uffda udfa
8 years ago

We lost a true #1 WR:

1500 Yards,
13 TDs,
6 DPI calls for 129,
ZERO fumbles
a 2.7 drop rate only bested by a handful of WRs,
7th in YAC,
with only 2 penalties in 3 years for 10 yards,
repeat 2 penalties in 3 years,
and a blocking fool and
one who TWICE took less to stay in GB

and what Steve said [“that little push off he gets away with all the time, working his way through traffic, beating jams”]

and what Nerd said [Getting his feet down in bounds. Going up for the ball, sacrificing his body over the middle, catching with his hands. Meeting the ball at it's high point. Knowing the whole route tree. Intangible communication with Aaron”]

and what Tundra said [What about that subtle little head fake Jordy does?]

and to add to Nerd, Aaron Rodgers throws those freakin’ balls out of bounds 25-30 yards downfield on purpose and Jordy is laying out and catchin’ em. UNPRECEDENTED!!!

Did ya see him race down on Lacy’s 56 yrd screen pass TD against Bears to block?

Plus and absolute stud leader in the room and all around great guy, a man!

A #2 WR? LOL, damn, Is a #1 WR some fictional unattainable part of some wet-dreamed wayward NFL perfection fantasy fu(k. LOL Damn!

Jordy might be a #2 if his ACL is torn and Jerry Rice in his prime is on the team.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Jordy doesn't think of himself as a 1. We apparently offered Greg Jennings MORE money than we offered Jordy BEFORE Jordy signed his deal later down the road. Nobody thought of Greg Jennings as a 1. Jordy is finely tuned to work within this offense...heck, he might be a better FIT than a true #1 but he's not a #1 WR just because you get excited about 60 yard bombs on your TV screen.

Heckuva player...will be missed. Not paid anywhere near what a true 1 would be paid. I think the foolishness ends with that factual data. I can just hear the spin...he gave a hometown discount...maybe, but not the difference between what he took and what a true 1 would usually get.

EDIT: I would add that Jordy Nelson owes a debt of gratitude to Jarrett Bush. If the Packers had lost that SB to Pittsburgh, Jordy Nelson would be one of the biggest goats, if not the biggest, in Wisconsin sports history. He had some unbelievably bad drops in that game...3 of them, and then missed a TD which wasn't considered a drop. Yes, he still put up big numbers but he absolutely screwed the pooch on a couple of balls that could've cost us the Lombardi. In the biggest game he wasn't big time for us.

Nobody has been with Aaron longer than Jordy has...there on the first day Rodgers was starting QB through his injury yesterday. All those years together are impossible to replicate with anyone else. Of course, Jordy and Aaron have a special connection they've been working together for 7 years unlike the rest of the guys we have who have barely been here. Not many QB's and WR's are together for 7 seasons. Any QB and WR working together that long are going to be able to do the nuances Jordy and Aaron do. Jordy isn't special because he's Jordy Nelson...he's special because he's spent 7 years learning Aaron Rodgers as Aaron has learned him in return. A beautiful reciprocal relationship but not because Jordy is a #1 WR.

I think this quote from Troy Polamalu after losing the SB sums up Jordy and our receiving corps at the time:

Steelers strong safety Troy Polamalu was asked what made Nelson so dangerous on this particular day.

"I don't think we worried about any of their receivers on an individual basis," he said earnestly, pausing. "It helps when you have a really good quarterback."

Translation...there was no #1 guy to look out for as none of them were #1 guys... Rodgers just makes guys look better. I'm not going to worry too much. As I said from the get go...this is exciting...chance for a new star to be born in Green Bay and we do have the league MVP.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Barfarn
8 years ago

We lost a true #1 WR:

1500 Yards,
13 TDs,
6 DPI calls for 129,
ZERO fumbles
a 2.7 drop rate only bested by a handful of WRs,
7th in YAC,
with only 2 penalties in 3 years for 10 yards,
repeat 2 penalties in 3 years,
and a blocking fool and
one who TWICE took less to stay in GB

and what Steve said [“that little push off he gets away with all the time, working his way through traffic, beating jams”]

and what Nerd said [Getting his feet down in bounds. Going up for the ball, sacrificing his body over the middle, catching with his hands. Meeting the ball at it's high point. Knowing the whole route tree. Intangible communication with Aaron”]

and what Tundra said [What about that subtle little head fake Jordy does?]

and to add to Nerd, Aaron Rodgers throws those freakin’ balls out of bounds 25-30 yards downfield on purpose and Jordy is laying out and catchin’ em. UNPRECEDENTED!!!

Did ya see him race down on Lacy’s 56 yrd screen pass TD against Bears to block?

Plus and absolute stud leader in the room and all around great guy, a man!

A #2 WR? LOL, damn, Is a #1 WR some fictional unattainable part of some wet-dreamed wayward NFL perfection fantasy fu(k. LOL Damn!

Jordy might be a #2 if his ACL is torn and Jerry Rice in his prime is on the team.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



And what all_about_da_packers said [Sorry i forgot your post ]!

And now Jordy has said he's gonna help the yougins. This guy wont take a snap and he'll get the 2015 team an extra 800 yards and 5 TDs and eliminate 6 INTs and make guys better that'll have a shot at takin' his job next year. Now THAT is a #1 receiver.





uffda udfa
8 years ago

And what all_about_da_packers said [Sorry i forgot your post ]!

And now Jordy has said he's gonna help the yougins. This guy wont take a snap and he'll get the 2015 team an extra 800 yards and 5 TDs and eliminate 6 INTs and make guys better that'll have a shot at takin' his job next year. Now THAT is a #1 receiver.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Being a great guy and leader and being a #1 WR has no correlation. I'm thrilled and wouldn't expect any less of him.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


earthquake
8 years ago
So how many #1 WRs are there if Jordy Nelson isn't one of them? Two or three in the entire NFL? Is this one of those retarded comparing to perfection rather than reality things? Might as well say he's not a #0 WR, would make as much sense.
blank
uffda udfa
8 years ago

So how many #1 WRs are there if Jordy Nelson isn't one of them? Two or three in the entire NFL? Is this one of those retarded comparing to perfection rather than reality things? Might as well say he's not a #0 WR, would make as much sense.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



Of course, there's subjectivity involved in this. I asked a question to this stance that Jordy is a #1. RC18 had similar numbers from the slot. Is he a #1 due to his stats? I also spoke to Larry Centers catching 100 balls as RB....he wasn't a #1 WR. Jordy is not a guy the defense coordinator has nightmares over. Is he constantly doubled or even triple covered because he's such a threat? We know there are WR's who are even when they have talent opposite them. Jordy is not one of those guys. He's a function of 7 years with Rodgers. Disputing that is just blindness to me.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


earthquake
8 years ago
You'll have to define what you actually mean by #1 WR, because it's clear you think it's something different than nearly any other reasonable person does. Typically, a team's #1 WR is the WR that gets the most production in a given year. Jordy Nelson is most definitely that. That's a simplistic view of it though, because some teams do not have a #1 WR that would be even the #2 or #3 on other teams. The Packers do not fall into that category, Jordy Nelson would be a starter, and would produce on many teams in the NFL.

Randal Cobb is borderline, he would probably start on a lot of teams in the NFL but he might start as the #2 rather than the #1.

Now, if you want to say Jordy Nelson is not an elite WR, that's something that I would say you could at least make a case for. Even then you would have to define what you mean by elite (top 5 currently, all time, etc). But not a #1 WR? That's simpy ridiculous. Again, if Jordy Nelson is not a #1 WR, how many are there in the NFL and who are they?
blank
Smokey
8 years ago
😢 😢 😢

Crying will not heal Jordy Nelson and bring him back this season. We must look to the next Starter at WR for the Packers. Montgomery seems to that man. Let's give him our full support and quit wining over something over which we have no control.

[cheers] [cheers] [cheers]
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

You'll have to define what you actually mean by #1 WR, because it's clear you think it's something different than nearly any other reasonable person does. Typically, a team's #1 WR is the WR that gets the most production in a given year. Jordy Nelson is most definitely that. That's a simplistic view of it though, because some teams do not have a #1 WR that would be even the #2 or #3 on other teams. The Packers do not fall into that category, Jordy Nelson would be a starter, and would produce on many teams in the NFL.

Randal Cobb is borderline, he would probably start on a lot of teams in the NFL but he might start as the #2 rather than the #1.

Now, if you want to say Jordy Nelson is not an elite WR, that's something that I would say you could at least make a case for. Even then you would have to define what you mean by elite (top 5 currently, all time, etc). But not a #1 WR? That's simpy ridiculous. Again, if Jordy Nelson is not a #1 WR, how many are there in the NFL and who are they?

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



I've given you my opinion on what constitutes a #1 WR. Davante is now our nominal #1 WR. A guy who gets the most stats for a particular team is nominally the #1 WR, but is he a true #1 WR? You ignored my argument, completely, for why I don't think he's a 1 and then came back next post and ask me to explain my rationale. Again, is any defensive coordinator up at night concerned about what Jordy Nelson is going to do to his defense the same way he would over Dez Bryant, Calvin Johnson, Odell Beckham, or guys like Randy Moss...or our own Sterling Sharpe. The guy. Jordy is not THE GUY... heck, it is and was a major debate over who you'd want to keep him or Cobb if you could only choose one. The issue wasn't that they were both 1's...the issue that caused the debate is neither of them were.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


earthquake
8 years ago

I've given you my opinion on what constitutes a #1 WR. Davante is now our nominal #1 WR. A guy who gets the most stats for a particular team is nominally the #1 WR, but is he a true #1 WR? You ignored my argument, completely, for why I don't think he's a 1 and then came back next post and ask me to explain my rationale. Again, is any defensive coordinator up at night concerned about what Jordy Nelson is going to do to his defense the same way he would over Dez Bryant, Calvin Johnson, Odell Beckham, or guys like Randy Moss...or our own Sterling Sharpe. The guy. Jordy is not THE GUY... heck, it is and was a major debate over who you'd want to keep him or Cobb if you could only choose one. The issue wasn't that they were both 1's...the issue that caused the debate is neither of them were.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I ignored your "argument" because it is preposterous, none of your points can be either proved or disproved in an objective manner. Your reasoning is subjective nonsense built on nothing but conjecture. The level to which DC's game plan for Jordy Nelson is impossible to know and certainly not something you can gleam by watching the game on TV.

Anyway, it's clear that you mean elite WR when you say #1 WR, so I guess we'll simply have to disagree with how we use these terms.

The argument with Nelson VS Cobb was do you keep a #1 WR in his prime or do you go for a younger player who probably hasn't hit his ceiling yet, with the potential to be your #1 WR for a longer period of time. Cobb is 25 years old and could yet develop into a better WR/have a better career than Nelson. He'll get his shot to establish himself as a #1 this year, it will be interesting to see what he does with that opportunity.
blank
uffda udfa
8 years ago

I ignored your "argument" because it is preposterous, none of your points can be either proved or disproved in an objective manner. Your reasoning is subjective nonsense built on nothing but conjecture. The level to which DC's game plan for Jordy Nelson is impossible to know and certainly not something you can gleam by watching the game on TV.

Anyway, it's clear that you mean elite WR when you say #1 WR, so I guess we'll simply have to disagree with how we use these terms.

The argument with Nelson VS Cobb was do you keep a #1 WR in his prime or do you go for a younger player who probably hasn't hit his ceiling yet, with the potential to be your #1 WR for a longer period of time. Cobb is 25 years old and could yet develop into a better WR/have a better career than Nelson. He'll get his shot to establish himself as a #1 this year, it will be interesting to see what he does with that opportunity.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



Not preposterous...you just don't like it because it nullifies the idea Jordy is a 1. He's our 1...no argument...or was.

If Randall puts up same kind of numbers this year as last and no one else comes close is RC18 then a #1 WR or OUR #1 WR? There is a difference and it isn't semantics. You know exactly what the difference is.

I've also typed on this forum that Jordy and his agent don't even think he's a true #1 WR. If they did he wouldn't be paid what Randall is a year later as a slot guy. Also, the Packers org wouldn't have offered Greg Jennings more than what Jordy got when Greg Jennings wasn't even a true #1 WR. Jordy and Greg Jennings...compare them at their best here. Much difference? How'd ol' Greg do in Minnesota? Did you find out that he wasn't really a #1 WR rather that he was just OUR #1 WR. It's pretty simple. I don't know why you're arguing...I like Jordy, a lot. He's just not this incredibly elite WR that you seem to think he is even though you somewhat admit he isn't elite but only by a hair. Put Jordy in Minnesota...he'll have the Greg Jennings outcome where Dez Bryant would not.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (7h) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (7h) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (9h) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (9h) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (9h) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (10h) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (10h) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (21h) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (22h) : damn those vikings
beast (23h) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (23h) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (23h) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (23h) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (23h) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.