dfosterf
11 months ago
If this defense cannot stop 5 yards per carry, all the rest is complete bullshit.
beast
11 months ago

If this defense cannot stop 5 yards per carry, all the rest is complete bullshit.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



I feel like that's off topic (just mentioning because it's Zero2Cool's post and he likes staying on topic) but it's also extremely true. 

I also think we might be seeing something different and more aggressive upfront with so many power Edge and power 3-4 DE that might not fit the normal 4-3 DE nor 4-3 DT roles... maybe Packers planning on staying in the 3-4 formation but actually running some sort of 5-2? Just speculation on my part.


But back on topic, there seems to be four groups of terms.of rebuilding (or whatever you want to call this)

​​​​​​Going from lowest to highest

1) Tanking - when you're selling off players and trying to get the best draft pick possible, like the Bears purposely sold all their good pieces off trying to get the #1 draft pick. But at minimum, trying really hard to lose and get a top 3 to top 5 Draft pick.

2) Rebuilding or Total rebuild like the Lions have done, where they basic limts start cultures all over, but aren't necessarily trying to ever get a top 5 Draft pick for it.

3) The one that the Packers are currently in and were debating over what to call it, but my point is almost all of us seem to agree the Packers are in this one, we just disagree on the proper terminology of this one. But the Packers tore down the offense weapons and building them back up again, also building back up the DL and have attempted to rebuild the OL in pass years and Gute is hoping they finally develop this year.

4) Reloading - like the Chiefs keep doing with their receiving core, usually this is done with high draft picks and FAs.
​​​​​​
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
11 months ago
If you are starting a new QB, and have to add several new guys both on offense and defense, to me that would be considered a rebuild. 
But every year you have to "rebuild" to a certain extent.  You lose guys to old age, free agency and injury. And if the guys you lose are "star" players, those are hard to replace and might take several seasons (if even then) to replace. 
Look at how many teams have been searching for a great starting QB, only to still be searching. We have been lucky to have 2 over the last 30 years .
We hope that LOVE will be the next great GB QB . But no one knows for sure.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
11 months ago

If you are starting a new QB, and have to add several new guys both on offense and defense, to me that would be considered a rebuild. 
But every year you have to "rebuild" to a certain extent.  You lose guys to old age, free agency and injury. And if the guys you lose are "star" players, those are hard to replace and might take several seasons (if even then) to replace. 
Look at how many teams have been searching for a great starting QB, only to still be searching. We have been lucky to have 2 over the last 30 years .
We hope that LOVE will be the next great GB QB . But no one knows for sure.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Keeping the same system tho, carring over OL and RBs.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
11 months ago

If this defense cannot stop 5 yards per carry, all the rest is complete bullshit.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



This defense has held up for than it has let us down. But yes, gotta shore that up.. 
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
11 months ago

This defense has held up for than it has let us down. But yes, gotta shore that up.. 

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


Yes, if you believe the lies that you hear... and are trying to presented as factual.
​​​​​
​​​​
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 months ago

​​​​​​Rebuilding is never any teams preferred choice... it's only done because something has to be reset, and you just brought up many of the items that needed to be reset, QB, WR, and Salary Cap. 

Originally Posted by: beast 


I kind of disagree here. I think teams like Seahawks and Rams elected to "rebuild", but maybe to your point though, the teams were kind of left with no choice? Both shipped off or cut multiple veterans to free up salary cap space or pick up draft picks. The Packers had no choice to but to go younger at WR, even though they did sign a free agent back in 2022 who flopped out. 
​​​​​

And you talk about me not being able to accept other people viewpoints... no one is stretching a word, they just have a different believe of the words meaning and usage. 

You asked, we answered, you don't our answers and you criticize them... be overly anal about the unimportant semantics if you wish... but the reality is that they've clearly attempted to rebuild the offense OL depth over past years and the WRs and TEs the last two years. ​​​​​​

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don't what your answers? I'm happy to read the answers, but I don't have to agree with them. I'm using the definitions provided as I understand them and it feels like even though the definition is laid, there's some square peg into round hole action going on. What's your problem with my view on that? What did I do wrong now holier than thou, sir? It seems every time I post, you gotta come at me for something and just make me not want to even visit the website. 

The more definitions of "rebuild" the more I'm convinced the Packers are not rebuilding. They do not have a new front office, they do not have a new coaching staff, they are starting their hand picked QB who sat on the bench for three years, they didn't cut/trade a bunch of veterans and it just doesn't feel like a rebuild --- BASED ON THE DEFINITIONS PROVIDED. But what do we call what they're doing if it's not a rebuild? How is what the Packers are doing different than anything they've done in the past (minus the QB spot)? So is every team rebuilding? 

If they traded guys like David Bakhtiari, Preston Smith and Rashan Gary for some draft picks, I could buy the "rebuild" narrative even though they didn't replace front office/ coaching staff.  It's weird, TO ME (this is MY opinion, no one get butt cheese on me here) it feels the Seahawks rebuild in 2022, but the Packers in 2023 just kind of feels same ole same ole with the exception of the QB. 🤷‍♂️
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 months ago

Yeah, I have to agree with beast here. What we're currently seeing I would classify as a rebuild. Not tanking to get the #1 pick or whatever. But the signs of a rebuild are pretty clear to me:
1. Trading the best two players on the team the past two years for draft capital
2. Not signing significant free agents this year and letting a few significant ones go the past couple of years - freeing up cap space for future years and absorbing the cap hit they've been putting off with contract restructures. This year it's quite clear that they're trying to clear $ from the books and get some comp picks in 2024.
3. Completely revamping the WR and TE positions

Sure, there isn't a new GM and coaching staff in place, but I don't think that is required for a rebuild. If anything, I think the Packers intended to start the rebuild sooner - new coaching staff in 2019, new QB in 2021 or so, but then Rodgers was playing too well for them to fully commit to the transition plan. Two straight MVP seasons will do that. 

But yeah, I don't think you can really "retool" after a losing season where you miss the playoffs. If that's the case the Bears and Lions are "retooling" practically every year.

All that said, I don't think a rebuild means the Packers necessarily will be bad this year. If they have done this well, they could be competitive this year. This largely depends on how brightly Jordan Love shines when the lights turn on.

I also think the Packers have enough core players that are young (Love, Watson, Gary, Runyan, Tom, Dillion, Walker) or in their prime (Jenkins, Clark, Alexander, Douglas, Campbell) that they can rebuild without completely starting over.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



You say they are rebuilding, but yet have a core. I think, for me, if you're rebuilding, you don't have a core and thus are rebuilding core. You listed off more solid players that I just feel a team that is rebuilding would not have. 

⚠ ⚠ ⚠ I'm gonna go super pedantic and semantic here. ⚠ ⚠ ⚠
The definition of rebuilding is to build something again after it has been destroyed. Being the pedantic person I am, I don't think the Packers were destroyed. I think they're just doing some remodeling and partaking in the constant evolution of an NFL roster. 🤷‍♂️
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 months ago

I feel like that's off topic (just mentioning because it's Zero2Cool's post and he likes staying on topic) but it's also extremely true. ​​​​​​

Originally Posted by: beast 


Haha, thanks! This crappy software still allows us to split posts into new topic though! 
UserPostedImage
beast
11 months ago

The more definitions of "rebuild" the more I'm convinced the Packers are not rebuilding. They do not have a new front office, they do not have a new coaching staff, they are starting their hand picked QB who sat on the bench for three years, they didn't cut/trade a bunch of veterans and it just doesn't feel like a rebuild --- BASED ON THE DEFINITIONS PROVIDED.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


1) That's based on YOUR definition provided, the entire point is that different people can have different definitions or uses of the same exact word.

2) You claim the Seahawks and Rams elected to "rebuild"... and yet they have the same Front Office, the Same coaches (other than Rams changed up some coaches but they have been doing that just about every single year). So you claim the Packers can't be rebuilding because they don't meet your definition, then how can you claim the Rams and Seahawks are, when they also aren't meeting your definition? Why are other teams getting an exemption from the definition? You say Packers are starting the QB that sat on their bench for 3 years... and so are the Seahawks....

3) Packers didn't cut or trade a whole bunch of FAs, because they didn't have to, they were mostly FAs... and you can't cut nor trade a FA. Interesting how they didn't have to cut them, but they were all naturally FAs at the same exact time, almost like it was planned ahead of time. And yet, you're using that as proof that it wasn't planned. Maybe it was planned so well, you just didn't notice.
​​​​​

I kind of disagree here. I think teams like Seahawks and Rams elected to "rebuild", but maybe to your point though, the teams were kind of left with no choice? Both shipped off or cut multiple veterans to free up salary cap space or pick up draft picks. The Packers had no choice to but to go younger at WR, even though they did sign a free agent back in 2022 who flopped out.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Exactly, they didn't want to rebuild, but the results of their aggressive actions in previous years (aggressive to salary cap) gave them no other good choices, just like the Packers. And I believe Gute has stated a couple years ago, going cap heavy now means they have to make it up in the future, which is rebuilding of the cap space. So I think all these teams elected to go for Super Bowls, and after a number of years, knew they had to stop and rebuild the cap space.


​​​


But what do we call what they're doing if it's not a rebuild? How is what the Packers are doing different than anything they've done in the past (minus the QB spot)? So is every team rebuilding? 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

No, lots of teams are trying to improve their team and get into the playoffs now, whole Packers are trying to build a new offensive foundation, with other than OL, new everything on offense, and build the chemistry of the offense unit.

And I don't know this, but I believe we'll see a shift in offensive scheme, as the Packers scheme has been described as a hybrid of what LaFleaur likes and what Rodgers liked and kept from the McCarthy era... and now it'll probably be all LaFleaur wide zone scheme. And I believe they talked about the coaches missing the combine to work on scheme. Also with the Packers bringing in some pass rushing 3-4 DEs, I wonder if the defensive scheme might be changing a bit too.



If they traded guys like David Bakhtiari, Preston Smith and Rashan Gary for some draft picks, I could buy the "rebuild" narrative even though they didn't replace front office/ coaching staff.  It's weird, TO ME (this is MY opinion, no one get butt cheese on me here) it feels the Seahawks rebuild in 2022, but the Packers in 2023 just kind of feels same ole same ole with the exception of the QB. 🤷‍♂️

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

They traded Rodgers and Adams, while Rams openly said Stafford, Cooper and Donald were not going to be traded no matter the offer.


And like I said with the 4 stages, I think we are all agreeing the Packers are in stage 3, we just disagree on what to call the stage 3. 

I thought your phrase of "remodeling" fit well, but I don't hear that phrase in the normal football talk.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (40m) : @ProFootballTalk Jaylen Warren: Steelers' special teams coach has discussed Justin Fields returning kicks.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Season officially ending tonight for Bucks ... sad face
Zero2Cool (9h) : Giannis Antetokounmpo is listed as out for tonight's game.
dfosterf (14h) : Surprisingly low initially is my guess cap wise, but gonna pay the piper after that
dfosterf (14h) : The number on Love is going to be brutal.
Zero2Cool (14h) : May 3rd. Extension day for Jordan Love. (soonest)
Zero2Cool (1-May) : USFL MVP QB Alex McGough moved to WR. So that's why no WR drafted!
earthquake (1-May) : Packers draft starters at safety ever few years. Collins, Clinton-Dix, Savage
beast (1-May) : Why can't the rookies be a day 1 starter? Especially when we grabbed 3 of them at the position
dfosterf (1-May) : Not going to be shocked if Gilmore goes to the Lions.
dfosterf (1-May) : I hear you dhazer, but my guess would be Gilmore Colts and Howard Vikings from what little has been reported.
Mucky Tundra (30-Apr) : S learn from McKinney who learns from Hafley who learns from the fans. Guaranteed Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : could*
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Safeties should learn from Xavier.
dhazer (29-Apr) : And what about grabbing a Gilmore or Howard at CB ? Those are all Free Agents left
dhazer (29-Apr) : out of curiosity do they try and sign Simmons or Hyde to let these young safeties learn from, they can't be day 1 starters.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : I miss having Sam Shields.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Not that he's making excuses, just pointing it out
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : That's for dang sure. Make our erratic kicker have no excuse!
packerfanoutwest (28-Apr) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (28-Apr) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (28-Apr) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (28-Apr) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

1-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1-May / Packers Draft Threads / dfosterf

30-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

28-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

28-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.