wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago

Yeah....the Lions played SOOOO great! 5 field goals.....not touchdowns.
Plus as was shown, the first hands to the face was verified.
I understand Sanders though. All his years wasted...I mean, playing for the lowly Lions. He wants to see them win SOMETHING while he’s still alive.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



I used to feel this way but as I watch games you just don't see a receiver who is going to break away from the defender when the defender close enough for a PI penalty in order to prevent a big play. They do happen but it's not typical.

Do defenders grab the receiver? Yes all the time. Is it 20, 30 or 40 yards down field? No it's within 10-15 yards of the LOS. That's where the double moves come in. Is there PI 20,30 yards down field? Yes but the defender has to be within an arms length of the receiver to PI. I am ok with DPI being a 5 or 10 yards penalty and automatic 1st down.

I guess we can look to the college game as a reference. I don't watch many college games but I don't see the abuse you are concerned about being a major issue.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
4 years ago
One Packers fan, a Yooper from Iron Mountain Michigan, didn't fare so well when he was in Green Bay for the Loins game.
He was refused service in the 1919 because he was too inebriated at which time he started verbally assaulted staff.
They called the Police and when they arrived he physically assaulted the police officers trying to bite one on the leg.
When they got him in the squad car he kept banging his head against the plexiglass screen between the seats.
I think this particular Yooper should move to Philadelphia.😂
Porforis
4 years ago

Stop assessing the spot foul and start imposing a 15-yard (or better yet, 10-yard) penalty for defensive pass interference, and the need for challenges disappears instantly.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Except people are still screaming bloody murder over this game and asking for rule changes, over a 5 yard + first down penalty. Swap those hands to the face with DPI @ 10 yard penalties and you'd still have people screaming for review.

I'm not so much saying that challenges for PI is a good idea, as I'm saying that no matter what you do people will be screaming and complaining and asking for reviews for everything under the sun. IMO, the NFL should ignore them all.
Cheesey
4 years ago
True.
Fact is, you could probably find something to penalize every play.
In trying to appease the whiners, it has made it almost impossible for the refs to do their jobs.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
4 years ago

One Packers fan, a Yooper from Iron Mountain Michigan, didn't fare so well when he was in Green Bay for the Loins game.
He was refused service in the 1919 because he was too inebriated at which time he started verbally assaulted staff.
They called the Police and when they arrived he physically assaulted the police officers trying to bite one on the leg.
When they got him in the squad car he kept banging his head against the plexiglass screen between the seats.
I think this particular Yooper should move to Philadelphia.😂

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 


How do you know all this, Yoop?
A relative or friend of yours???🤣

UserPostedImage
warhawk
4 years ago
I don't have any sympathy for the Lions.
Teams that go 3-0 on the turnovers win 91% of the time. The Lions only managed 9 points on the 3 turnovers. This doesn't even include them catching our guys totally off guard on the first play of the game and not getting in the end zone then either.
In the last 55 minutes of the game Detroit only gained 167 yards. Our D stuffed their run (kudos to Lowry) and our pass rush really started to pressure Stafford.

So they complain about penalties being the reason they lost? I don't think so. The league really needs to look at the rules and make it easier to determine a foul in real time. What difference should it make if the DL has his hand on the face mask pushing the OL's head back or if it's a fist to the throat that does the same thing? Another way to put it how is an OL supposed to block a DL he cannot see because his head's shoved back looking at the sky? Besides, the 2nd one was on the DL. He got called the first time and should have taken that as being put on notice. He went back there anyway so that one was on him.







"The train is leaving the station."
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago

I guess we can look to the college game as a reference. I don't watch many college games but I don't see the abuse you are concerned about being a major issue.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


My point precisely. I thought I made it in my original post, but apparently I failed to type it out. I don't think there's any evidence that DBs in the college game mug receivers all the way down the field, so I'm skeptical of the notion that it would become a major problem in the NFL. The offense would score at will if the defense was giving up automatic first downs like that.

When it comes to enforcing the rules of the game, I like the analogy of cops enforcing speed limits: They have every right to pull you over and give you a ticket for going a mile per hour over the posted limit, but the overwhelming majority of the time, they exercise their power of discretion and overlook minor offenses. Similarly, NFL officials should be instructed to watch for egregious interactions, the ones that truly give a team an unfair advantage or represent a major threat to player safety, and let the rest of them slide. That's basically the stance they take in the postseason, and it makes for a more enjoyable product on the field.

Let the players play, and toss the assholes and psychopaths. Compared to other sports, the NFL is far too timid with player ejections.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
4 years ago
I think the college system of replays is vastly superior to the NFL's, but egos preclude us from adopting it.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago
I don't watch enough college ball to be familiar with the replay system. How does it differ from the NFL's?
UserPostedImage
beast
4 years ago

Yup...

You just misunderstand the salary cap a little here. Yes, you're right Jimmy Graham's contract averaged about $10 million per season, however, that is not how the salary cap is calculated. Graham's first year cap hit was just under $6 million and Mo Wilkerson's was $5 million for 2018 season.

Graham's cap hit's for 2019 and 2020 are $12.6 million and $11.6 million respectively.

This is why I believe so many Packers fans were pissed off the Packers paid Graham that bonus (~$5 million?) in March '19 because we had an "out" and didn't take it.

As for keeping Randall Cobb over Jordy Nelson. I think both are done and finished so if we had got rid of both I would have been okay. If I had to take one or the other??

Players tend to play really well the first year away from their long tenured franchise relative to the second year so while hindsight makes me wanna say Nelson, I think I'll have to say Cobb only because he got us that win against Bears. I actually can't remember another play from 2018 with him off the top of my head.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Nope I didn't misunderstanding the cap, I just understand the fact that looking at a single year of the cap is set up to lie and your spreading the lie as truth.

Nelson being released saved 10.2 million

The second Graham signed (and didn't retire) cost the Packers $11 million in guarantees spread over the first 5 years or the life of the contract, which ever is shorter.

You're falsely arguing that since it's spread out over the 3 years it's not as much, but that's a lie as the fact is it's still $11 million dollars that you can't get back (unless he retires). Which is why there would be a $12.5+ million dead cap hit if we release him which you have totally failed to calculating to your numbers, as that money is already in Graham's pocket and has to hit the salary cap too)

If you only look at a single year then you fail to correct account for entire signing bonus... and the cap is nothing more than a delayed accounting system, the delayed part is way you need to look at more than one year.


Graham's first year of the contract cost the Packers more Nelson's final year... unless you put the single year blinders on... but money and available money can be moved from one year to another year, so there is no need for those blinders unless a team is over the single year limit (which isn't allowed) so the total money amount should be the focus than any single year (unless someone is over the limit).
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (10h) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (13h) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (15h) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (17h) : Flag?
Martha Careful (17h) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (18h) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.