Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
I don't text much. Those little keys drive me nuts.

But if it weren't for the keys, I'd much prefer texting to the phone.

And email to both.

Of course I have this long-standing phobia with phones, which might have something to do with it. My land line (yes i still have one) is on an answering machine, and my cell phone has the ringer turned off about half the time.

I'm one of those modern "social anxiety" types. Have been longer than there have been personal computers.

So, on this one, I'm part of the problem, I expect.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
You can text to the phone, if you were not already aware.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago


I've actually had girls admit to me that when they're walking down the sidewalk chattering on their phones, there's often no one on the other end -- they're just doing it so it looks like they have a social life and no one thinks they're uncool. (Because, you know, it would be humiliating to turn to the person walking next to you and say something like, um, "Hi, what's your name?")

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



This is the funniest to me. The worst I see this is when people are in lines. Half the people in a line have their phones out. When I'm with a group of people and more than two are on their phones I like to pull mine out and either have a really annoying pretend conversation or point out the fact that were all on our phones. Besides getting a few laughs it usually gets everyone to hurry up whatever they were doing and put them away.
Porforis
14 years ago

(I mean, 8-year-olds with cell phones . . . seriously?). Reason enough for me to decide that my kids aren't getting phones until they can pay for them themselves.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Keiana (9 years old) has a phone. It has 60 minutes on it, restricted to calling me, her mom, grandma and uncle.

I don't see a problem with that.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Responsible parenting? BURN THE WITCH!
Formo
14 years ago
Haha!

Yeah, after seeing the cultural differences in my own family, our kids will not have phones unless they are paying for it themselves.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Rockmolder
14 years ago
I bet that this same article was written about television, the telephone, the internet etc. in its early stages.

Do some take it way too far? Yes. Is it obvious that I'm on a board where most members are around 30 or older? Very much.

Lol.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
It wouldn't be so bad, Detlev, if it were just one layer of social insulation. But many people apply multiple layers at once. How often do you see someone texting, while listening to a pair of headphones, while fiddling with a crossword or sudoku puzzle, while sitting behind a laptop and Facebooking for good measure?

How on earth is a real human supposed to penetrate through all those layers of digital armor?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Okay, I'll be a provocateur.

Define "real person".

Is the person on the other end of a text, or an email, or a webchat, not a real person?

Ok, I'll give you the headphones and the puzzle -- and maybe the facebook, since I don't do that I dont know what it entails/doesn't entail.

But the others *are* human interactions. Are our discussions on PackersHome not interactions in community with real people?

What is lost for certain in modern "social networking" (I hate that phrase, btw) is one thing only: attention to people in close physical proximity. But what privileges people just because they are "next door"? Are we to be left to the whims of where fate has left us to be born? Are we to be required to incur the financial and other costs of moving just to be able to "hang out with" other, more interesting people?

Think about it this way: which is worse, putting the assholes around you on "ignore" or getting so pissed off with having to deal with them that you get all stressed out and have to go home and beat your dog/kid/spouse up?

Now, to be sure, there's another danger in texting, tweeting, etc. It encourages more superficial thinking and conversation. Its hard to have a conversation in any depth if you are limited to 140 characters at a time or to typing on microscopic keys.

But, lets be honest here, too. There's a lot of phone conversation and face-to-face conversation that it is pretty damn superficial and unthoughtful, too. I'm old enough now that I enjoy getting together with adult relatives on holidays, but they were friggin' torture when I was younger. (We called the annual family potluck the "family rebellion".) And I grew up with, and love, the small town culture, that starts with coffee in a diner in the morning and a beer in the neighborhood bar at night. But I'm not sure there's anything more in those conversations than there is in the modern tech variants.

The only thing that changes is who we talk to, and who we talk about.

What makes the "face to face" people so special?

Seriously.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Rock - you're in college. Thousands of years ago when I was in college back in the 1800s, you'd actually talk to people between classes. I can't speak for the Netherlands, but out here, doesn't happen any more. The very second they walk out the door (slight exaggeration, it's probably closer to 3 or 4 seconds), they whip out the cell phone and either start texting or start gabbing. Meanwhile, people who are right in front of their faces do not exist.

Is this a bad thing?

Yes.

Wade - Just read what you wrote. What makes it so special? What makes half-dome in Yosemite so special? Can we remove the mountain and just put up a concrete substitution in its place?

There's something to be said about face-to-face interaction. I've had jobs where I could only come home for the weekends. I missed my wife terribly when I had to sleep alone in a hotel room. Just being with her and talking about nothing is magical.

For someone who is socially awkward, I think the internet and the cell phone are wonderful inventions. They can communicate with REAL people and not have to deal with their social awkwardness. So yes, for some folks (who are often wonderful people by the way), those inventions are amazing things.

But there are still people like me who love to see someone in the flesh and talk to someone in the flesh. I don't get the same feeling with a phone. When I was a teenager and my early 20s, I'd have phone calls with girls for hours, literally. Fun, but so much better if they were sitting in my room with me. Some of the best memories I've had were with girls in Texas staying up until 3 AM or sometimes until the sun came up (where I had to jump out their windows before their parents woke up). Magical moments.

Not just with girls though. Some of my most emotionally intimate conversations have been with male friends. Talking in person for me is so much better than the phone.

So I guess it comes down to the person. Is it easier for you to communicate by phone or in the flesh? There is no right answer. Your answer determines your preference for technology or no technology. I'd just prefer no technology. That's just me though.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Rock - you're in college. Thousands of years ago when I was in college back in the 1800s, you'd actually talk to people between classes. I can't speak for the Netherlands, but out here, doesn't happen any more. The very second they walk out the door (slight exaggeration, it's probably closer to 3 or 4 seconds), they whip out the cell phone and either start texting or start gabbing. Meanwhile, people who are right in front of their faces do not exist.

Is this a bad thing?

Yes.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Why?

Seriously.

After all, a lot of those people right in front of them are pinheads. 🙂
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
47m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isaiah

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.