Last one before the Packers 2025 preseason games start.
pff_mock_results - 2025-08-09T183313.633.png
You have insufficient rights to see the content.Packers strongly considering trading up for star C Jake Slaughter but he doesn't fall outside the top 15.
Packers then stay put,
1.21 CB HarrisHarris has true #1 CB potential but needs to clean some things up, he clearly enjoys the physical aspect of the game, but needs to make sure he's not going to get flagged and like most CBs his tackling technique could improve, but he sure doesn't lack the will to hit. He's best in man coverage, while in zone coverage, and can get stuck watching the QB a bit too much, and not following the receiver as much, also doesn't have the best hands (that's why he's on defense), but whiles he's not related to Al Harris, a similar playing style might be perfect for A.J. Harris, once that focuses on bump and run coverage, and locking up your guy one on one. Note Packers defensive coordinator Hafley also coached Richard Sherman in a similar bump and run, though more in cover 3 than man coverage, but surely Hafley system could be a good fit for a physical bump and run guy if he plays smart.
2.53 Packers trade back 5 spots, targeting a group of 3 DTs... and in those 5 picks, 3 Centers, 1 Safety and 1 DT are taken, including the DT that supposedly is the highest rated due to him being the best pass rusher, but despite being huge he doesn't focus on the run enough and Packers might actually prefer the DT they got over him, due to being more well rounded. If I had to pick her, I would still probably pick one of the 3 DTs that I'm targeting, which I think the Packers would like Georgia's Miller the best.
2.58 DT MillerPackers continue their collection of Georgia DTs, Miller is a very well rounded and used in multiple different interior DL roles, he doesn't have a ton of snaps as Georgia rotates their DTs more than most, but considering the limited pass rush snaps, his pressure numbers are pretty good. And Packers still need to improve their DT roles IMO.
3.85 DT OrangeSurprising Orange dropped further than expected, Orange plays "NT" (I'll explain the reason for the quotes in a bit) in the very pass heavy, Big 12 conference. But Iowa State runs a 3-3-5 scheme with 3 deep Safeties which helps the pass defense, but hurts the run defensive, especially since Iowa States LB have gotten decimated with injuries. But while Orange plays the "NT" position, he's not asked to play like a traditional NT style wise, as with pass heavy conference and the 3-3 scheme they need penetration more than run clogging. So I'd call Orange a DT instead of a NT, despite him playing NT and being 6'4" 325lbs.
That being said, Orange's quickness and hussle for a guy his size is absolutely amazing, and you can't teach that, and he combines it with great power, and he knows more pass rush moves that most. That being said, he doesn't have the lower arms, when pass rushing, his pads can get high, and he NEEDs to spend a week or two, one on one with Kenny Clark on technique of how to handle double teams... the effort is CLEARLY there, but the technique and understanding of how is best to beat it, clearly either hasn't been taught or learned yet. Heck, when scouting him, that might be my main focus, talking with his teammates and coaches and seeing if the coaches don't teach it, or don't teach it well, or who am I blaming for that horrible double team technique... who I blame (him or the coaches) would probably effect my draft grade on him.
But using Orange as a power pass rusher could be very interesting.
4.121 Honestly, I think the mid 120s is the sweet spot where I'm liking a ton of different guys, at least in the PFF simulation. If I had to pick here, I'd be arguing between Tennessee TE Kitselman, who's probably the best blocking TE in a while, and great soft hands, hasn't dropped a pass in his career, though not the most athletic, or one of Texas A&M starting OTs that are both in this range, for some reason PFF has RT Crownover graded higher than LT Zuhn. Zuhn has given up more sacks, but he's stated healthier, and has given up less pressures. Unfortunately the Lions did grab the WR I thought was best available. With trading back, the TE was taken but both OTs were still in play.
4.127 LT ZuhnZuhn has taken over 880 snaps in BOTH the last two seasons, giving up 2 sacks each season. Both only a total of 15 pressures this last season (2 sacks, 2 hits, 11 hurries). Honestly I don't see many holes in Zuhn's game, it's just that he's not nessarily elite in enough areas. He's never going to be elite run zone blocker, but Packers have moved to power man blocking mostly. Zuhn needs to work on improving his hands, but I much rather have that issue than a foot/legs issue, and his hands aren't horrible, they just need improvement on their placement and strength. With the Packers most likely letting LT Walker go via FA (or a tag and trade if the Packers think they can get value that way), this will leave Morgan, Belton and Zuhn competing for the LT spot (assuming they don't move Tom over).
Trade up: As I said, I think this mid 20s area is a sweet spot. And 49ers who had 3 picks in their area were willing to trade one away. Also, Packers lost a 2027 7th round pick to the Lions in an earlier trade, but got the 49ers 6th round pick here to make up for it. And one of the Lions picks went to the 49ers too.
4.128 LB GlaskerGlasker is an interesting combination of skills, which could make him a versatile playmaker, or a tweener without a real clear position, but he seems like he's becoming well rounded and should be able to play a LB role in the NFL.
Glasker was a high school WR/S and started college at S, but since has gained 40+ lbs and moved to LB (and with his frame, it looks like he could gain more weight if desired) , now supposedly at 6'4" 235 lb, he's got good coverage instincts, and length, and lead the entire Big 12 conference with tackles for loss with 14.5. The question for Glasker will be how is he able to hold up against the run in the NFL, as he doesn't appear to be the most physically, but the tackles for loss, length and athleticism could say otherwise.
For a whole there, conservative, rush only 4, and the rest play coverage schemes seemed to become the huge thing in the NFL, but the ever changing pendulum has seemed to start to switch the other way (especially in the NFC North) and getting more blitz happy. In theory, Glasker might be a best fit with either extreme, that asks him to stay in coverage, and/or surprise blitz a lot, as long as the OL can't consistently target him all game long, and tee off on him.
5.142 CB EveretteThere is a long break of having no CBs before him... so Everette consistently keeps getting picked before his PFF grade, averaging out at #140, so I actually got him a bit later (or basically exactly where he's picked) on average.
Plain and simple here, I just really love Everette's zone instincts at this value, he's never going to be the most athletic, and in one on one man coverage, he's going to have trouble, BUT almost the entire NFL has gotten away from man coverage anyways, as no team runs it 50% of the time, and I think only two were running it even 40% of the time anymore.
Everette probably won't ever be a #1 CB (how many 5th round picks are?), but make sure the scheme gives him Safety help over the top and allow him to play a zone and I think you might have a very good role player.
5.165 WR Nic Anderson Anderson who played at Oklahoma before this coming season at LSU, has not been consistent, as he's drops way too many of easy catches, but at the same time, he's routinely catches the extremely hard catches. Like the harder it is, the better he is, and the easier it is, the worse he is.
He's not expected to be track fast, with 4.5 speed, in his 6'4" 210 frame, but he's consistently been a deep threat averaging more than 20 yards per catch in 2023. Also a red zone treat with 10 TDs in 2023. Injuries basically took his entire 2024 season away.
Anderson clearly has untapped potential, but if he'll ever be able to become fully consistency is unclear, but I think it's worth a roll of the dice, and Packers currently have Watson, Doubs and Hardman as WR FAs, at the end of the season and switch Melton to CB, so they might need some more WR depth come 2026.