nerdmann
8 years ago

The Packers have drafted nine receivers since Rodgers' ascension to starter in 2008, the seventh-highest total in the NFL, but never have they sought a dominant No. 1 receiver such as Dez Bryant. Instead, they have collected upper-end volume -- Nelson, Cobb and Adams were all second-round picks -- to build their scheme and financial structure around the idea that a high-level whole will prove better than any one part.

Rob Demovsky  wrote:



It's becoming a proven system.

Adams is gonna be elite.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

It's becoming a proven system.

Adams is gonna be elite.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



The article just spoke to not drafting elite WR's and the first comment below is Adams who is the worst of the big 3 is going to be elite.

I really don't understand sometimes.

For me, I'll take a Dez Bryant type talent, not character, over what we have and fill in players around him. It makes no sense not to. We wouldn't go with a 2nd tier QB if we could...we're what we are because we have the best of the best at QB and that should be the idea at all positions.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


musccy
8 years ago

The article just spoke to not drafting elite WR's and the first comment below is Adams who is the worst of the big 3 is going to be elite.

I really don't understand sometimes.

For me, I'll take a Dez Bryant type talent, not character, over what we have and fill in players around him. It makes no sense not to. We wouldn't go with a 2nd tier QB if we could...we're what we are because we have the best of the best at QB and that should be the idea at all positions.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You need an elite QB to win a SB much more than you need an elite wr. The last 2 SB champs illustrate that.

Of course Megatron would be nice, but I'd put an elite QB, LT, CB all above WR on a priorities list.
nerdmann
8 years ago

You need an elite QB to win a SB much more than you need an elite wr. The last 2 SB champs illustrate that.

Of course Megatron would be nice, but I'd put an elite QB, LT, CB all above WR on a priorities list.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I'll take 2 or 3 very good guys over 1 "elite" guy every time.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

I'll take 2 or 3 very good guys over 1 "elite" guy every time.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.






UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Bigbyfan
8 years ago

...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.





Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.
blank
musccy
8 years ago

...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



It's a capped league. There are other roster spots. You're not going to be elite at all 24 positions on the field. If you're pretty darn good at most positions, with some elite sprinkled in then you're doing well. If this was baseball, and you're the Dodgers, fine, shoot for a HoFer at each position.

An elite WR isn't necessarily bad, but it doesn't need to be a top priority on a roster, and having 3-4 very good WRs is arguably a better alternative.
nerdmann
8 years ago

There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



Keep in mind, Uffda's definition of "elite" includes Jeff Janis.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
8 years ago

Keep in mind, Uffda's definition of "elite" includes Jeff Janis.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I don't often actually chuckle out loud - but this made me do just that. 👍
uffda udfa
8 years ago

There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



You make my case even stronger. What would we do if we committed that kind of space? Draft guys like Cobb and Nelson and not resign them and keep the pipeline full behind them. I still fail to see why you wouldn't want an elite WR? You want an elite QB, don't you? Oh, but that's different? It's hilarious how fiscally tight members here come when it comes to debating against our org's philosophy. It's mindboggling. You want the BEST possible player you can have. You want FOUR or FIVE elite WR's, if possible.

So, you guys are hoping Randall and Rollins are just good players not elite because it might cost too much to keep them if they're both phenomenal? The logic is stupefying. Honestly, I do think the Packers company line has done things to rational thinking people. I truly do.

I hope each and every draftee in this class and future class turns into a HOF player. I hope each one is so good that they command so much cap that we're getting comp picks like you wouldn't believe because we can't possibly keep them all.

James Jones. Ring a bell? He was merely a "good" WR from our group of non-elite WR's...did we keep him? Nope. We're going to have to let guys go whether they're stars, good, mediocre, or terrible. Give me ELITE.

Go back and read these posts and ask yourself if it makes any sense not to want as many elite players as you possibly can have at any position.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (36m) : I miss having Sam Shields.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Not that he's making excuses, just pointing it out
Zero2Cool (2h) : That's for dang sure. Make our erratic kicker have no excuse!
packerfanoutwest (15h) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (21h) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (23h) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (23h) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (28-Apr) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (28-Apr) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (28-Apr) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

28-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.