CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
Right now the Wild Card Games would be
Bears at Saints
Lions at Giants

Good chance the divisional round would be a third game with a divisional opponent.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

1.5. The goal is home field advantage. We should be severely disappointed with anything less.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



2 games.
I am only thinking about winning the division right now. Lock that up first then move on to the first round bye and then the best record in the conference after that. I normally don't begin my climb on the third rung of a ladder.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

2 games.
I am only thinking about winning the division right now. Lock that up first then move on to the first round bye and then the best record in the conference after that. I normally don't begin my climb on the third rung of a ladder.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I do. I have long legs.

Born and bred a cheesehead
CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
Some trivia questions for some of you that follow this thread:

1) What 3 teams have been in playoff position all 7 weeks?
(Hint: 2 NFC, 1 AFC)

2) Which team appeared in playoff position for the first time this week?

3) Which NFC teams made the playoffs last year and have not been in playoff position yet this season?
blank
Dulak
13 years ago
So whom do we have left?

@Chargers - tough game considering our d hasnt stopped many points ... I still dont get why bernett is playing with a broken hand; he wont be getting many interceptions with that hand ...
IMO I see us winning but will be a close one


Vikings - another win; its at home and its the queens


Buccaneers - we win this one


@Lions - my friend back home says we usually lose thanksgiving game vs the lions ... hmmm Id rather not but should be a good game


@Giants - another tough one


Raiders - least we got the raiders at home


@Chiefs - gimnmie game


Bears - I knew I needed something else to do for christmas (all my cousins are bears fans and should be a good game to watch at their house).


Lions - who knows but I say we win



needless to say Im glad we have a lead in our division ... not many gimmie games ... lions on thanksgiving, charges and giants should be fun
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago




@Lions - my friend back home says we usually lose thanksgiving game vs the lions ... hmmm Id rather not but should be a good game

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



I depends how you looks at their record. If you want to include all the games from the 50's they do have a losing record. If you want to look at things in the at 10 years. No they don't. Detroit always plays them tough but GB has still one most of the recent games.

N22, 1951 @ Detroit Lions L 52 -35
N27, 1952 @ Detroit Lions L 48 -24
N26, 1953 @ Detroit Lions L 34 -15
N25, 1954 @ Detroit Lions L 28 -24
N24, 1955 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -10
N22, 1956 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -20
N28, 1957 @ Detroit Lions L 18 -6
N27, 1958 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -14
N26, 1959 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -17
N24, 1960 @ Detroit Lions L 23 -10
N23, 1961 @ Detroit Lions W 17 -9
N22, 1962 @ Detroit Lions L 26 -14
N28, 1963 @ Detroit Lions T 13 -13
N26, 1970 @ Dallas Cowboys L 16 -3
N22, 1984 @ Detroit Lions L 31 -28
N27, 1986 @ Detroit Lions W 44 -40
N24, 1994 @ Dallas Cowboys L 42 -31
N22, 2001 @ Detroit Lions W 29 -27
N27, 2003 @ Detroit Lions L 22 -14
N22, 2007 @ Detroit Lions W 37 -26
N26, 2009 @ Detroit Lions W 34 -12

UserPostedImage
gbguy20
13 years ago

I depends how you looks at their record. If you want to include all the games from the 50's they do have a losing record. If you want to look at things in the at 10 years. No they don't. Detroit always plays them tough but GB has still one most of the recent games.

N22, 1951 @ Detroit Lions L 52 -35
N27, 1952 @ Detroit Lions L 48 -24
N26, 1953 @ Detroit Lions L 34 -15
N25, 1954 @ Detroit Lions L 28 -24
N24, 1955 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -10
N22, 1956 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -20
N28, 1957 @ Detroit Lions L 18 -6
N27, 1958 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -14
N26, 1959 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -17
N24, 1960 @ Detroit Lions L 23 -10
N23, 1961 @ Detroit Lions W 17 -9
N22, 1962 @ Detroit Lions L 26 -14
N28, 1963 @ Detroit Lions T 13 -13
N26, 1970 @ Dallas Cowboys L 16 -3
N22, 1984 @ Detroit Lions L 31 -28
N27, 1986 @ Detroit Lions W 44 -40
N24, 1994 @ Dallas Cowboys L 42 -31
N22, 2001 @ Detroit Lions W 29 -27
N27, 2003 @ Detroit Lions L 22 -14
N22, 2007 @ Detroit Lions W 37 -26
N26, 2009 @ Detroit Lions W 34 -12

Originally Posted by: wpr 




didn't we play them on thanksgiving last year? i really hope my memory isnt that bad.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

didn't we play them on thanksgiving last year? i really hope my memory isnt that bad.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 


sorry, Detroit played New England
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

True, although it is a rare Super Bowl that features both Number 1 seeds. I did the math last year (I'd have to dig up the thread). If I remember correctly, only 13% of Super Bowls have featured two Number 1 seeds. I created that thread to point out that even though they were a Number 6, there was still hope for the Packers, since there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I did a quick check of seeds making the Super Bowl going back to 1978, the first season there was a wild card round. While the top seed in each conference meet in only 7 of the 33 Super Bowls (21.2%), at least 1 top seed made the Super Bowl in 29 of 33 years (87.9%). Granted it's been more common as of late for lower seeds to make it. Being a number 1 seed is still a huge advantage. For the record, each of the four seasons in which a number 1 did not make it, a number 2 did.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.

Nonstopdrivel wrote:



There is a syntactical ambiguity to my statement, which could be interpreted as saying that it was likely that neither Number 1 seed would make it to the Super Bowl. What I meant to say is that there was an 87 percent chance that the Super Bowl would feature either one or no Number 1 seed. In other words, there was only a 13 percent chance that both top seeds would be in the Super Bowl.

It is very common that a Super Bowl features a Number 1 seed. It is quite rare that it features both Number 1 seeds. That pattern held true this year as well.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (19m) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (23m) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (24m) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (25m) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (1h) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (1h) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
dfosterf (29-Jul) : 50 cent hookers? I'm moving to Green Bay. I thought it was just real estate that was more affordable there. 😂
Zero2Cool (29-Jul) : Sure seems site going down more than 50¢ hooker
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : Golden with two TDs in red zone drills today
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
17m / Fantasy Sports Talk / dhazer

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.