Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

He'll win more than he'll cost ya.

"Zero2Cool wrote:



I'm not convinced that will be the case this year.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Thus, eliminating the writers perspective that Favre is to blame for the loss.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How many points did the Vikings lose by and didn't Favre fumble the ball in the end zone that was recovered for a touchdown?

I didn't watch the game, I was watching professional football on CBS. Packers vs Bills.

"Formo" wrote:



Vikings - Dolphins box score on Google. 

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I should have figured you wouldn't understand it.

Guess I have to explain this a little better for the 'young' crowd.

Vikings lost by 4.
The fumble gave the Dolphins 6 plus 1 on the extra point.
That is a 3 point difference.


The loss was not Brett's fault though. But the loss to the Cardinals in the playoffs last year was Rodgers fault. Right?



Brett cost the Vikings the game, period. He'll win more than he'll cost ya. Come to terms with it and move forward.

"Formo" wrote:



But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
longtimefan
14 years ago
a loss or win really never should be based on just one guy

but when it comes to Rodgers haters a loss does..

You seen that here you know you have
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Formo" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

All the Favre fans were saying that they will finally win it this year because Favre will play as well as he did last year. I said that it is more likely for him to have his worst season ever than it would be for him to have his 2 career best years back to back at age 40-41.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a 36+ turnover year with a rating below 70.

The most they should realistically expect is his average year. Mid 80s rating and mid 20s in turnovers.

With their run D failing, the secondary weak, the blocking on the O-line being inconsistent and no wide receiver threats, Favre will struggle to even be average. At his age and lack of mobility, worst ever seem more probable.

Add in the fact that they play something like 7 of the first 9 games against playoff teams from last year. And they already lost to 1 of the 2 that didn't make the playoffs.

A weak splat, softly in the distance, with no meaning or relevance. Out of contention and inconsequential. Favre's swan song will be crickets chirping as some one turns of the Dome lights.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One lost fumble that gave the opponent 7 points.
They lost by four points.


It's not as if Brett threw 3 TD's that kept them in the game. The Vikings were in the game in SPITE of the play at the QB position.



I don't understand why people continue to make excuses for the man. He's human, he had a bad game and it cost his team. It's not the end of the world. He's also a key reason they won a few of the games last year. First one comes to mind the 49ers game, they won the game because of Brett. Sure, Greg could have dropped the ball, but without Brett's superior pocket presence, that game never gets a W for the Vikings.

It's okay to say they lost because of the QB, just like its okay to say they won because of the QB. Obviously its a team game, but one position sure can make it hard to win the game. That's exactly what happened for the Vikings. The QB did them no favors.

Call it however you wish, but know that the QB position cost the Vikings the game. Stevie Wonder says that was obvious to the naked eye.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Formo" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Formo" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?

"Formo" wrote:



If you start with the what ifs and take away mistakes, you could also take away the gift fumbles by Williams and Brown. If the Vikings had not been given the ball on the 2, would they have scored? Take that away and the Vikings scored 3 on their own.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Formo
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Formo" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



If you start with the what ifs and take away mistakes, you could also take away the gift fumbles by Williams and Brown. If the Vikings had not been given the ball on the 2, would they have scored? Take that away and the Vikings scored 3 on their own.

"Formo" wrote:



I'm not playing the 'what if' game. I'm just stating that the loss yesterday (two days ago, officially) can not be blamed soley on Favre.

This is all.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One lost fumble that gave the opponent 7 points.
They lost by four points.


It's not as if Brett threw 3 TD's that kept them in the game. The Vikings were in the game in SPITE of the play at the QB position.



I don't understand why people continue to make excuses for the man. He's human, he had a bad game and it cost his team. It's not the end of the world. He's also a key reason they won a few of the games last year. First one comes to mind the 49ers game, they won the game because of Brett. Sure, Greg could have dropped the ball, but without Brett's superior pocket presence, that game never gets a W for the Vikings.

It's okay to say they lost because of the QB, just like its okay to say they won because of the QB. Obviously its a team game, but one position sure can make it hard to win the game. That's exactly what happened for the Vikings. The QB did them no favors.

Call it however you wish, but know that the QB position cost the Vikings the game. Stevie Wonder says that was obvious to the naked eye.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



The what ifs don't mean anything. Favre played horribly. But he was not the only one. Peterson could have gotten one more yard. Tahi could have thrown one block. The line could have protected better. Harvin could have caught that pass that was intercepted. The list of IFs is endless.

Favre was not the only guy screwing up out there. He is only responsible for his own play. He is responsible for waving off the FG unit and blowing it on 4th down from comfortable field goal range. For missing camp and not having timing. For throwing into double coverage, late and behind receivers. For not getting rid of the ball in the endzone. But it took all 53 of them to lose. Plus all of the coaches.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (6h) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (9h) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (14h) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
8h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

16h / Around The NFL / wpr

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.