw a 50-yard, game-winning touchdown to Greg Jennings in a 21-15 season-opening win over Chicago. And midway through the fourth quarter of Sunday's game with Minnesota, Rodgers had a chance for a career-defining drive.

Trailing, 31-26, with 8:13 left, Rodgers and the Packers took over at their own 19. Just two plays later, the Packers had marched to Minnesota's 28.

But on second and 3, Rodgers took his sixth sack of the game, losing five yards on the play. Rodgers then threw incomplete on third down, and Mason Crosby proceeded to miss a 51-yard field goal.

Brett Favre and the Vikings reclaimed the ball - and quickly regained all momentum.

On Minnesota's first play, Favre hit Adrian Peterson for 44 yards on a screen pass. Then two plays later, Favre hummed a 16-yard touchdown pass to Bernard Berrian.

Ball game.

"I hate losing to whoever's at quarterback for them," Rodgers said. "I hate losing to the Vikings, especially. (They're) division rivals (and we) don't like those (losses) at home.

"We just could not keep that momentum and could not finish off the drive we had to take the lead, so that was disappointing. It doesn't matter who you play, though, it's tough to lose."


blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
The thing with playing bad teams ... every team plays bad teams. The Packers are doing better against the bad teams than other teams are. I don't think the Packers nor players should be faulted for that.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
I can easily tell this is slanted to make Aaron look not so good. I like how it conveniently says he has won 2 games against teams with winning records. That automatically throws out two of Rodgers biggest wins. Opening season last and this year. Those teams were 0-0 so they had no record and were not counted.

The W-L thing is a joke. Flacco had more wins last year, while winning with <150 yards and 0 TD. Rodgers loses with 300 and 2 TD. Rodgers is a great QB, and will be for a long time, as long as we don't kill him.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
RedSoxExcel
15 years ago

I can easily tell this is slanted to make Aaron look not so good. I like how it conveniently says he has won 2 games against teams with winning records. That automatically throws out two of Rodgers biggest wins. Opening season last and this year. Those teams were 0-0 so they had no record and were not counted.

The W-L thing is a joke. Flacco had more wins last year, while winning with <150 yards and 0 TD. Rodgers loses with 300 and 2 TD. Rodgers is a great QB, and will be for a long time, as long as we don't kill him.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Me anyway is not saying he's a bad QB or something. Its not an all or nothing thing. I just feel that he's not quite "there" yet like a Matt Ryan or even a Joe Flacco. He hasn't been able to have a lot of those signature wins. Last year, 8 times with ball to take lead or win and failing each time is pretty bad and that 31-26 drive/the first half in big Vikings games are not so good. He's still a great QB but all I am saying is that he hasn't turned the corner into turning the corner yet in winning games for his team.

He's young and the sample size is small, so it will come with time I assume. But just like any other QB in the league, there are areas for improvement and one of them is winning games for his team. I think its hard to argue against that.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
We've debated that eight games thing and proved it was not accurate.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago

I can easily tell this is slanted to make Aaron look not so good. I like how it conveniently says he has won 2 games against teams with winning records. That automatically throws out two of Rodgers biggest wins. Opening season last and this year. Those teams were 0-0 so they had no record and were not counted.

The W-L thing is a joke. Flacco had more wins last year, while winning with <150 yards and 0 TD. Rodgers loses with 300 and 2 TD. Rodgers is a great QB, and will be for a long time, as long as we don't kill him.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Me anyway is not saying he's a bad QB or something. Its not an all or nothing thing. I just feel that he's not quite "there" yet like a Matt Ryan or even a Joe Flacco. He hasn't been able to have a lot of those signature wins. Last year, 8 times with ball to take lead or win and failing each time is pretty bad and that 31-26 drive/the first half in big Vikings games are not so good. He's still a great QB but all I am saying is that he hasn't turned the corner into turning the corner yet in winning games for his team.

He's young and the sample size is small, so it will come with time I assume. But just like any other QB in the league, there are areas for improvement and one of them is winning games for his team. I think its hard to argue against that.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



IMO the bolded statement is a joke. Nothing personal

Rodgers is a better QB than either Ryan of Flacco, even though I like Ryan alot, and Flacco some. Ryan had the #2 rushing attack. Falco had the #4 rushing and #2 defense. I would have more wins than Rodgers.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
longtimefan
15 years ago
Browns= 1 td no int, 110 yards

Lions= 2 tds no int, 155 yards

Rams = 1 td and 1 int 232 yards

total of 4 tds and 1 int 497 yards

Who is this?
RedSoxExcel
15 years ago

We've debated that eight games thing and proved it was not accurate.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Ok, I just took it from the article. But I don't get why its impossible that he has some flaws:

Good:

Strong character (took over for a HOF QB and survived AND with class)

Tough as nails (gets up after every hit and has played injured)

Great teammate (doesn't throw the OL under the bus in the media)

Strong arm (can sling it anywhere)

Decent speed and not afraid to run it (great for us considering our OL)

Great statistics (last year and this year)

Starting to use all wide receivers, TEs, FBs, RBs, etc.

Etc.


Not So Good:

Holds on to the ball too long/Game Management (I don't know how this can be denied, i.e. Vikings safety, you have ot know your in the end zone)

"Clutch" (he has failed a bunch of times, maybe not 8 or whatever but Falcons game, bad, Matt Ryan good. Tampa Bay late game INT, not good. Vikings game, 31-26 drive bad, Favre 31-26 drive good. Can you honestly say you would choose him if you were down by 4 in the 4th quarter, one drive over "the" guys like Favre, Brady and Manning? No of course not but he's young, it will come)

Win-Loss record (has not had a lot of signature wins and has already had as many losing seasons as Favre)

Not taking Risks (Yes he has a great TD/INT ratio but sometimes you have to sling it. I love what he did when we were down 38-26, he took some risks and tried to thread the needle, worst happens you get picked off. Favre was Mr. INT but he is also the winningest QB ever, so sometimes you have to do it)

Etc.



But those things can be corrected with age and experience and are not physical. And enough with these "well if he had a great OL and had Barry Sanders in his prime and had Jerry Rice has his 3rd WR", it'd be different. Its life, your play with the cards your dealt.

Do you consider Jay Cutler as a top 5 QB because if he had WRs and a RB, he'd be way better? Favre had garbage offenses at times where Billy Schroder was his #1 WR, etc. but he still won a ton of games (difference is Rodgers is young and Favre was older, its not saying Rodgers sucks, it just saying he's not there yet). We can't constantly make excuses for him. At some point he has to just plain win and have game winning drives. It will happen but I don't think its the end of the world that it hasn't happened so far. I'm just pointing out that its not an all or nothing argument, he can be in between perfect and Jamarcus Russel.
blank
RedSoxExcel
15 years ago



IMO the bolded statement is a joke. Nothing personal

Rodgers is a better QB than either Ryan of Flacco, even though I like Ryan alot, and Flacco some. Ryan had the #2 rushing attack. Falco had the #4 rushing and #2 defense. I would have more wins than Rodgers.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Joe Flacco and Matt Ryan ARE there. They are on winning teams, winning games and putting together great drives (i.e. Flacco v. Favre - he put them ahead until Favre came back and then again after that). Plus they are in their SECOND year in the league. Rodgers at least got to sit behind Favre and learn a bit.

They are winners, that is ALL I mean. I am not saying if you put them in a QB Challenge in Hawaii, they would win. I just find it hard to argue that if your down 24-20 in the 4th quarter, you would take Rodgers over Joe Cool or Matty Ice (at this point). But thats just opinion and you can see it differently.
blank
Rockmolder
15 years ago
Combined stats against Detroit, Cleveland and St. Louis.

57/80 (71.3%) for 873 yards (10.9 avg), with 7 TDs and 1 Int.

Combined stats against Minnesota x 2 and Cincinnatti.

73/117 (62.4%) for 932 yards (8.0 avg), with 6 TDs and 1 Int.

I left the Bears out on purpose. Don't know where to place them. They're somewhere in between those 6 teams.

The thing that stands out to me is that he's still playing amazing games against these strong teams. Maybe not in the first half, but overall, he puts up some impressive stats.

The thing that I noticed is the 'low' average (still high by league standards) in these big games. Once again, it shows that they tend to figure out that constantly going deep doesn't work well against these strong teams. Problem is, they usually find out too late.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (8h) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (8h) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (8h) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (8h) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (8h) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (8h) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (8h) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (19h) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (20h) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

6-Aug / Around The NFL / wpr

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.