Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
10 years ago
I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

6. Needing a shut-down corner, they pick one DB who is a tweener and a second DB who is a tweener AND has only one year of college football.

7. Not drafting any OL.

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Barfarn
10 years ago
I like:
2 high quality outside CBs
1 Much better receiving Josh Cribbs and save Hyde and Cobb from getting injured.
1 Ryan who has as good as a chance as any of those other 5 ILBs to be a good/great ILB and didn't cost us a guy picked 1-3
1 FB named Rip'em'apartkowski Just don't know if cult following fans will yell Riiiiiiiip or skiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
No OLman cant afford the roster spots; next yr we'll get some Wade


Didn't like the trade up for Hundley; 3rd QB must go on PS to preserve valuable roster spot. And if you need to trade up he might not make it if he shows something; woulda liked Jesse James O'Shaughnessy or Tull instead and that effing Belicheck got Daryl Roberts w/ that 7th pick we lost...Grrrrrrrr

10 years ago
I'm excited about Randall, Rollins, and Montgomery.

Rollins' talent after only 1 year of football is off the charts. Randall just seems like a very natural cover corner (regardless of where ASU played him). I think they both have the potential to be very very nice picks.

Montgomery reminds me of Corey Bradford with slightly better hands, and maybe a slightly higher football IQ. He'll thrive with Rodgers throwing him the ball.

I'm less excited about Ryan, even though I was pumped when I saw they drafted a high effort MLB who was a captain of his defense. Watching video, he just seems to lack any kind of burst. The comparisons to Hawk seem pretty spot on.

I haven't watched video of the FB yet, but I'm glad we got one. He and Lacy could punish people.

The DE seems like a project and I don't know if he'll amount to anything. We shall see.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
10 years ago
I wonder if Ted will considering signing any additional unrestricted free agents now that it won't count against the compensatory pick selection? Isn't Brandon Spikes still available? Would Philly trade Kendricks? I'm sure there others that could push for a roster spot.

Also, I think Ted should take a chance on OT La'ell Collins. If he's cleared of charges, he would be a steal. Worth the risk and would likely be a good backup at worse.
gbguy20
10 years ago

I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

6. Needing a shut-down corner, they pick one DB who is a tweener and a second DB who is a tweener AND has only one year of college football.

7. Not drafting any OL.

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by: Wade 



in you dislike section, i disagree with everything but number 10.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
beast
10 years ago

I like not having to worry as much about teams trying to put 4 WRs on the field to simple out match the Packers CBs. While they could still try it, I feel like the CBs the Packers picked up have enough potential to hopefully keep up as they developing and once they develop I think the Packers will be in the best group of DBs they've had since Collins went down (assuming they don't lose Hayward before they develop).

I'm still worried about the Packers front 7 some, but once those DBs develop the Packers seem pretty stacked in the DB department and hopefully Capers with the pass rushers can come up with some thing in the front 7.


And hopefully the Packers offense can get them a lead so they won't be trying to run the ball all game, but having Raji back and having Pennel, Thornton, Robinson and Gaston all with a developmental year under their belts should be better as well to help with a rotation.


I don't like that the depth at TE didn't get much better.

UserPostedImage
yooperfan
10 years ago

I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

6. Needing a shut-down corner, they pick one DB who is a tweener and a second DB who is a tweener AND has only one year of college football.

7. Not drafting any OL.

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Very good analysis!

isocleas2
10 years ago
I truly like all the picks 1-5, and the positions picked in round 6 are ones we needed to address. I know nothing about the late round guys so I won't comment more than that about them.

I think alot of people were so focused on nose tackle and inside linebacker they ignored how much help we needed at CB. What's the saying you can't have enough good cornerbacks? Its even more important than ever and we just lost two key guys at the position.

I get the Jake Ryan comparisons to Hawk, but i think alot of resentment people had for Hawk came because he was a #5 overall pick. If he was drafted late in the 4th round like Ryan was I think people would be more excited about a young A.J. joining the team. I said in the other thread but this is the pick that makes the most sense for the Packers.

I'm also big on the Hundley pick. The Packers will stash him as the #3 on the roster this year, start showcasing him in year 2 and by year 3 we'll finally have a respectable backup qb behind Rodgers. Or a nice trade piece down the road.

Would I have liked the Packers to draft a nose tackle? Yes, but other than that I can find no fault with this draft class.
Rockmolder
10 years ago

I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

Originally Posted by: Wade 



I feel like you have to make a choice in the draft. After pick 1-15, you're usually out of guys who have both a high ceiling and can start for your team immediatly. There are some exceptions, of course, often having to do with character issues or positions with lesser value.

I don't think you would've gotten a guy who could've pushed for the starting CB role at 30. The best pure CB left was Jalen Strong, a guy who's seen as a project with just 10 starts under his belt in college.

Randall will have a chance to contribute, though, rather than start. I feel like he's the perfect player to move around on defense. He's versatile, athletic, smart and just a football player. He has everything but his size going for him.

What I think is that, in his first season, you can use him as a S/CB hybrid, let him play zone coverages, get him on TEs and spy on running QBs (two positions that have destroyed us in the past) and get the most out of him that way. That'd be one heck of a contribution to the team.

Then with pick 62, you just have to go with potential if you want to keep competing in the future. And we did. I love that pick and feel like we got ourselves our starter for next year. It's a shame that he won't step in right away, but he has a ridiculous skill set, with his speed being the only legitimate question in my eyes.

Then the guy we did get who could be an instant starter has little room to grow. I don't mind that much, with him being a 4th round pick and all, but what you see is what you get. A hard working and studying linebacker, with average athletic ability.

7. Not drafting any OL.



I bet you were hoping for at least 5 o-linemen, knowing you. 😝

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.



Goldman's an immovable object, but brings very little in terms of a pass rush. Kendricks is a good LBer and a steal at 45, but apart from being more of a need, nothing gave me the impression that he'd be the better pick. Wright would've been good value for us. He's a developmental prospect, but he could be great down the line. We'll just have to see how Montgomery works out.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).



The Vikings had a great draft. So had the Bears. Thing is, after every draft I get the feeling that we botched it just a bit. Ted's like the student who gets a solid B every year, while everyone else is wildly inconsistent, picking up A's and D's, eventually averaging a C.

He never goes for the big names, but follows his own scouts and scouting reports. I can appreciate that. He's proven that they get it right more than other teams.

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!



Nose tackles have such ridiculously high positional value, that it's rather hard to get a servicable one later on. Next to that, they should be pushing eachother.If that's not enough, Pennel's still there. Don't know if you could've drafted anyone better than that in the later rounds.

When in doubt, I generally look to what Porky has to say. He seems to be rather happy with the draft, so that's a big comfort.

Lastly... The Hundley pick was pure genius. To get a QB with such physical tools that late in the draft is an absolute steal.
Fan Shout
TheKanataThrilla (4m) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (20h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (20h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.