djcubez
14 years ago

The protesters have their rights to demonstrate, and by all accounts they have been doing it in a very respectful matter from the reports of the police monitoring it.

But then again.. I am sure you can slant any piece to fit your argument.. just as I am sure there are those demonstrating the fit all walks of life.. including those that are exploiting the cause for their own means..

"Pack93z" wrote:



Which is exactly my problem with this video. It's completely obvious he's just trying to put a bad face on the all the protesters with this video. If he really cared about the memorial why didn't he just respectfully ask them to take them down and stated his reasons? He didn't have to bring a camera and attack the people that made an ignorant mistake.
4PackGirl
14 years ago
what a joke!
Porforis
14 years ago

i agree, it seems the guy with the camera has his own agenda.

"dhpackr" wrote:



You know, kind of like every protester there. But it's an agenda you agree with, so suddenly it's okay but the camera guy's agenda is evil ;)

Oh, and thanks for completely derailing this topic.
djcubez
14 years ago

i agree, it seems the guy with the camera has his own agenda.

"Porforis" wrote:



You know, kind of like every protester there. But it's an agenda you agree with, so suddenly it's okay but the camera guy's agenda is evil ;)

Oh, and thanks for completely derailing this topic.

"dhpackr" wrote:



Well of course everyone has their own agenda. It just so happens that a lot of people have a certain aspect in common on their agendas and have gathered together in that aspect.

I have no problem with either person's opinion in this situation. Both parties have the right to voice and hold their opinions. However I disagree with the way the guy with the camera approached the situation. He seemed to be antagonizing the protesters and trying to get a rise out of them. He seemed to be trying to create a scene or solicit a negative reaction.

The protesters were very much innocently and peacefully going about their business and were not putting the posters on the memorial to deliberately disrespect it. The person with the camera was obviously trying to make it seem that that was the case. He was blatantly trying to shed a negative light on what has been a very positive protest.

If anyone I agreed with were to employ these tactics I would be ashamed to have to be associated with them.
Porforis
14 years ago

i agree, it seems the guy with the camera has his own agenda.

"djcubez" wrote:



You know, kind of like every protester there. But it's an agenda you agree with, so suddenly it's okay but the camera guy's agenda is evil ;)

Oh, and thanks for completely derailing this topic.

"Porforis" wrote:



Well of course everyone has their own agenda. It just so happens that a lot of people have a certain aspect in common on their agendas and have gathered together in that aspect.

I have no problem with either person's opinion in this situation. Both parties have the right to voice and hold their opinions. However I disagree with the way the guy with the camera approached the situation. He seemed to be antagonizing the protesters and trying to get a rise out of them. He seemed to be trying to create a scene or solicit a negative reaction.

The protesters were very much innocently and peacefully going about their business and were not putting the posters on the memorial to deliberately disrespect it. The person with the camera was obviously trying to make it seem that that was the case. He was blatantly trying to shed a negative light on what has been a very positive protest.

If anyone I agreed with were to employ these tactics I would be ashamed to have to be associated with them.

"dhpackr" wrote:



Of course the guy wanted to drum things up , it got posted on youtube so there was some intent there to portray things in a specific light. But as far as his reaction goes, I really don't think it was unreasonable or not indicative of someone who is legitimately offended.

He was offended, asked if they realized it was a war memorial, and was pretty much told to piss off when he asked them to take it down. As for the whole argument with the lady over memorials, if I was arguing with someone who refused to stop doing something I found to be deeply disrespectful who suddenly said "Well, I make _____" for a living I'd find it awfully suspect.

How was he supposed to go about this? "Hi, do you realize this is a war memorial? I find it offensive that you'd cover it up. No, you don't think so? Okay, can you please take it down? No? Please? Please?". The fact of the matter is that when you offend someone, intentionally or not, people are going to be upset. If you give this guy the benefit of the doubt, I think he showed a lot of restraint.
porky88
14 years ago

They should have stopped being so stubborn and just moved. If they think their little setup is going to make or break their cause, then they are full of it.

With that said, I was thinking the video was going to have sort of vandalism or disgraceful act and/or rhetoric. The title made it seem worse than what it was. Just sayin'

"Porforis" wrote:



The title said "WI Capitol protesters disrespect the Veterans Memorial". I'd say covering up a veterans memorial with political material is disrespectful. Kind of confused here.

"porky88" wrote:



Theyre guilty of being stubborn and stupid. The intent was not to cause any harm or disrespect the memorial. I wasn't there, so maybe the video isn't a good representation of their intent. But based on what I saw in this eight-minute video, I don't think they meant to disrespect.
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

The people that put the posters up were a bit dumb in the first place .

"djcubez" wrote:

Of course they were dumb. If they were smart they wouldn't have posted political messages all over a war memorial. Stupidity is no excuse.
Porforis
14 years ago

Theyre guilty of being stubborn and stupid. The intent was not to cause any harm or disrespect the memorial. I wasn't there, so maybe the video isn't a good representation of their intent. But based on what I saw in this eight-minute video, I don't think they meant to disrespect.

"porky88" wrote:



Negligence/ignorance isn't really an excuse in this case, although that falls more into the realm of opinion. Regardless, one would need to be pretty thick to take a look at a war memorial, then put posters on top of it without even thinking that "Hey, maybe this is kind of disrespectful". You just don't cover up memorials of any kind, period.
vikesrule
14 years ago

Keep it classy, Democrats....

"Porforis" wrote:



I honestly really don't care if it's a war memorial or not.
I'd put a sign on it. These people seem to care way too much about a simple symbolic piece of glass and rock.....

"djcubez" wrote:



Interesting that the two of you, on opposing sides of the issue, have both managed to tick me off.

Porforis, your disclaimer doesn't cut it.
I did not see/hear anywhere in that video anything about any of them being "Democrats". Not that that matters.
You are obviously of the Rush Limbaugh ilk and lump all Democrats in one category.
Your brief statement, sans "disclaimer" insinuates that I have no class...
I am a Democrat.
I am a Veteran.
I am a combat Veteran, wounded in action, but that is nothing compared to the friends that I saw killed around me.
Thank you....


djcubez
What you said really pisses me off. You have no fucking idea what these memorials mean to so many, many people.
I saw a very good friend of mine die in April of 1971 in a firefight in a shithole called Vietnam.
He was a couple of months short of his 21st birthday, and left behind an 18 month old daughter.
His name is on the Wall in Washington DC.
If I were there and you hung a protest sign of any kind on the memorial to him and the thousands of others, I would end up in jail.
Cause even at my age, I would go fucking ballistic on your ass.


These people have every right to protest, it is exactly one of the basic freedoms and rights that some of my friends and so many others fought and died for.
But they must remember and respect those who gave their all for that right.

As far as who is responsible that video, Ann Althouse is a twit.
Dulak
14 years ago
hmmm talked to my mom about the protests the other day. Shes a school teacher in illinois (was in wisconsin). I think she supports em; and she voted republican the last couple of elections.

I find politics a little 'amusing' ... seems when there are actions done by the government there always appears to be another agenda then the one that is presented.

Like I have to wonder about the strong response countries have on libya ... is it just because their feelings on human rights violations? or is it again because of the Oil ...

anyways ... not much to do with the OP -
Fan Shout
dfosterf (8h) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.