zombieslayer
14 years ago
Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Finley88Beast
14 years ago

Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Idk thats a good question I didn't really see that much of him these past 2 games at all..

Maybe he"ll go back to his fb roll or something,honestly don't have an answer to where he has been.

For the most part ill answer your question,I think he hasn't played much because of how MM Gameplaned for the last 2 games with not to much I-formations.V.S the falcons idk if he even carried the ball once he just played as the 3rd down back in shotgun sometimes..

Could be like the A.J hawk situation in week 1 sorta thing but who knows.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Dulak
14 years ago

Well, I didn't watch the game but nobody answered my question. I think I've asked this it on several threads. What happened to Kuhn? How come we didn't put him in there on those 4th and 1s? Was he suited up?

I'm not for all pass. I think it depends on the circumstance. Atlanta's weakness is defending the pass so that's why I'm adamant about passing against them. The Giants however are #1 in the NFL at defending the pass so we better be able to run against them.

Now, someone please answer my question - what happened to Kuhn?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I asked this same question multiple times in the chat and after - wtf was kuhn; I remember him only getting 1 play that game and I think it was a pass.

Here we were at the endzone 3rd and 1 and we give it to rodgers to sneak 2x against the falcons stiff run D.

2 things stood out for me with the packers and short yardage plays. We often were successful with short passes to kuhn (remember last year hom many times we saw kuhn in the endzone holding the ball ...)
and #2 with big quinn as our lead blocker and big kuhn as our RB ... those 2 could often get the job done.

We didnt even use him on our other 4th and 1 that rodgers called us to do.

and btw - where's the freaking screens? ... ok so we cant run vs the falcons; how about some short yardage screens? with some lead blockers ... just cuz taucher is out doesnt mean we cant screen.

anyways - seems like we were trying to do some things that were different and yet didnt work when we could of done some things that would of probably worked.

But this topic is about 5 wr sets ... and ya do what works ...
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Had he gone to the 5, that opens up a running lane for Rodgers, which would keep the defense "honest".
And the runs were NOT WORKING. That's my point. Should we do it every game? No....i never said that. But in THIS game running got us NOTHING. Unless it was Rodgers taking off.
Am i wrong about that?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Zombieslayer and others have convinced me on the "balance" question. And while I still hanker for the return of running game "dominance", I realize that the game has changed.

But I'm still with Shawn and macbob.

Because a team still needs to be able to do some things running-wise. There must be some situations that the opposing team must be considering "run play" as a credible option.

1. Play action only works to the extent that people believe you might be calling a running play.
2. When it's first and goal inside the ten, the opposing team has to consider run plays as real possibilities. And not just quarterback sneaks and trick run plays like quarterback draws.
3. A team must be able to get a first down with regularity by running the ball when it's third and short, or fourth and one.

IMO #3 is not the case with this team, and #2 is questionable. And, partly because of #3 and #2, #1 is not as powerful as it should be.

We have been spoiled because Rodgers is so good at covering up the weaknesses of the line. But unless they are solved, problems in #1-#3 are going to make his job more and more difficult. Maybe not against SF or Detroit. But if the team gets to the playoffs?
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Yes....for the most part, you need "balance".
But how many times in one particular game do you need to slam your head into a wall before you decide, "Hey....maybe this isn't working".?

We need a running game. That's a given. But in that game, it wasn't working even a little bit. Every run was a waste of a down.
Play to your strengths until the opposition proves they can stop you.

Doesn't that make sense?

And as far as i can see, our running game is just not working this year. So should you be stubborn, just to say "Look! We ran the ball!" so that people don't say your one dimensional?
Do what works for that game. If you CAN run, GREAT!
If you can't, do something else.
Or in the end, you will end up on the wrong end of the won-lost column.
You know.....just like we did.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
14 years ago
Our passing game was affective to a degree because McCarthy did call on the run and Rodgers was able to play behind the center often enough to require the defense to defend the run.

I think the offense and Rodgers does very well with him under center and faking a handoff. Regardless of whether or not the run is working the defense has to respect it which allows the play action to work. This is about holding the LB's and making the DL maintain their gaps vs. allowing the LB's to cheat on the pass and allowing the linemen to all out push the pocket.

Now the best of both worlds is we get something positive out of the run game as well. This was a week where that didn't happen but while rushing the ball has not been prolific it usually accomplishes the mission of getting some positive yards and keeping the D honest. Afterall, we average about 100 yds a game.

I have resolved myself to the fact we, like most prolific passing teams, will not kick butt in the run game when we play stout four man fronts but it's going to be harder for Rodgers if we don't line up with him under center and either hand it off or go with a play action pass.

Almost everytime I see Rodgers under center and he pulls the ball back and throws it the protection is solid and something good happens. This only works because the defense must remain disciplined and true to their assigments. Otherwise they would ignore the possibility of the run altogether and just pour in on Rodgers regardless of how we are lined up.
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Yes....for the most part, you need "balance".
But how many times in one particular game do you need to slam your head into a wall before you decide, "Hey....maybe this isn't working".?

We need a running game. That's a given. But in that game, it wasn't working even a little bit. Every run was a waste of a down.
Play to your strengths until the opposition proves they can stop you.

Doesn't that make sense?

And as far as i can see, our running game is just not working this year. So should you be stubborn, just to say "Look! We ran the ball!" so that people don't say your one dimensional?
Do what works for that game. If you CAN run, GREAT!
If you can't, do something else.
Or in the end, you will end up on the wrong end of the won-lost column.
You know.....just like we did.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Yes, it totally makes sense. When talking about this game and this game only, it completely makes sense.

I try to emphasise that we're talking about this game and this game only but people will still bring up other games.

OK, this game, and this game only (for the 3rd time now) - the run was a complete waste of a down. I showed in the play by play on two threads now that running wasted a down and passing worked. We had essentially 3 TD drives including the fumble in the end zone. They were pretty much all passes. When we ran, we had to punt.

Note that I'm talking about this game and this game only.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackerTraxx
14 years ago
In the big picture we are toast without a running game. Unless your goal is to simply get into the playoffs. JMHO
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Wow. I said it 4 times. Maybe I have to say it 5 times.

This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.
This thread is about the game VERSUS THE ATLANTA FALCONS ONLY.

OK. Now that we're clear (hopefully) that we're talking about the Atlanta Falcons game, please continue.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (8h) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (9h) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (13h) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (17h) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (1-Aug) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
11h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

20h / Around The NFL / wpr

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.