dyeah_gb
8 years ago

All I saw was Janis make plays where he had a very simple route to run. This offense doesn't rely on simple routes; it is a read and react offense that requires precision, timing, and knowing what A-Rod is seeing and thinking.

Janis showed on a couple of occasions that is not his cup of tea. Janis had a wonderful game tonight, and stepped up HUGE. He deserves more reps to gain experience.

But he still has a ways to go. That said, when we absolutely needed him at WR, he stepped up. He also stepped up as a special teams player.

At this stage given what we have seen, I think it would be foolish to count out Janis eventually having a role at WR for us. He's earned the benefit of the doubt after this season.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



I agree with what you said here but I want Mike McCarthy and OC fired if Janis and Abby were not starting during the regular season because the offense doesn't rely on simple routes. Packers were stuck without Jordy Nelson and Ty Montgomery and should have adjusted to the talent that was available on the offense. I think yesterday's game showed that if they simplified the game plan, the pack could have avoided the historically bad offense toward the end of the regular season.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
(0:55 - 4th) (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass deep left to J.Janis to ARZ 36 for 60 yards (T.Jefferson)
(0:00 - 4th) Jeff Janis Pass From Aaron Rodgers for 41 Yrds

I'm pretty sure receiving 101 yards in one drive has not been done often, if ever before, lol.

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

(0:55 - 4th) (Shotgun) A.Rodgers pass deep left to J.Janis to ARZ 36 for 60 yards (T.Jefferson)
(0:00 - 4th) Jeff Janis Pass From Aaron Rodgers for 41 Yrds

I'm pretty sure receiving 101 yards in one drive has not been done often, if ever before, lol.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Janis would've been canonized for all time had we won the game. Too bad for him.

Here's our brilliant HC on JJ after the game:

“He’s just a young man that needs to play." Gee, MM, thanks for playing him during the regular season when our offense was detestable. He makes two big plays vs. SD and then gets relegated to the pine.

Will NEVER understand playing James Jones over Jeff Janis. 50 catches, James. 50. 3 a game...while a guy who makes huge plays and has speed just sits and watches a guy putt it out on the 18th with no shot at winning.

I like what Michael Rodney said of Packersnotes.com... Janis and Abby were probably an upgrade over Cobb and Adams. By the looks of the O yesterday vs. most of the season it's kinda hard to disagree not that it was fantastic yesterday.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
8 years ago

Janis would've been canonized for all time had we won the game. Too bad for him.

Here's our brilliant HC on JJ after the game:

“He’s just a young man that needs to play." Gee, MM, thanks for playing him during the regular season when our offense was detestable. He makes two big plays vs. SD and then gets relegated to the pine.

Will NEVER understand playing James Jones over Jeff Janis. 50 catches, James. 50. 3 a game...while a guy who makes huge plays and has speed just sits and watches a guy putt it out on the 18th with no shot at winning.

I like what Michael Rodney said of Packersnotes.com... Janis and Abby were probably an upgrade over Cobb and Adams. By the looks of the O yesterday vs. most of the season it's kinda hard to disagree not that it was fantastic yesterday.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If Janis could do that consistently, he would have been playing that entire time.

They tried to get him in there a number of times during the regular season, if you'll recall. Dude couldn't catch a cold. Finally they figured out that he needs to be facing the QB, and they worked around that. He did OK, but if you can't figure out why Jones started over Janis... Well, we all know how smart you are. 🤣
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

If Janis could do that consistently, he would have been playing that entire time.

They tried to get him in there a number of times during the regular season, if you'll recall. Dude couldn't catch a cold. Finally they figured out that he needs to be facing the QB, and they worked around that. He did OK, but if you can't figure out why Jones started over Janis... Well, we all know how smart you are. 🤣

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I would counter that Abbrederis needed to play more, too, but didn't. Why? Same reason Janis didn't.

Honestly, how many opportunities did Janis get vs. Davante Adams? Davante did nil with his opportunities. 17 was targeted 21 times one game. Was Janis targeted 21 times all regular season? Nope...not even close. So, your contention he was given opportunities is a fallacy. He wasn't.

Davante was targeted 92 times on the season. Produced 1 TD and less than 500 yards. That's P A T H E T I C. Davante was targeted TWENTY ONE TIMES vs. Detroit. That's 9 more than Janis had all season. Davante produced 79 yards on those 21 targets. Janis produced that many yards on four targets vs. SD.

Janis was targeted 12 times all regular season. 11 in the Cardinals playoff game.

You tell me why we played Davante and James as much as we did and ignored Jeff Janis? Your answer for why Janis didn't play used in the context of why Davante did play makes no sense.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
8 years ago

I would counter that Abbrederis needed to play more, too, but didn't. Why? Same reason Janis didn't.

Honestly, how many opportunities did Janis get vs. Davante Adams? Davante did nil with his opportunities. 17 was targeted 21 times one game. Was Janis targeted 21 times all regular season? Nope...not even close. So, your contention he was given opportunities is a fallacy. He wasn't.

Davante was targeted 92 times on the season. Produced 1 TD and less than 500 yards. That's P A T H E T I C. Davante was targeted TWENTY ONE TIMES vs. Detroit. That's 9 more than Janis had all season. Davante produced 79 yards on those 21 targets. Janis produced that many yards on four targets vs. SD.

Janis was targeted 12 times all regular season. 11 in the Cardinals playoff game.

You tell me why we played Davante and James as much as we did and ignored Jeff Janis? Your answer for why Janis didn't play used in the context of why Davante did play makes no sense.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



We get it, you're obsessed with Janis.

Fact is, he got more opportunity than Abbrederis, but he is unable to catch the ball unless facing the QB. He did look better in this game, but that is dude to 1 Aaron once again using proper mechanics and 2 continued practice and development as a player.

Hopefully by TC, he will be adequate to get even more playing time.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

We get it, you're obsessed with Janis.

Fact is, he got more opportunity than Abbrederis, but he is unable to catch the ball unless facing the QB. He did look better in this game, but that is dude to 1 Aaron once again using proper mechanics and 2 continued practice and development as a player.

Hopefully by TC, he will be adequate to get even more playing time.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Zero obsession. You make crazy unfounded assertions all the time and then just drop them when confronted with the fallacy of your arguments. The labels you throw out are as tired as your expletives.

I asked some simple things in reply to your (wrong) assertion that Janis had his opportunities. I asked why Davante continued getting his when he did nothing with the ones he was getting. Those are simple and more than fair questions only to be greeted by your incorrect personal characterizations followed by your wrong football characterizations.

My "obsession" with Janis applies equally to Abbrederis. BOTH should've been playing much more than they were and getting opportunities. Aaron even lobbied for Abby and he got ZERO snaps the following game. I do think Aaron isn't particularly fond of Janis for whatever the reason but Janis makes plays James Jones and Davante Adams can't and can only dream about.

Oh, and for the record, not Nerd speak, Abby had MORE opportunity than Janis...he had more targets during the regular season. 16 to 12. Abby was injured for a portion of the season while Janis was not but to you Abby got less opportunity. Incorrect. 0-3 in your reply.

Both should've had gotten more of the targets that went to Davante Adams and James Jones.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
8 years ago

Zero obsession. You make crazy unfounded assertions all the time and then just drop them when confronted with the fallacy of your arguments. The labels you throw out are as tired as your expletives.

I asked some simple things in reply to your (wrong) assertion that Janis had his opportunities. I asked why Davante continued getting his when he did nothing with the ones he was getting. Those are simple and more than fair questions only to be greeted by your incorrect personal characterizations followed by your wrong football characterizations.

My "obsession" with Janis applies equally to Abbrederis. BOTH should've been playing much more than they were and getting opportunities. Aaron even lobbied for Abby and he got ZERO snaps the following game. I do think Aaron isn't particularly fond of Janis for whatever the reason but Janis makes plays James Jones and Davante Adams can't and can only dream about.

Oh, and for the record, not Nerd speak, Abby had MORE opportunity than Janis...he had more targets during the regular season. 16 to 12. Abby was injured for a portion of the season while Janis was not but to you Abby got less opportunity. Incorrect. 0-3 in your reply.

Both should've had gotten more of the targets that went to Davante Adams and James Jones.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Abby got more time, because he's a better football player. They were trying to force Janis in there, but he clearly was not ready. Earlier this season, Janis was a drop machine.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

Abby got more time, because he's a better football player. They were trying to force Janis in there, but he clearly was not ready. Earlier this season, Janis was a drop machine.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



A drop machine? Nerd... post after post after post you post flat out wrong information. It's more than a trend with you. Honestly, where are you coming up with the things you post? Clearly, you're just making things up.

Would you like to know how many drops Janis had? ONE.

Abby certainly might be a better football player but he doesn't have what Janis has as far as size, strength and speed.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
8 years ago
Just my guess. But the reason I think Janis didn't get the snaps or opportunities has less to do with route running or being able to catch. I believe it had to do with blocking. WR on this team need to be able to block and Janis didn't have that experience coming in. Abberderis did so it was easier for him to bust into the lineup once healthy.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11h) : Jordan Love CAN sign an extension as of today. Might tak weeks/months though
TheKanataThrilla (11h) : Packers decline 5th year option for Stokes
Mucky Tundra (15h) : @ProFootballTalk Jaylen Warren: Steelers' special teams coach has discussed Justin Fields returning kicks.
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Season officially ending tonight for Bucks ... sad face
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Giannis Antetokounmpo is listed as out for tonight's game.
dfosterf (2-May) : Surprisingly low initially is my guess cap wise, but gonna pay the piper after that
dfosterf (2-May) : The number on Love is going to be brutal.
Zero2Cool (2-May) : May 3rd. Extension day for Jordan Love. (soonest)
Zero2Cool (1-May) : USFL MVP QB Alex McGough moved to WR. So that's why no WR drafted!
earthquake (1-May) : Packers draft starters at safety ever few years. Collins, Clinton-Dix, Savage
beast (1-May) : Why can't the rookies be a day 1 starter? Especially when we grabbed 3 of them at the position
dfosterf (1-May) : Not going to be shocked if Gilmore goes to the Lions.
dfosterf (1-May) : I hear you dhazer, but my guess would be Gilmore Colts and Howard Vikings from what little has been reported.
Mucky Tundra (30-Apr) : S learn from McKinney who learns from Hafley who learns from the fans. Guaranteed Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : could*
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Safeties should learn from Xavier.
dhazer (29-Apr) : And what about grabbing a Gilmore or Howard at CB ? Those are all Free Agents left
dhazer (29-Apr) : out of curiosity do they try and sign Simmons or Hyde to let these young safeties learn from, they can't be day 1 starters.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : I miss having Sam Shields.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Not that he's making excuses, just pointing it out
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : That's for dang sure. Make our erratic kicker have no excuse!
packerfanoutwest (28-Apr) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (28-Apr) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (28-Apr) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (28-Apr) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

2-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

1-May / Packers Draft Threads / dfosterf

30-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

28-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

28-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.