wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago
I have been expecting some fallout like this but not to this degree nor this quickly.

Outside the Lines 

It's a pretty long article and I have not finished it. From what I have read I think OTL is 100% accurate.

From the NFL to rec leagues, football is facing a stark, new threat: an evaporating insurance market that is fundamentally altering the economics of the sport, squeezing and even killing off programs faced with higher costs and a scarcity of available coverage, an Outside the Lines investigation has found.

The NFL no longer has general liability insurance covering head trauma, according to multiple sources; just one carrier is willing to provide workers' compensation coverage for NFL teams. Before concussion litigation roiled the NFL beginning in 2011, at least a dozen carriers occupied the insurance market for pro football, according to industry experts.

The insurance choices for football helmet manufacturers are equally slim; one helmet company executive said he was aware of only one. Pop Warner Little Scholars, which oversees 225,000 youth players, was forced to switch insurers after its longtime carrier, a subsidiary of the insurance giant AIG, refused to provide coverage without an exclusion for any neurological injury.

"People say football will never go away, but if we can't get insurance, it will," Jon Butler, Pop Warner's executive director, lamented to colleagues after discovering that just one carrier was willing to cover the organization for head trauma, according to a person who was present.

Dr. Julian Bailes, Pop Warner's medical director and a member of the NFL's Head, Neck and Spine Committee, told Outside the Lines "insurance coverage is arguably the biggest threat to the sport."



In fact, pressure from litigation has already led to numerous improvements in player safety at all levels. The NFL has spent tens of millions of dollars on concussion research, sponsored a nationwide program called Heads Up to promote player safety and enacted dozens of rule changes designed to reduce head injuries. One of those rules for this season, an effort to curb targeting, generated intense preseason scrutiny and discussion among players, fans and coaches, even as commissioner Roger Goodell said, "Our focus is on how to take the head out of the game and make sure we're using the helmet as protection, and it's not being used as a weapon."



As I read this I kept thinking about what I thought was an incredibly stupid comment my driver's ed teacher told us back in the 70's. He said as cars add more and more safety equipment people are feeling more and more secure. They are relaxing to a larger degree. They are taking more chances. "IF EVER CAR HAD A DAGGER IN THE STEERING WHEEL THAT WAS POINTED AT THE DRIVER THERE WOULD BE A LOT FEWER ACCIDENTS BECAUSE DRIVERS WOULD BE GOING SLOWER. THEY WOULD BE MORE COURTEOUS TO OTHERS. THEY WOULD TAKE FEWER CHANCES." In a way the same can be said for football. If they had the old leather helmets there would be fewer helmet to helmet hits. Almost no one would try to spear another player. There is no way in the world the NFL would go back to that kind of a helmet but players get a sense of invulnerability with the newer, "safer" helmets.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
WPR, great post...a real problem. Waivers go only so far in protecting coach. The point regarding development beyond the leather helmet is ironic and compelling.

If leagues can't get coverage, then coaches can't get it. And only and idiot would coach without either private or school based insurance coverage...then we get the worst coaches and likely even worse outcomes.

I am frankly surprised hockey can get coverage.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
5 years ago

Great points wpr! Needing or lacking of insurance coverage is starting a number of different things, as insurance companies are being more cautious as America has become more sue happy if anything goes wrong, as sometimes users are winning lawsuits even if it's users own fault.

I was sent an email that was the 10 stupidest lawsuits of the year, that actually won in court (some of which were overturned upon appeal)... the one that has really stuck in my mind was a women won a lawsuit against her car maker because, while on the highway she put her cruise control on, and took her hands and feet off of the controls expecting to stay in the lane while she did something else... she of course had a bad crash, and sued based on, nowhere in the owner's manual does it say you have to keep your hands on the wheel during cruise control... and somehow won the first court case.... which of course the company was refusing to pay as they appealed, but they said all the new owners manual would be updated to say keep your hands on the wheel.


But back to things we are losing for lack of insurance coverage, I remember I used to LOVE going to my neighborhood pool... it had two diving boards, the high one was great. I'm guessing the high one was 15 foot high.... my highschool had one too. Now I can't even find a place with a low diving board... when I asked around to find out why... they said lawsuits drove the insurance too high so most pools wouldn't put them in and even if they did, most diving board makers were now building them with the least amount of spring possible to avoid lawsuits and therefore they were less fun.

UserPostedImage
yooperfan
5 years ago
Money grubbing insurance companies and lawyers will obliterate many of the things that us free spirited Americans have enjoyed and taken for granted for most of our lives.
My time on this earth is short, my grandchildren's lives are just beginning.
They probably won't know sports as we know them today.
I wonder if my grandchildren will be willing to pay a hundred bucks a seat to watch the Green Bay Packers play flag football.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago

Money grubbing insurance companies and lawyers will obliterate many of the things that us free spirited Americans have enjoyed and taken for granted for most of our lives.
My time on this earth is short, my grandchildren's lives are just beginning.
They probably won't know sports as we know them today.
I wonder if my grandchildren will be willing to pay a hundred bucks a seat to watch the Green Bay Packers play flag football.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



yoop, "money grubbing insurance companies" really? Here'a list of Forbes most profitable companies in 2016. I am sorry I couldn't find 2017 list. It's too early for 2018.

1. Apple
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 3
2016 Profits: $45.7 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 21%
2. J.P. Morgan Chase
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 21
2016 Profits: $24.7 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 23%
3. Berkshire Hathaway
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 2
2016 Profits: $24.1 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 11%
4. Wells Fargo
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 25
2016 Profits: $21.9 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 23%
5. Alphabet (Google)
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 27
2016 Profits: $19.5 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 22%
6. Bank of America
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 26
2016 Profits: $17.9 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 19%
7. Microsoft
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 28
2016 Profits: $16.8 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 20%
8. Johnson & Johnson
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 35
2016 Profits: $16.5 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 23%
9. Citigroup
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 30
2016 Profits: $14.9 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 18%
10. Altria Group
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 148
2016 Profits: $14.2 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 74%

Only one of them is into insurance to any significance. That is Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. While they own a few insurance companies they are into a lot of other things as well.

All businesses need to make a profit. Insurance is no different than any other business. They look at the exposure/cost and come up with prices based on it. There are 50 Departments of Insurance. There are over 1000 insurance companies. There is no way possible to over charge the consumer in this day and age. Government regulation and competition won't allow it. In the personal auto line alone I have people call me every single day and complain that the price went up $5 dollars, $10 or what ever. I showed a guy who was complaining that the price actually decreased the last 3 times and his insurance was actually 25% less than it was 2 years ago. If you owned stock in a company you would demand they do their best to provide you with the greatest returns possible. Just because you personally have chosen not to invest don't make it wrong. (For the record I don't have any stock either.)

As for your lawyer comment, in the past I pointed the finger at them but you know what, it's not their fault. As beast pointed out juries are awarding settlements right and left. Well beyond what insurance companies ever dreamed possible.

As an example of the weak jury issue, I sat on a DWI case. The dude was weaving all over the road. He said he had a beer 3-4 hours earlier. His wife said they split the beer. His buddy said the three of them split the beer 3-4 hours earlier. And yet after all that time he still blew a .08 90 minutes after being arrested. .08 on 1 beer! I don't think it's possible for an 80 pound person to register that high on 1 beer at any time. Any how in the jury room a guy roughly 30 years old said he wasn't going to convict him. After all some day it might be him and he hopes he has someone watching his back. 2 other guys nodded in agreement.

People award huge judgments because they hope they will get a windfall some day. That's why people buy lottery tickets. They want to win even thought hey know it's not very likely.

Insurance and even trial lawyers are only reflecting the views of society. We are about the same age. Do you remember these issues back in the late 60's and early 70's? No way. Society has changed.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
WPR, good perspectives, as usual.

Tort reforms are necessary as we are all paying the cost for frivolous law-suits.

Insurance Companies aren't the bad guys here (I don't work for, sell, or own any insurance stocks.) To stay in business they HAVE to plan on making a profit predicated on actuarial risk, and with potential litigation, some of it frivolous, the risk/return ratio simply does not justify writing the policies.

If insurance companies can't make money they won't provide the service. It is important to keep in mind this is the same reality with any other service or product...including healthcare)
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
gbguy20
5 years ago
Can we blame the medical industry then for driving up the prices in this country so absurdly astronomically ridiculously high that even the insurance can no longer afford to pay the medical bills either?
yooperfan
5 years ago

yoop, "money grubbing insurance companies" really? Here'a list of Forbes most profitable companies in 2016. I am sorry I couldn't find 2017 list. It's too early for 2018.

1. Apple
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 3
2016 Profits: $45.7 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 21%
2. J.P. Morgan Chase
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 21
2016 Profits: $24.7 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 23%
3. Berkshire Hathaway
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 2
2016 Profits: $24.1 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 11%
4. Wells Fargo
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 25
2016 Profits: $21.9 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 23%
5. Alphabet (Google)
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 27
2016 Profits: $19.5 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 22%
6. Bank of America
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 26
2016 Profits: $17.9 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 19%
7. Microsoft
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 28
2016 Profits: $16.8 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 20%
8. Johnson & Johnson
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 35
2016 Profits: $16.5 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 23%
9. Citigroup
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 30
2016 Profits: $14.9 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 18%
10. Altria Group
Fortune 500 Rank: No. 148
2016 Profits: $14.2 billion
% of Revenues (Margin): 74%

Only one of them is into insurance to any significance. That is Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. While they own a few insurance companies they are into a lot of other things as well.

All businesses need to make a profit. Insurance is no different than any other business. They look at the exposure/cost and come up with prices based on it. There are 50 Departments of Insurance. There are over 1000 insurance companies. There is no way possible to over charge the consumer in this day and age. Government regulation and competition won't allow it. In the personal auto line alone I have people call me every single day and complain that the price went up $5 dollars, $10 or what ever. I showed a guy who was complaining that the price actually decreased the last 3 times and his insurance was actually 25% less than it was 2 years ago. If you owned stock in a company you would demand they do their best to provide you with the greatest returns possible. Just because you personally have chosen not to invest don't make it wrong. (For the record I don't have any stock either.)

As for your lawyer comment, in the past I pointed the finger at them but you know what, it's not their fault. As beast pointed out juries are awarding settlements right and left. Well beyond what insurance companies ever dreamed possible.

As an example of the weak jury issue, I sat on a DWI case. The dude was weaving all over the road. He said he had a beer 3-4 hours earlier. His wife said they split the beer. His buddy said the three of them split the beer 3-4 hours earlier. And yet after all that time he still blew a .08 90 minutes after being arrested. .08 on 1 beer! I don't think it's possible for an 80 pound person to register that high on 1 beer at any time. Any how in the jury room a guy roughly 30 years old said he wasn't going to convict him. After all some day it might be him and he hopes he has someone watching his back. 2 other guys nodded in agreement.

People award huge judgments because they hope they will get a windfall some day. That's why people buy lottery tickets. They want to win even thought hey know it's not very likely.

Insurance and even trial lawyers are only reflecting the views of society. We are about the same age. Do you remember these issues back in the late 60's and early 70's? No way. Society has changed.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


WPR, as I hit the post button it occurred to me that my post might irritate you and that wasn't my intent.
However, historically big insurance companies have been big money makers. Perhaps in this day and age not so much as during the 60's and 70's.
Insurance companies back in those days had such deep pockets that they had no problems financing other big companies big projects like two iron mines right here in Ishpeming.
I'm sure times have changed and I simply haven't kept up but I know a number of agency owners in this area and none of them are hurting by any means.
As far as lawyers go, my brother in law is an insurance company lawyer and I can't stand his arrogant ass. Never mind that he's a Lions fan.
I do understand that we live in an increasingly litigious society which probably puts a lot of financial pressures on insurance companies but at this point in my life I doubt that my feelings about insurance companies and lawyers will change.

KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
If you sit down and talk with doctors, they will tell you that the biggest cost of medical care results in medical malpractice and the tests ordered and procedures undertaken to "cover their asses" against ambulance chasers.

Are their bad doctors...yes. Are there bad insurance companies/policies/procedures...yes. But without question, the two biggest costs are unnecessary tests, and covering the uninsured....I am attaching an article from Time Magazine, not exactly the bastion of capitalism....http://time.com/3754900/doctors-unnecessary-tests/

But back to the essence of the thread, if someone thinks there is money to be made insuring football players, leagues, etc., go out and raise the money and start one and if you are right, you will make tons of money.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Fan Shout
beast (5h) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (5h) : fuck
beast (6h) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (6h) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (6h) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (6h) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (6h) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (6h) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (6h) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (7h) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (8h) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (8h) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (8h) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (8h) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (8h) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.
beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.