wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Clay Matthews' return from injury helped the Green Bay Packers dominate the Chicago Bears offense with his big impact in rushing the passer and helping to stop the run.

He finished the game with a crazy stat-line of two sacks, four tackles for a loss, and two pass defenses in his first game back from the hamstring injury that kept him out of the lineup for four games.

Matthews was especially productive considering he didn't play the full amount of snaps, as the Packers tried to ease him back into game action.

Initially, the Packers struggled to contain the Bears running game and Matt Forte. He rushed for 37 yards on the game's opening drive as the Bears drove down the field with ease. A false start penalty and an incompletion forced a punt. It was nice to force a punt, but it appeared it would be a long day with Forte running wild.

On the second possession, Matthews showed his ability to impact the game in other ways than through rushing the passer. With the game still waiting to be broken open, the Bears had great field position and had been having their way in the run game.

The Bears ran Forte for a 1-yard gain on first down and lined up looking ready to run on second down, needing nine yards for a first down.

B.J. Raji and Matthews got a great burst off the snap and each had a step on their blockers. Both were in great position if the hand-off were to go to Forte.

As the ball got handed off to Forte, Matthews' blocker had already failed at his desperation dive, leaving one Bears lineman, J'Marcus Webb, to deal with both Raji and Matthews. That's probably the best scenario the Packers could ask for on a given play.

As Raji got past Webb, Matthews gave a little nudge to ensure Webb was unable to recover to make the block.

Matthews then immediately bolted for Forte and finished the play as Raji can't bring down Forte. The loss of four yards turned a manageable down-and-distance into third-and-long. The Bears couldn't convert and the Packers were able to get the ball and take back some ground in the early battle for field position.

On the next drive, Matthews showed his vital impact in the pass rush with the same type of playmaking ability that ended a Chicago attack. His sack of Jay Cutler on third down forced another Bears punt.

Later in the game, Matthews got his second sack on a play that helped the Packers keep the Bears at a distance.

After an offensive pass interference penalty on Alshon Jeffery and a 3-yard gain by Forte, the Bears faced a second-and-long situation.

They lined up in an obvious passing formation with nobody in the backfield alongside Jay Cutler. The Packers lined up with Raji and Mike Daniels as the only down linemen and Matthews and Dezman Moses as outside backers.

The Packers ran a stunt with Matthews coming over the top of Raji and attacking the middle of the Bears offensive line as both linemen, Matthews and Moses, rush the passer.

As Matthews got over the top, two Bears blocked Raji, two blocked Daniels and one blocked Moses, leaving Matthews a free run at Cutler.

Matthews makes the Bears pay for their offensive line miscue by sacking Jay Cutler and forcing an insurmountable distance to gain on third down. The Bears line was so focused on Raji and Matthews coming from the left side, that when Matthews got towards the middle, the Bears were out of position.

The attention Matthews is able to draw allows the Packers to be much more creative in getting him and other players opportunities to find holes on the line.

If you look at the picture above, Matthews' ability to get to the quarterback not only resulted in a negative play for the Bears, but prevented a big positive one. Alshon Jeffery was able to get a step on Sam Shields and would have been open for a big-play opportunity if Cutler had had time to get the ball out of his hands.

Matthews' presence on the field was a huge factor in the Packers' ability to dominate the Bears offense both by stopping the run and rushing the passer. He consistently made big plays that ended Bears drives and kept points off the board.

With his ability to rush the passer individually and help others on the line get better matchups, Matthews also takes pressure off the secondary. This was the case when Shields was beaten by Jeffery, but Cutler was sacked.

This is the case not only on plays ending in sacks, but throughout the game as Cutler was having to throw quickly or worrying about locating Matthews and the rest of the pass rush.

Matthews being back in the lineup allows the Packers defense to get much more creative. The group has a chance to really get into a nice stride down the stretch. With a more balanced attack offensively, the Packers could be set for a long playoff run with the Matthews-led defense playing well.



the photos that go along with the narrative are at the bleacher report site. 

UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Now you people see why I say sacks are so important?

Let's do a repeat of what I said before.
2010 - we win the SB with 47 sacks
2011 - we go one and done with 29 sacks
2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Sacks more often than not end drives. [boxing]

A nice breakdown of CM3's performance that game. Yes, he helped us shut down da Bears big time.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Now you people see why I say sacks are so important?

Let's do a repeat of what I said before.
2010 - we win the SB with 47 sacks
2011 - we go one and done with 29 sacks
2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Sacks more often than not end drives. [boxing]

A nice breakdown of CM3's performance that game. Yes, he helped us shut down da Bears big time.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Sacks are important but not all sacks are equal.
A sack for a 1 yard loss on first down is a whole lot different than a 7 yard loss on 3rd down.
UserPostedImage
coltonja
12 years ago

2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Hey, zombie, I have a question for you. I was thinking about our season at work tonight and comparing it to the feeling of the 2010 team going into and early in the playoffs. I felt in 2010 that we would go all the way, whereas this season I see us winning one and then being out. But it was just a feeling, and I don't put much stock in feelings when it comes to most things yet I seem unable to shake it.

Anyway, I enjoy your insight here at PH and was wondering why you felt this way too?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Hey, zombie, I have a question for you. I was thinking about our season at work tonight and comparing it to the feeling of the 2010 team going into and early in the playoffs. I felt in 2010 that we would go all the way, whereas this season I see us winning one and then being out. But it was just a feeling, and I don't put much stock in feelings when it comes to most things yet I seem unable to shake it.

Anyway, I enjoy your insight here at PH and was wondering why you felt this way too?

Originally Posted by: coltonja 



We didn't have the D we did in 2010. It all fell apart in 2011. 🇦🇷 carried that team on his back. It will take 🇹🇹 two years to rebuild that joke of a D (2011's). 2012 is the first year. 🇹🇹 went all out D. In 2013, he'll go D again but sprinkle in a little OL. I think 2013 we'll have a better shot at winning it all.

And yes, 2010 I felt like we'd win it all. I had that feeling in 1996, 2003, and 2010. Of those 3 years, I was only wrong once. (I didn't have that feeling in 1997 as that year, we seemed like we were missing the chip on our shoulder and didn't have the Cows to piss us off).

We're definitely hungry in 2012 and have a chip on our shoulder. I'd take the 2012 team > 2011. But I think our injuries this year were worse than 2010. Our OL scares me.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (4h) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (7h) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (12h) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

14h / Around The NFL / wpr

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.