Of course it's rather early to say whether we'll actually need to replace our staff in 2010, as it is pending on how we perform.

Mike Holmgren has reiterated his desire to return in 2010,  and if we perform poorly, would anyone be amiable to seeing Holmgren return to the place that gave him his ring?

Honestly I'm hoping that Holmgren will ultimately be 1 year too late for a repeat superbowl ring. I hope the issue never has to come up as we emerge as a football dynasty once more. However, the alternatives must be considered.

---

If he goes anywhere, it will probably be to the 49's as their new GM.

Don't see it happening here.

He really got nothing done in Seattle of any significance, especially lately, as they just fizzled more and more. I think he should retire and enjoy the rest of his life with his family.

---

Agreed.

---

His last 4 years he has compiled a 36-28 record. I'm not sure that's floundering but when you go 4-12 I guess it's time to move on. I think Holmgren checked out after the 2007 season

---

I don't think the whole coach/GM thing has worked out for anyone to any real extent, so if he did come back I'd want to be as either HC or GM - not both.

---

In reading the headlines yesterday, I knew this would become a thread here.. ;)

Maybe Brett and Mike share the same thought process.. flip flop applesauce.. what should I do. :lol:

Wade Phillips.. beware.. If Mike wants to coach, Jerry would be attracted to such a name.

---

In the absolute worst division in football, with no new influx of talent to even shed some hope for future seasons. There is no way in hell I would give him a GM position.

---

Well, maybe the threat of Holmgren coming to GB in '10 will light a fire under MM's *** and he'll stop running twice and throwing on 3rd and 8 when we're in their red zone.

Competition is good for EVERYONE. When someone thinks their job is safe, they get lazy.

---

Dude looks burned out to me. Go home and enjoy your life and family.

---